Optimizing the integration of family physicians into cancer survivorship care in the BC Interior: a mixed methods study of physicians' opinions and experiences.
Brian D Hayes, Hannah G Young, Siavash Atrchian, Erica V Bennett, Elijah M K Haynes, Alissa Loader, Sarah McCorquodale, Matthew J Stork, Alissa Taki, Christine Voss
{"title":"Optimizing the integration of family physicians into cancer survivorship care in the BC Interior: a mixed methods study of physicians' opinions and experiences.","authors":"Brian D Hayes, Hannah G Young, Siavash Atrchian, Erica V Bennett, Elijah M K Haynes, Alissa Loader, Sarah McCorquodale, Matthew J Stork, Alissa Taki, Christine Voss","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01751-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>With cancer diagnoses increasing worldwide and the number of cancer survivors rising, family physicians are being increasingly relied upon to provide post-cancer treatment care and/or survivorship care. This mixed-method study explores and evaluates barriers and facilitators to optimizing family physician-led survivorship care in the largely rural Interior of British Columbia (BC), Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed-method approach consisting of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was utilized to explore family physician and oncologist perspectives on the current state of survivorship care for breast, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers within the BC Interior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concerns about family physician knowledge in some aspects of survivorship care were identified by both groups, with mixed responses regarding geographical factors, resources, and communication networks. Success was dependent on information from oncologists with more common cancer sites fitting the model better. There was significant concern for individuals with no family physician. Five frequently discussed facilitators were identified: (1) providing accessible survivorship guidelines, (2) standardized discharge summaries (i.e., survivorship care plans), (3) clear points-of-contact at cancer care centers, (4) more educational opportunities, and (5) compatible electronic supports between care providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the model of family physician-led survivorship care was supported by family physicians and oncologists within the BC Interior, although success was dependent on several factors. Identifying the perspectives of physicians directly involved in the survivorship care pathway will be instrumental in developing and implementing solutions that will succeed within the BC Interior and similar regions. Implication to for Cancer Survivors We hope that the improvements to interprofessional cooperation driven by our research may improve the quality and continuity of care received by cancer survivors in British Columbia and beyond. IMPLICATION TO CANCER SURVIVORS: We hope that the improvements to interprofessional cooperation driven by our research may improve the quality and continuity of care received by cancer survivors in British Columbia and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01751-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: With cancer diagnoses increasing worldwide and the number of cancer survivors rising, family physicians are being increasingly relied upon to provide post-cancer treatment care and/or survivorship care. This mixed-method study explores and evaluates barriers and facilitators to optimizing family physician-led survivorship care in the largely rural Interior of British Columbia (BC), Canada.
Methods: A mixed-method approach consisting of quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews was utilized to explore family physician and oncologist perspectives on the current state of survivorship care for breast, lung, prostate, and colorectal cancers within the BC Interior.
Results: Concerns about family physician knowledge in some aspects of survivorship care were identified by both groups, with mixed responses regarding geographical factors, resources, and communication networks. Success was dependent on information from oncologists with more common cancer sites fitting the model better. There was significant concern for individuals with no family physician. Five frequently discussed facilitators were identified: (1) providing accessible survivorship guidelines, (2) standardized discharge summaries (i.e., survivorship care plans), (3) clear points-of-contact at cancer care centers, (4) more educational opportunities, and (5) compatible electronic supports between care providers.
Conclusions: Overall, the model of family physician-led survivorship care was supported by family physicians and oncologists within the BC Interior, although success was dependent on several factors. Identifying the perspectives of physicians directly involved in the survivorship care pathway will be instrumental in developing and implementing solutions that will succeed within the BC Interior and similar regions. Implication to for Cancer Survivors We hope that the improvements to interprofessional cooperation driven by our research may improve the quality and continuity of care received by cancer survivors in British Columbia and beyond. IMPLICATION TO CANCER SURVIVORS: We hope that the improvements to interprofessional cooperation driven by our research may improve the quality and continuity of care received by cancer survivors in British Columbia and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.