Effectiveness of exercise interventions on functional outcomes in frail adults with a previous or current diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Cancer Survivorship Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s11764-025-01749-w
Maya El-Zahed, Lou-Anne Laura Carsault, Madison Lee Grande, Jasmin Espinoza-Alvarado, Brandon Cotton, Jordan Langille, Holly Edward, Jenna Smith-Turchyn
{"title":"Effectiveness of exercise interventions on functional outcomes in frail adults with a previous or current diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Maya El-Zahed, Lou-Anne Laura Carsault, Madison Lee Grande, Jasmin Espinoza-Alvarado, Brandon Cotton, Jordan Langille, Holly Edward, Jenna Smith-Turchyn","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01749-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise improves functional outcomes in individuals with frailty and individuals with cancer, but it is unknown how exercise impacts function in individuals with both cancer and frailty. This systematic review aimed to determine if adults with cancer who are frail and participate in an exercise program have better functional outcomes compared to those who do not.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases (OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EMCARE, and Ageline) were searched from inception to March 2024 for RCTs that investigated the impact of exercise on functional outcomes in individuals with cancer who are frail and ≥ 18 years. Title/abstract, full text review, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Cochrane ROB2 was used to assess risk of bias and GRADE for certainty of results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven RCTs with 1419 participants were included in this review. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference between intervention and control groups for submaximal walking tests (95% CI 0.24 (- 0.05-0.53), Short Physical Performance Battery (95% CI - 0.50 (- 1.15-0.15)), and grip strength (95% CI 1.83 (- 0.75 to 4.41). However, positive trends emerged for those participating in exercise programs related to submaximal walking test, grip strength, sit to stand, SPPB, and TUG scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are few RCTs investigating exercise in this population, with high heterogeneity of existing interventions. This leads to low certainty in the results of the current study.</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivorship: </strong>Cancer survivors and patients need to be screened for frailty and be engaged in appropriate exercise. Further work should be done investigating appropriate parameters of exercise interventions for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01749-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Exercise improves functional outcomes in individuals with frailty and individuals with cancer, but it is unknown how exercise impacts function in individuals with both cancer and frailty. This systematic review aimed to determine if adults with cancer who are frail and participate in an exercise program have better functional outcomes compared to those who do not.

Methods: Five databases (OVID Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EMCARE, and Ageline) were searched from inception to March 2024 for RCTs that investigated the impact of exercise on functional outcomes in individuals with cancer who are frail and ≥ 18 years. Title/abstract, full text review, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Cochrane ROB2 was used to assess risk of bias and GRADE for certainty of results.

Results: Eleven RCTs with 1419 participants were included in this review. Meta-analysis did not find a significant difference between intervention and control groups for submaximal walking tests (95% CI 0.24 (- 0.05-0.53), Short Physical Performance Battery (95% CI - 0.50 (- 1.15-0.15)), and grip strength (95% CI 1.83 (- 0.75 to 4.41). However, positive trends emerged for those participating in exercise programs related to submaximal walking test, grip strength, sit to stand, SPPB, and TUG scores.

Conclusion: There are few RCTs investigating exercise in this population, with high heterogeneity of existing interventions. This leads to low certainty in the results of the current study.

Implications for cancer survivorship: Cancer survivors and patients need to be screened for frailty and be engaged in appropriate exercise. Further work should be done investigating appropriate parameters of exercise interventions for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动干预对既往或当前诊断患有癌症的体弱成人功能性结果的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study on the psycho-oncological experiences of women navigating breast cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survivorship in Ethiopia. Relationship between incident cardiovascular disease and quality of life after a breast cancer diagnosis. Effectiveness of exercise interventions on functional outcomes in frail adults with a previous or current diagnosis of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Optimizing the integration of family physicians into cancer survivorship care in the BC Interior: a mixed methods study of physicians' opinions and experiences. Global prevalence and moderating factors of malnutrition in colorectal cancer survivors: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1