Antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic prescribing practices and antimicrobial stewardship in South Africa: a scoping review.

IF 3.3 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2025-02-04 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlaf014
Suwayda Ahmed, Rukshana Ahmed, Razia Zulfikar Adam, Renier Coetzee
{"title":"Antimicrobial resistance, antibiotic prescribing practices and antimicrobial stewardship in South Africa: a scoping review.","authors":"Suwayda Ahmed, Rukshana Ahmed, Razia Zulfikar Adam, Renier Coetzee","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat, with notable impact evident in low- and middle-income countries. Indiscriminate antibiotic prescribing is recognized as the key factor responsible for the continued spread of AMR.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To comprehensively map published data of evidence of AMR in healthcare settings in South Africa, encompassing the exploration of antibiotic prescribing practices and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scoping review methodology was based on the guidelines outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The protocol for this scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PWMFB). The search strategy was documented using the protocol outlined within the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases used were Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, Wiley, Directory of Open Access Journals; and health organizations such as the WHO. In addition, the Google search engine was used to search for grey matter. The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles in English on human studies for the period 2019-24.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded a total of 529 articles from electronic databases and search engines. Twenty-nine articles were accepted for inclusion following the application of the study protocol. The majority of the articles were primary research papers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings reveal that South Africa has measures in place to combat AMR; however, inconsistencies were found between the private and public health sectors, in addition to the lack of adherence to guidelines and limitations in AMR education among healthcare workers and students.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 1","pages":"dlaf014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is an emerging global threat, with notable impact evident in low- and middle-income countries. Indiscriminate antibiotic prescribing is recognized as the key factor responsible for the continued spread of AMR.

Objectives: To comprehensively map published data of evidence of AMR in healthcare settings in South Africa, encompassing the exploration of antibiotic prescribing practices and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.

Methods: The scoping review methodology was based on the guidelines outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. The protocol for this scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PWMFB). The search strategy was documented using the protocol outlined within the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Databases used were Science Direct, Scopus, PubMed, Wiley, Directory of Open Access Journals; and health organizations such as the WHO. In addition, the Google search engine was used to search for grey matter. The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles in English on human studies for the period 2019-24.

Results: The search yielded a total of 529 articles from electronic databases and search engines. Twenty-nine articles were accepted for inclusion following the application of the study protocol. The majority of the articles were primary research papers.

Conclusions: The findings reveal that South Africa has measures in place to combat AMR; however, inconsistencies were found between the private and public health sectors, in addition to the lack of adherence to guidelines and limitations in AMR education among healthcare workers and students.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的抗菌药耐药性、抗生素处方实践和抗菌药管理:范围界定综述。
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个新兴的全球威胁,在低收入和中等收入国家具有明显的显著影响。滥用抗生素处方被认为是造成抗生素耐药性持续蔓延的关键因素。目的:全面绘制南非卫生保健机构AMR证据的公开数据,包括抗生素处方实践的探索和抗菌素管理倡议的实施。方法:范围评估方法基于Arksey和O'Malley概述的指南。本次范围审查的方案已在开放科学框架(https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/PWMFB)中注册。检索策略使用系统评价和范围界定meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA-ScR)中概述的协议进行记录。使用的数据库有Science Direct、Scopus、PubMed、Wiley、Directory of Open Access Journals;以及世界卫生组织等卫生组织。此外,使用谷歌搜索引擎搜索灰质。检索仅限于2019-24年期间同行评议的人类研究英文文章。结果:从电子数据库和搜索引擎中检索到共529篇论文。在应用研究方案后,29篇文章被纳入研究。大多数文章都是初级研究论文。结论:研究结果表明,南非已采取措施对抗抗生素耐药性;然而,私营和公共卫生部门之间存在不一致之处,除此之外,卫生保健工作者和学生中缺乏遵守准则和抗微生物药物耐药性教育方面也存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women's experiences of the assessment and management of urinary tract infections during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of free-text comments from a national survey in England. The UK Antimicrobial Registry (UKAR): an overview of the first 20 months of recruitment. Comparative effectiveness of adjunctive rifampicin versus gentamicin for prosthetic valve endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus. Which interventions optimize antibiotic prescribing in primary care in England? A survey and Qualitative Comparative Analysis of NHS Integrated Care Boards. Comparative study of common over-the-counter wound care products against early and mature biofilms of antibiotic-resistant wound pathogens.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1