Comparison of 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array and electro-optical synergy for post-acne erythema: a prospective, randomized, split-face trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Lasers in Medical Science Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s10103-025-04325-x
Xinyi Jing, JianWen Ren, Junlan Yang
{"title":"Comparison of 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array and electro-optical synergy for post-acne erythema: a prospective, randomized, split-face trial.","authors":"Xinyi Jing, JianWen Ren, Junlan Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04325-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative data regarding the effectiveness of the 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) versus traditional electro-optical synergy (ELOS) for treating post-acne erythema (PAE) are limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and ELOS in the treatment of PAE. This prospective, randomized, split-face trial enrolled 20 patients with PAE, primarily of darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI). Patients were randomly assigned to receive P-MLA treatment on one side of the face, and ELOS treatment on the other side. Three treatments were administered at 4-week intervals, with follow-up conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Standardized photographs were obtained using the VISIA system. Efficacy was assessed based on improvements in PAE lesion counts, clinical erythema assessment, VISIA skin analysis data, and patient-reported satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded. Both the P-MLA and ELOS groups showed significant reductions in erythema, with the P-MLA group demonstrating a notably greater decrease in PAE lesion counts and a higher clinical response rate at week 12 than the ELOS group. VISIA analysis revealed a greater reduction in red zone scores for the P-MLA group, alongside significant improvements in wrinkles and pigmentation. Patient satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups, with an overall satisfaction rate of 94.74%. Adverse events, including erythema duration, edema, and pain, were similar across both groups, with no serious complications observed. P-MLA demonstrates superior efficacy and lower risk of adverse effects than ELOS in PAE treatment among Asian patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04325-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparative data regarding the effectiveness of the 1064-nm Nd: YAG picosecond laser with fractional micro-lens array (P-MLA) versus traditional electro-optical synergy (ELOS) for treating post-acne erythema (PAE) are limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of P-MLA and ELOS in the treatment of PAE. This prospective, randomized, split-face trial enrolled 20 patients with PAE, primarily of darker skin tones (Fitzpatrick skin types III-VI). Patients were randomly assigned to receive P-MLA treatment on one side of the face, and ELOS treatment on the other side. Three treatments were administered at 4-week intervals, with follow-up conducted at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. Standardized photographs were obtained using the VISIA system. Efficacy was assessed based on improvements in PAE lesion counts, clinical erythema assessment, VISIA skin analysis data, and patient-reported satisfaction. Adverse events were recorded. Both the P-MLA and ELOS groups showed significant reductions in erythema, with the P-MLA group demonstrating a notably greater decrease in PAE lesion counts and a higher clinical response rate at week 12 than the ELOS group. VISIA analysis revealed a greater reduction in red zone scores for the P-MLA group, alongside significant improvements in wrinkles and pigmentation. Patient satisfaction scores were comparable between the two groups, with an overall satisfaction rate of 94.74%. Adverse events, including erythema duration, edema, and pain, were similar across both groups, with no serious complications observed. P-MLA demonstrates superior efficacy and lower risk of adverse effects than ELOS in PAE treatment among Asian patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1064 nm Nd:YAG 皮秒激光配合点阵式微透镜阵列(P-MLA)与传统的光电协同作用(ELOS)治疗痤疮后红斑(PAE)的疗效比较数据有限。因此,我们旨在比较 P-MLA 和 ELOS 治疗 PAE 的有效性和安全性。这项前瞻性、随机、分面试验共招募了 20 名 PAE 患者,主要是肤色较深(菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型 III-VI)的患者。患者被随机分配到面部一侧接受 P-MLA 治疗,另一侧接受 ELOS 治疗。每隔 4 周进行三次治疗,分别在第 0、4、8 和 12 周进行随访。使用 VISIA 系统拍摄标准化照片。疗效评估基于 PAE 病损计数的改善、临床红斑评估、VISIA 皮肤分析数据以及患者报告的满意度。此外,还记录了不良事件。P-MLA组和ELOS组的红斑均有显著减少,其中P-MLA组的PAE皮损计数减少幅度明显大于ELOS组,第12周时的临床反应率也高于ELOS组。VISIA分析显示,P-MLA组的红区评分下降幅度更大,同时皱纹和色素沉着也有显著改善。两组患者的满意度得分相当,总体满意度为94.74%。两组的不良反应(包括红斑持续时间、水肿和疼痛)相似,均未发现严重并发症。在亚洲患者的 PAE 治疗中,P-MLA 显示出比 ELOS 更优越的疗效和更低的不良反应风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
期刊最新文献
3D-printed surface coated with natural photosensitizer for photodynamic inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using visible light. Discussion on the comparison of Raman spectroscopy and cardiovascular disease-related imaging techniques and the future applications of Raman technology: a systematic review. Application of Z-scan technique in detecting circulating free DNA for prostate cancer diagnosis and monitoring. Background and illustrative example of the DMAIC quality improvement process for laser resurfacing and tattoo removal procedures. The ethical considerations of artificial intelligence hallucination and misinformation in dermatological and medical laser documentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1