Verena Kantenwein, Elisabeth Martini, Bernhard Haller, Marta Telishevska, Felix Bourier, Tilko Reents, Marc Kottmaier, Sarah Lengauer, Isabel Deisenhofer, Christof Kolb
{"title":"Long-term outcome after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with postprocedurally unmasked sinus node disease.","authors":"Verena Kantenwein, Elisabeth Martini, Bernhard Haller, Marta Telishevska, Felix Bourier, Tilko Reents, Marc Kottmaier, Sarah Lengauer, Isabel Deisenhofer, Christof Kolb","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-01998-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>About three percent of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease (SND). We sought to determine the success of ablation one year after ablation of persistent AF in patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In total, 2539 patients with an ablation of persistent AF at our centre were screened for a postprocedurally unmasked SND, which made acute cardiac pacing necessary within one week after ablation. In a propensity score-matched case-control study (1:2 matching), the long-term ablation success of 51 patients (mean age 73 ± 8 years, 59% male) with unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF was compared to that of 102 patients without SND after ablation of persistent AF. Controls were matched to cases based on the propensity score considering age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, atrial low voltage, previous number of ablations, and method of ablation. One year after ablation of persistent AF, 20 (39%) patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND and 61 (60%) patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND were in sinus rhythm (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90, p = 0.017). The number of repeat ablation procedures within the follow-up year did not differ significantly between cases and controls (mean 0.60 ± 0.68 vs 0.53 ± 0.80, rate ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.566).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with a postprocedurally unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF, long-term ablation success seems to be worse compared to patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-01998-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: About three percent of patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease (SND). We sought to determine the success of ablation one year after ablation of persistent AF in patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND.
Methods and results: In total, 2539 patients with an ablation of persistent AF at our centre were screened for a postprocedurally unmasked SND, which made acute cardiac pacing necessary within one week after ablation. In a propensity score-matched case-control study (1:2 matching), the long-term ablation success of 51 patients (mean age 73 ± 8 years, 59% male) with unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF was compared to that of 102 patients without SND after ablation of persistent AF. Controls were matched to cases based on the propensity score considering age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, gender, blood pressure, diabetes mellitus, atrial low voltage, previous number of ablations, and method of ablation. One year after ablation of persistent AF, 20 (39%) patients with postprocedurally unmasked SND and 61 (60%) patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND were in sinus rhythm (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.90, p = 0.017). The number of repeat ablation procedures within the follow-up year did not differ significantly between cases and controls (mean 0.60 ± 0.68 vs 0.53 ± 0.80, rate ratio 1.14, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.78, p = 0.566).
Conclusion: In patients with a postprocedurally unmasked SND after ablation of persistent AF, long-term ablation success seems to be worse compared to patients without postprocedurally unmasked SND.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.