Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-Hcc patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.
Hye-Sung Jo, Young-In Yoon, Ki-Hun Kim, Parissa Tabrizian, Rebecca Marino, Pedro Marin-Castro, Wellington Andraus, Jongman Kim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Deok-Gie Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Carlos Florez-Zorrilla, Deniz Balci, Henrik Petrowsky, Karim J Halazun, Dong-Sik Kim
{"title":"Predicting futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation in non-Hcc patients with MELD-Na score above 30: a retrospective international multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Hye-Sung Jo, Young-In Yoon, Ki-Hun Kim, Parissa Tabrizian, Rebecca Marino, Pedro Marin-Castro, Wellington Andraus, Jongman Kim, Gyu-Seong Choi, Deok-Gie Kim, Dong Jin Joo, Carlos Florez-Zorrilla, Deniz Balci, Henrik Petrowsky, Karim J Halazun, Dong-Sik Kim","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the current \"sickest first\" allocation policy for limited deceased liver grafts, identifying patients \"too sick to transplant\" before transplantation is crucial to optimize outcomes. This study aimed to predict futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores ≥30.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international multicenter study was conducted as part of the International Society of Liver Surgeons. We collected data from patients with a MELD-Na score ≥30 who underwent DDLT. A total of 994 patients were enrolled between 2010-2021, including 654 from the Republic of Korea, 224 from the US, and 116 from other regions. Futility was defined as death within three months or during the hospital stay following a DDLT. After exclusion, 160 (16.6%) patients were classified into a futile group and 803 (83.4%) into a non-futile group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MELD-Na scores collected at three time points (listing, matching, and transplantation) were comparable between the groups (P = 0.442, P = 0.180, and P = 0.554, respectively). Regarding concomitant organ failure factors, the futile group showed a higher incidence of organ dysfunction across all measured parameters, including the use of mechanical ventilators, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), pneumonia, bacteremia, and vasopressor use (all P<0.01). Independent risk factors for futile outcome were recipient age (≥65 years), body mass index (<18.5 kg/m2), mechanical ventilator use, CRRT (≥1 week), and prolonged ICU stay before transplantation (≥2 weeks). The futility rate was 53.3% in patients with ≥3 risk factors (P<0.001). We developed a nomogram to predict futility after DDLT based on multivariate regression analysis, which showed a better predictive power than previous models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk factors and new nomogram, which adequately reflect concomitant organ failure before liver transplantation, could effectively predict the risk of futile outcomes after DDLT and contribute to decision-making regarding transplantation eligibility in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002280","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In the current "sickest first" allocation policy for limited deceased liver grafts, identifying patients "too sick to transplant" before transplantation is crucial to optimize outcomes. This study aimed to predict futile outcomes following deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in patients with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) scores ≥30.
Methods: This international multicenter study was conducted as part of the International Society of Liver Surgeons. We collected data from patients with a MELD-Na score ≥30 who underwent DDLT. A total of 994 patients were enrolled between 2010-2021, including 654 from the Republic of Korea, 224 from the US, and 116 from other regions. Futility was defined as death within three months or during the hospital stay following a DDLT. After exclusion, 160 (16.6%) patients were classified into a futile group and 803 (83.4%) into a non-futile group.
Results: The MELD-Na scores collected at three time points (listing, matching, and transplantation) were comparable between the groups (P = 0.442, P = 0.180, and P = 0.554, respectively). Regarding concomitant organ failure factors, the futile group showed a higher incidence of organ dysfunction across all measured parameters, including the use of mechanical ventilators, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), pneumonia, bacteremia, and vasopressor use (all P<0.01). Independent risk factors for futile outcome were recipient age (≥65 years), body mass index (<18.5 kg/m2), mechanical ventilator use, CRRT (≥1 week), and prolonged ICU stay before transplantation (≥2 weeks). The futility rate was 53.3% in patients with ≥3 risk factors (P<0.001). We developed a nomogram to predict futility after DDLT based on multivariate regression analysis, which showed a better predictive power than previous models.
Conclusions: The risk factors and new nomogram, which adequately reflect concomitant organ failure before liver transplantation, could effectively predict the risk of futile outcomes after DDLT and contribute to decision-making regarding transplantation eligibility in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.