Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-HCC patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.

IF 10.1 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY International journal of surgery Pub Date : 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280
Hye-Sung Jo, Young-In Yoon, Ki-Hun Kim, Parissa Tabrizian, Rebecca Marino, Pedro Marin-Castro, Wellington Andraus, Jongman Kim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Deok-Gie Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Carlos Florez-Zorrilla, Deniz Balci, Henrik Petrowsky, Karim J Halazun, Dong-Sik Kim
{"title":"Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-HCC patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Hye-Sung Jo, Young-In Yoon, Ki-Hun Kim, Parissa Tabrizian, Rebecca Marino, Pedro Marin-Castro, Wellington Andraus, Jongman Kim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Deok-Gie Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Carlos Florez-Zorrilla, Deniz Balci, Henrik Petrowsky, Karim J Halazun, Dong-Sik Kim","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In the current \"sickest first\" allocation policy for limited deceased liver grafts, identifying patients \"too sick to transplant\" before transplantation is crucial to optimize outcomes. This study aimed to predict futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) scores ≥30.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international multicenter study was conducted as part of the International Society of Liver Surgeons. We collected data from patients with a MELD-Na score of ≥30 who underwent DDLT. A total of 994 patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2021, including 654 from the Republic of Korea, 224 from the USA, and 116 from other regions. Futility was defined as death within 3 months or during the hospital stay following a DDLT. After exclusion, 160 (16.6%) patients were classified into a futile group and 803 (83.4%) into a non-futile group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MELD-Na scores collected at three time points (listing, matching, and transplantation) were comparable between the groups ( P = 0.442, P = 0.180, and P = 0.554, respectively). Regarding concomitant organ failure factors, the futile group showed a higher incidence of organ dysfunction across all measured parameters, including the use of mechanical ventilators, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), pneumonia, bacteremia, and vasopressor use (all P < 0.01). Independent risk factors for futile outcome were recipient age (≥65 years), body mass index (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), mechanical ventilator use, CRRT (≥1 week), and prolonged intensive care unit stay before transplantation (≥2 weeks). The futility rate was 53.3% in patients with ≥3 risk factors ( P < 0.001). We developed a nomogram to predict futility after DDLT based on multivariate regression analysis, which showed a better predictive power than previous models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The risk factors and new nomogram, which adequately reflect concomitant organ failure before liver transplantation, could effectively predict the risk of futile outcomes after DDLT and contribute to decision-making regarding transplantation eligibility in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3148-3158"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12165517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In the current "sickest first" allocation policy for limited deceased liver grafts, identifying patients "too sick to transplant" before transplantation is crucial to optimize outcomes. This study aimed to predict futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) scores ≥30.

Methods: This international multicenter study was conducted as part of the International Society of Liver Surgeons. We collected data from patients with a MELD-Na score of ≥30 who underwent DDLT. A total of 994 patients were enrolled between 2010 and 2021, including 654 from the Republic of Korea, 224 from the USA, and 116 from other regions. Futility was defined as death within 3 months or during the hospital stay following a DDLT. After exclusion, 160 (16.6%) patients were classified into a futile group and 803 (83.4%) into a non-futile group.

Results: The MELD-Na scores collected at three time points (listing, matching, and transplantation) were comparable between the groups ( P = 0.442, P = 0.180, and P = 0.554, respectively). Regarding concomitant organ failure factors, the futile group showed a higher incidence of organ dysfunction across all measured parameters, including the use of mechanical ventilators, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), pneumonia, bacteremia, and vasopressor use (all P < 0.01). Independent risk factors for futile outcome were recipient age (≥65 years), body mass index (<18.5 kg/m 2 ), mechanical ventilator use, CRRT (≥1 week), and prolonged intensive care unit stay before transplantation (≥2 weeks). The futility rate was 53.3% in patients with ≥3 risk factors ( P < 0.001). We developed a nomogram to predict futility after DDLT based on multivariate regression analysis, which showed a better predictive power than previous models.

Conclusion: The risk factors and new nomogram, which adequately reflect concomitant organ failure before liver transplantation, could effectively predict the risk of futile outcomes after DDLT and contribute to decision-making regarding transplantation eligibility in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MELD-Na评分高于30的非hcc患者死亡供肝移植后无效预后预测:一项回顾性国际多中心队列研究
背景:在目前“病情最严重优先”的有限死亡肝移植分配政策中,在移植前确定“病情太重而不能移植”的患者对于优化结果至关重要。本研究旨在预测终末期肝病模型-钠(MELD-Na)评分≥30的患者死亡供肝移植(DDLT)后的无效结果。方法:这项国际多中心研究是作为国际肝脏外科学会的一部分进行的。我们收集了MELD-Na评分≥30且接受DDLT的患者的数据。2010年至2021年间,共有994名患者入组,其中韩国654名,美国224名,其他地区116名。无效被定义为在DDLT后三个月内或住院期间死亡。排除后,160例(16.6%)患者被分为无效组,803例(83.4%)患者被分为非无效组。结果:3个时间点MELD-Na评分(挂牌、配对、移植)组间具有可比性(P = 0.442、P = 0.180、P = 0.554)。至于伴随的器官衰竭因素,无效组在所有测量参数中都显示出更高的器官功能障碍发生率,包括机械呼吸机的使用、持续肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)、肺炎、菌血症和血管加压药的使用(均为p)。这些危险因素和新的nomogram能充分反映肝移植前并发器官衰竭的情况,能有效预测DDLT术后无效结局的风险,有助于临床实践中对移植资格的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
期刊最新文献
General vs regional anesthesia: differential effects on postoperative anxiety, depression, and stress biomarkers in arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Comprehensive assessment of postoperative metachronous liver metastasis risk in colon cancer based on inflammatory indicators: a multicenter prospective study. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence for predicting post-excision recurrence and malignant progression in oral potentially malignant disorders: a retrospective cohort study". Coronal imbalance and intervertebral disc degeneration in degenerative scoliosis: an analysis using Hounsfield units measurement. Device-measured physical activity and long-term outcomes in IBD: promise, plausibility, and clinical translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1