Validating the use of pen scores to capture behaviors expressed by cattle unrestrained in a pen.

IF 2.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of animal science Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1093/jas/skaf026
Jamie T Parham, Jessica J Schmidt, Amy E Tanner, Mark L Wahlberg, Temple Grandin, Ronald M Lewis
{"title":"Validating the use of pen scores to capture behaviors expressed by cattle unrestrained in a pen.","authors":"Jamie T Parham, Jessica J Schmidt, Amy E Tanner, Mark L Wahlberg, Temple Grandin, Ronald M Lewis","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many subjective methods exist to assist producers in evaluating temperament. Use of a pen test, which allows behavior to be observed in a nonrestrained setting, may be an effective method to evaluate temperament by allowing more variation among animals to be expressed as compared to a restrained test. The objective of this study was to analyze video recordings of penned calves to determine whether the repertoire of behaviors they expressed was adequately captured by their individual pen score (IPS) and group pen score (GPS). In each of 3 yr, 40 predominantly Angus commercial Bos taurus heifers, 2-wk postweaning , were assessed monthly in 3 consecutive months (recording periods). After routine handling through a weigh crate and squeeze chute, each heifer was released individually into a pen (12 × 6 m). Their response to 30 s of human presence within the pen was evaluated. They were then joined in groups of four in a larger (12 × 8 m) pen and re-evaluated for 30 s in a group setting. An IPS and GPS were assigned using an ethogram, with scores ranging from 1 (docile) to 6 (aggressive). This interaction was also video recorded. Using the videos, the explicit behaviors captured by each pen score were investigated using Noldus Observer software. Data were analyzed with ANOVA using SAS. Within each recording period, the concordance of pen scores with the repertoire of behaviors expressed was compared. In the group setting, heifers could not be clearly distinguished on video and were instead assigned the average GPS of the group. Heifers with higher IPS and average GPS categories had larger flight zone sizes and reached faster paces for longer periods of time. Furthermore, heifers with lower IPS appeared more neutral to the presence of a human and moved around less often. Ethograms for pen score successfully delineated the temperament of heifers. The use of such scores can provide a valuable on-farm assessment of cattle behavior during routine handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11912831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many subjective methods exist to assist producers in evaluating temperament. Use of a pen test, which allows behavior to be observed in a nonrestrained setting, may be an effective method to evaluate temperament by allowing more variation among animals to be expressed as compared to a restrained test. The objective of this study was to analyze video recordings of penned calves to determine whether the repertoire of behaviors they expressed was adequately captured by their individual pen score (IPS) and group pen score (GPS). In each of 3 yr, 40 predominantly Angus commercial Bos taurus heifers, 2-wk postweaning , were assessed monthly in 3 consecutive months (recording periods). After routine handling through a weigh crate and squeeze chute, each heifer was released individually into a pen (12 × 6 m). Their response to 30 s of human presence within the pen was evaluated. They were then joined in groups of four in a larger (12 × 8 m) pen and re-evaluated for 30 s in a group setting. An IPS and GPS were assigned using an ethogram, with scores ranging from 1 (docile) to 6 (aggressive). This interaction was also video recorded. Using the videos, the explicit behaviors captured by each pen score were investigated using Noldus Observer software. Data were analyzed with ANOVA using SAS. Within each recording period, the concordance of pen scores with the repertoire of behaviors expressed was compared. In the group setting, heifers could not be clearly distinguished on video and were instead assigned the average GPS of the group. Heifers with higher IPS and average GPS categories had larger flight zone sizes and reached faster paces for longer periods of time. Furthermore, heifers with lower IPS appeared more neutral to the presence of a human and moved around less often. Ethograms for pen score successfully delineated the temperament of heifers. The use of such scores can provide a valuable on-farm assessment of cattle behavior during routine handling.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证使用笔分数来捕捉在笔中不受约束的牛所表达的行为1。
有许多主观的方法可以帮助生产者评价气质。使用渗透测试,允许在不受约束的环境中观察行为,与受约束的测试相比,允许在动物之间表达更多的变化,可能是评估气质的有效方法。本研究的目的是分析圈养小牛的视频记录,以确定它们的个体(IPS)和群体(GPS)圈养评分是否能充分捕捉到它们表达的所有行为。在连续3个月(记录期)中,每3年对40头主要为断奶后2周的安格斯商业母牛进行每月评估。在通过称重箱和挤压槽进行常规处理后,将每头小母牛单独释放到一个12 × 6米的围栏中。评估它们对围栏内人类存在30秒的反应。然后,它们被分成四组,在一个较大的(12 x 8米)围栏中,并在一个群体环境中重新评估30秒。使用1(温顺)至6(好斗)的心电图分配IPS和GPS。这种互动也被录了下来。通过视频,使用Noldus Observer软件对每个笔得分所捕获的外显行为进行调查。数据采用SAS方差分析。在每个记录期内,比较笔得分与所表达的行为表的一致性。在小组设置中,不能在视频中清楚地区分小母牛,而是分配了小组的平均GPS。具有较高IPS和平均GPS分类的小母牛具有较大的飞行区域大小,并且在较长的时间内达到更快的速度。此外,IPS较低的小母牛对人类的存在表现得更中性,四处走动的次数也更少。笔谱图成功地描绘了小母牛的气质。使用这样的分数可以为日常处理过程中牛的行为提供有价值的农场评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of animal science
Journal of animal science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
1589
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year. Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
46. Pre-analytical Blood Sample Handling for Downstream Cell-free DNA Analysis in Beef Cattle 41. Evaluating the Efficacy of Extension-Based Artificial Insemination Trainings on Knowledge Gain, Satisfaction Level, and Behavioral Intent 102. Software Development to Measure Ultrasonic Images in Beef Cattle 47. Seasonality of Bovine Respiratory Disease Incidence and Nasal Temperatures in Receiving Beef Cattle: A Potential Early Disease Detection Method 25. N-carbamylglutamate and Melatonin Supplementation Modulate Testicular Physiology in Peripubertal Rams Subjected to Unmitigated Heat Load
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1