International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation.

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002145
Massimo Malagó, Pål-Dag Line, Deniz Balci
{"title":"International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation.","authors":"Massimo Malagó, Pål-Dag Line, Deniz Balci","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since its beginning in 1963, Liver Transplantation (LT) has significantly advanced, now including transplant oncology. As indications broaden, donor supply reduces. The two-stage RAPID procedure (initially abbreviated as \"Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy\") has emerged to address the use of small-for-size (SFS) grafts. However, a comprehensive evaluation of RAPID is essential given its novelty, scarcity, and diverse outcomes reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAPID Consensus International Society of Liver Surgeons (ISLS) 2023 Zurich initiative established evidence around the RAPID procedure using the Danish Model of Consensus. Engaging an international community of specialists, the initiative ensured multidisciplinary involvement and used the GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comprehensive discussions and debates led to internationally recognized recommendations addressing perioperative measures for RAPID. Key recommendations highlighted the significance of standardized nomenclature, specific indications, graft criteria, surgical techniques, optimal interstage timings, and measures to manage potential complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consensus provides recommendations for the RAPID procedure, emphasizing transparency and outcome reporting. Establishing dedicated registries can improve care standards which may ensure the benefits of RAPID by maximizing patient safety and improving outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002145","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since its beginning in 1963, Liver Transplantation (LT) has significantly advanced, now including transplant oncology. As indications broaden, donor supply reduces. The two-stage RAPID procedure (initially abbreviated as "Resection And Partial Liver Segment 2/3 Transplantation With Delayed Total Hepatectomy") has emerged to address the use of small-for-size (SFS) grafts. However, a comprehensive evaluation of RAPID is essential given its novelty, scarcity, and diverse outcomes reported.

Methods: The RAPID Consensus International Society of Liver Surgeons (ISLS) 2023 Zurich initiative established evidence around the RAPID procedure using the Danish Model of Consensus. Engaging an international community of specialists, the initiative ensured multidisciplinary involvement and used the GRADE framework to evaluate the quality of evidence and grade the recommendations.

Results: Comprehensive discussions and debates led to internationally recognized recommendations addressing perioperative measures for RAPID. Key recommendations highlighted the significance of standardized nomenclature, specific indications, graft criteria, surgical techniques, optimal interstage timings, and measures to manage potential complications.

Conclusion: The consensus provides recommendations for the RAPID procedure, emphasizing transparency and outcome reporting. Establishing dedicated registries can improve care standards which may ensure the benefits of RAPID by maximizing patient safety and improving outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于肝移植中 RAPID 程序的国际共识建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
Letter: considerations on nonsurgical risk factors for marginal ulcer following Roux-en-Y Gastric bypass for obesity. Roving histological imaging for navigation-confirmed glioma negative margin by handheld endomicroscopy: a parallel controlled study. Exploring genes associated with metabolic dysfunction as therapeutic targets for head and neck cancers: a novel strategy. International consensus recommendations for the RAPID procedure in liver transplantation. Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-Hcc patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1