Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Older Adults: Development and Validation Study.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.2196/65492
SungMin Kim, Choonghee Park, Sunghyeon Park, Dai-Jin Kim, Ye-Seul Bae, Jae-Heon Kang, Ji-Won Chun
{"title":"Measuring Digital Health Literacy in Older Adults: Development and Validation Study.","authors":"SungMin Kim, Choonghee Park, Sunghyeon Park, Dai-Jin Kim, Ye-Seul Bae, Jae-Heon Kang, Ji-Won Chun","doi":"10.2196/65492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New health care services such as smart health care and digital therapeutics have greatly expanded. To effectively use these services, digital health literacy skills, involving the use of digital devices to explore and understand health information, are important. Older adults, requiring consistent health management highlight the need for enhanced digital health literacy skills. To address this issue, it is imperative to develop methods to assess older adults' digital health literacy levels.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop a tool to measure digital health literacy. To this end, it reviewed existing literature to identify the components of digital health literacy, drafted preliminary items, and developed a scale using a representative sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a primary survey targeting 600 adults aged 55-75 years and performed an exploratory factor analysis on 74 preliminary items. Items with low factor loadings were removed, and their contents were modified to enhance their validity. Then, we conducted a secondary survey with 400 participants to perform exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A digital health literacy scale consisting of 25 items was developed, comprising 4 subfactors: use of digital devices, understanding health information, use and decision regarding health information, and use intention. The model fit indices indicated excellent structural validity (Tucker-Lewis Index=0.924, comparative fit index=0.916, root-mean-square error of approximation=0.088, standardized root-mean-square residual=0.044). High convergent validity (average variance extracted>0.5) and reliability (composite reliability>0.7) were observed within each factor. Discriminant validity was also confirmed as the square root of the average variance extracted was greater than the correlation coefficients between the factors. This scale demonstrates high reliability and excellent structural validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is a significant first step toward enhancing digital health literacy among older adults by developing an appropriate tool for measuring digital health literacy. We expect this study to contribute to the future provision of tailored education and treatment based on individual literacy levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e65492"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New health care services such as smart health care and digital therapeutics have greatly expanded. To effectively use these services, digital health literacy skills, involving the use of digital devices to explore and understand health information, are important. Older adults, requiring consistent health management highlight the need for enhanced digital health literacy skills. To address this issue, it is imperative to develop methods to assess older adults' digital health literacy levels.

Objective: This study aimed to develop a tool to measure digital health literacy. To this end, it reviewed existing literature to identify the components of digital health literacy, drafted preliminary items, and developed a scale using a representative sample.

Methods: We conducted a primary survey targeting 600 adults aged 55-75 years and performed an exploratory factor analysis on 74 preliminary items. Items with low factor loadings were removed, and their contents were modified to enhance their validity. Then, we conducted a secondary survey with 400 participants to perform exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.

Results: A digital health literacy scale consisting of 25 items was developed, comprising 4 subfactors: use of digital devices, understanding health information, use and decision regarding health information, and use intention. The model fit indices indicated excellent structural validity (Tucker-Lewis Index=0.924, comparative fit index=0.916, root-mean-square error of approximation=0.088, standardized root-mean-square residual=0.044). High convergent validity (average variance extracted>0.5) and reliability (composite reliability>0.7) were observed within each factor. Discriminant validity was also confirmed as the square root of the average variance extracted was greater than the correlation coefficients between the factors. This scale demonstrates high reliability and excellent structural validity.

Conclusions: This study is a significant first step toward enhancing digital health literacy among older adults by developing an appropriate tool for measuring digital health literacy. We expect this study to contribute to the future provision of tailored education and treatment based on individual literacy levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量老年人的数字健康素养:发展和验证研究。
背景:智能医疗和数字治疗等新型医疗服务已经大大扩展。为了有效利用这些服务,数字卫生素养技能(包括使用数字设备探索和理解卫生信息)非常重要。需要持续健康管理的老年人强调需要提高数字健康素养技能。为了解决这一问题,必须制定评估老年人数字健康素养水平的方法。目的:本研究旨在开发一种测量数字健康素养的工具。为此,它审查了现有文献,以确定数字卫生素养的组成部分,起草了初步项目,并使用代表性样本制定了量表。方法:对600名55 ~ 75岁成人进行初步调查,对74项初步项目进行探索性因子分析。去除低因子负荷的条目,并对其内容进行修改以提高其效度。然后,我们对400名参与者进行了二次调查,进行了探索性和验证性因素分析。结果:编制了数字健康素养量表,共25项,包括数字设备的使用、健康信息的理解、健康信息的使用和决策、使用意向4个子因素。模型拟合指标具有良好的结构效度(Tucker-Lewis指数=0.924,比较拟合指数=0.916,近似均方根误差=0.088,标准化均方根残差=0.044)。各因子具有较高的收敛效度(提取的平均方差>0.5)和信度(复合信度>0.7)。当提取的平均方差的平方根大于各因素之间的相关系数时,也证实了判别效度。该量表具有较高的信度和良好的结构效度。结论:通过开发一种适当的测量数字健康素养的工具,本研究是朝着提高老年人数字健康素养迈出的重要的第一步。我们希望这项研究有助于未来提供基于个人识字水平的量身定制的教育和治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Effectiveness of Immersive Virtual Reality Exercise Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hospital-at-Home: New Technology Brings Acute Care to Patients' Homes. Detecting Uncoded Self-Harm in Veterans' Electronic Health Records Using Positive and Unlabeled Learning: Retrospective Observational Study. The Need for Continued Investment in Digital Pain Assessment. Long-Term Outcomes, Moderators, and Predictors in Online Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for People With Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1