Safety assessment of selinexor: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-03-12 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2442021
Wei Zhang, Kai Tao, Bin Zeng, Linghui Deng, Ping Lu, Ting Niu, Shi Qiu, Lu Yang
{"title":"Safety assessment of selinexor: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.","authors":"Wei Zhang, Kai Tao, Bin Zeng, Linghui Deng, Ping Lu, Ting Niu, Shi Qiu, Lu Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2442021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selinexor is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. However, a comprehensive understanding of adverse events associated with selinexor is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical trials of selinexor in patients with multiple myeloma were reviewed. We investigated selinexor-related adverse events through data of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The disproportionality analysis was conducted. Four algorithms were employed to evaluate the signals of adverse events. The adverse effects of selinexor combined with dexamethasone were compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Sensitivity analysis was performed to exclude consumer-reported adverse events. The onset of adverse reactions were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,698 reports related with selinexor from FAERS were identified. 6 significant system organ class and 42 significant preferred terms (PTs) were found. Unexpected significant adverse events including mania, acute kidney injury, orthostatic hypotension, and embolisms were identified. 14 PTs reported significant signals in treatment of selinexor combined dexamethasone compared with traditional treatment of bortezomib and dexamethasone. 45.2% of adverse events occurred within the first month of starting selinexor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comprehensive analyses of selinexor related adverse events are helpful for clinical detection of adverse events and timely intervention, advancing selinexor's therapeutic progress in future treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2442021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selinexor is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. However, a comprehensive understanding of adverse events associated with selinexor is lacking.

Methods: Clinical trials of selinexor in patients with multiple myeloma were reviewed. We investigated selinexor-related adverse events through data of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The disproportionality analysis was conducted. Four algorithms were employed to evaluate the signals of adverse events. The adverse effects of selinexor combined with dexamethasone were compared with bortezomib and dexamethasone. Sensitivity analysis was performed to exclude consumer-reported adverse events. The onset of adverse reactions were calculated.

Results: A total of 1,698 reports related with selinexor from FAERS were identified. 6 significant system organ class and 42 significant preferred terms (PTs) were found. Unexpected significant adverse events including mania, acute kidney injury, orthostatic hypotension, and embolisms were identified. 14 PTs reported significant signals in treatment of selinexor combined dexamethasone compared with traditional treatment of bortezomib and dexamethasone. 45.2% of adverse events occurred within the first month of starting selinexor.

Conclusions: Comprehensive analyses of selinexor related adverse events are helpful for clinical detection of adverse events and timely intervention, advancing selinexor's therapeutic progress in future treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
selinexor的安全性评估:一项真实世界的药物警戒研究。
背景:Selinexor被批准用于治疗复发或难治性多发性骨髓瘤。然而,对与selinexor相关的不良事件缺乏全面的了解。方法:回顾塞利那索治疗多发性骨髓瘤的临床试验。我们通过美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据调查了selinexor相关的不良事件。进行歧化分析。采用四种算法来评估不良事件的信号。并与硼替佐米、地塞米松联合用药的不良反应进行比较。进行敏感性分析以排除消费者报告的不良事件。计算不良反应的发生时间。结果:从FAERS中共鉴定出1698例与selinexor相关的报告。发现6个重要的系统器官分类和42个重要的首选项(PTs)。发现了意想不到的重大不良事件,包括躁狂、急性肾损伤、直立性低血压和栓塞。与传统的硼替佐米和地塞米松治疗相比,有14名患者报告了selinexor联合地塞米松治疗的显著信号。45.2%的不良事件发生在赛力纳索开始使用的第一个月内。结论:全面分析塞利那克相关不良事件,有助于临床及时发现不良事件,及时干预,推进塞利那克在今后治疗中的治疗进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drug options in acute ischemic stroke. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. A novel, widespread impurity in mass-compounded tirzepatide/b12 products: patient safety implications. Refractory immune-related adverse events (irAes) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a multiorgan management review. Long-term safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in Japan: a 12-month post-marketing surveillance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1