Comparison of 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array and electro-optical synergy for post-acne erythema: a prospective, randomized, split-face trial.
{"title":"Comparison of 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array and electro-optical synergy for post-acne erythema: a prospective, randomized, split-face trial.","authors":"Xinyi Jing, JianWen Ren, Junlan Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04325-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative data regarding the effectiveness of the 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) versus traditional electro-optical synergy (ELOS) for treating post-acne erythema (PAE) are limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and ELOS in the treatment of PAE. This prospective, randomized, split-face trial enrolled 20 patients with PAE, primarily of darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI). Patients were randomly assigned to receive P-MLA treatment on one side of the face, and ELOS treatment on the other side. Three treatments were administered at 4-week intervals, with follow-up conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Standardized photographs were obtained using the VISIA system. Efficacy was assessed based on improvements in PAE lesion counts, clinical erythema assessment, VISIA skin analysis data, and patient-reported satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded. Both the P-MLA and ELOS groups showed significant reductions in erythema, with the P-MLA group demonstrating a notably greater decrease in PAE lesion counts and a higher clinical response rate at week 12 than the ELOS group. VISIA analysis revealed a greater reduction in red zone scores for the P-MLA group, alongside significant improvements in wrinkles and pigmentation. Patient satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups, with an overall satisfaction rate of 94.74%. Adverse events, including erythema duration, edema, and pain, were similar across both groups, with no serious complications observed. P-MLA demonstrates superior efficacy and lower risk of adverse effects than ELOS in PAE treatment among Asian patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04325-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Comparative data regarding the effectiveness of the 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) versus traditional electro-optical synergy (ELOS) for treating post-acne erythema (PAE) are limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and ELOS in the treatment of PAE. This prospective, randomized, split-face trial enrolled 20 patients with PAE, primarily of darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI). Patients were randomly assigned to receive P-MLA treatment on one side of the face, and ELOS treatment on the other side. Three treatments were administered at 4-week intervals, with follow-up conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Standardized photographs were obtained using the VISIA system. Efficacy was assessed based on improvements in PAE lesion counts, clinical erythema assessment, VISIA skin analysis data, and patient-reported satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded. Both the P-MLA and ELOS groups showed significant reductions in erythema, with the P-MLA group demonstrating a notably greater decrease in PAE lesion counts and a higher clinical response rate at week 12 than the ELOS group. VISIA analysis revealed a greater reduction in red zone scores for the P-MLA group, alongside significant improvements in wrinkles and pigmentation. Patient satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups, with an overall satisfaction rate of 94.74%. Adverse events, including erythema duration, edema, and pain, were similar across both groups, with no serious complications observed. P-MLA demonstrates superior efficacy and lower risk of adverse effects than ELOS in PAE treatment among Asian patients.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics.
The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.