Clinical impacts of malnutrition based on the GLIM criteria using the MNA-SF for nutritional screening in patients with acute heart failure.

Abstract

The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) suggested a two-step framework for the assessment of malnutrition based on screening and diagnosis. Malnutrition, as defined by the GLIM criteria, and the risk of malnutrition determined through nutritional screening are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). This study investigated the prognostic impact of malnutrition, as defined by the GLIM criteria, compared with the risk of malnutrition determined by the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) screening tool among patients hospitalized for acute HF. A total of 446 patients with acute HF who underwent nutritional screening using the MNA-SF and were diagnosed with malnutrition based on the GLIM criteria were include in this study. The primary outcome was the incidence of all-cause death or HF-related readmission after discharge. Patients diagnosed with malnutrition based on both indices had a higher incidence of adverse events within one year post-discharge than patients diagnosed without malnutrition. However, a landmark analysis of years one to three post-discharge found that the incidence of the primary outcome was comparable between patients diagnosed with malnutrition and those that here not. Furthermore, although malnutrition as defined by the GLIM criteria was found to be an independent predictor of the 1 year incidence of all-cause death or rehospitalization for HF even after adjusting for other prognostic indicators (hazard ratio, 1.593; 95% confidence interval, 1.056-2.403; P = 0.026), the risk of malnutrition based on the MNA-SF was not. In conclusion, a diagnosis of malnutrition based on the GLIM criteria provides better prognostic stratification in the first year post-discharge in patients with acute HF as compared with nutritional screening based only on the MNA-SF.