Effectiveness of My Tools for Care-in Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105484
Hannah M O'Rourke, Jennifer Swindle, Pamela Baxter, Shelley Peacock, Genevieve Thompson, Sunita Ghosh, Dorothy Chacinski, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Véronique Dubé, Wendy Duggleby
{"title":"Effectiveness of My Tools for Care-in Care: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hannah M O'Rourke, Jennifer Swindle, Pamela Baxter, Shelley Peacock, Genevieve Thompson, Sunita Ghosh, Dorothy Chacinski, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Véronique Dubé, Wendy Duggleby","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Few supports exist for family/friend care partners when the care recipient is a person living with dementia in a care home. This study assessed the effectiveness of My Tools for Care-In Care (MT4C-In Care), a self-administered, web-based psychoeducational intervention.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The overall study was a mixed methods pragmatic randomized controlled trial, with concurrent process evaluation and an active (educational) control. The intervention group received a link to MT4C-In Care for 2 months.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Participants were eligible if they were an adult (≥18 years of age) who provided care to an older person (≥65 years of age) living with dementia in a care home in Canada (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, or Ontario). An email address and internet access were required to participate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Process evaluation included a study participation tracking form and a checklist to assess use of MT4C-In Care. We completed telephone interviews (February 2020 to October 2021) at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months to assess outcomes of social support, hope, grief, self-efficacy, loneliness, and mental health. In an intention-to-treat analysis, generalized estimating equations models were used to assess intervention impact, adjusting for covariates. Sensitivity analysis assessed whether exclusion of nonusers impacted the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants (N = 234) were primarily white women, and spouses or an adult child of the person living with dementia. No effect between groups was observed for the primary outcome (mental health). We observed a small benefit of MT4C-In Care for a secondary outcome, social support. Use of MT4C-In Care within the intervention group was low (∼1 h/mo). Dropping nonusers from the analysis did not have a substantial impact on the main conclusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Future research will explore use of MT4C-In Care by more diverse participant groups, and will clarify its core mechanisms, advancing understanding of impacts of psychoeducational interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Few supports exist for family/friend care partners when the care recipient is a person living with dementia in a care home. This study assessed the effectiveness of My Tools for Care-In Care (MT4C-In Care), a self-administered, web-based psychoeducational intervention.

Design: The overall study was a mixed methods pragmatic randomized controlled trial, with concurrent process evaluation and an active (educational) control. The intervention group received a link to MT4C-In Care for 2 months.

Setting and participants: Participants were eligible if they were an adult (≥18 years of age) who provided care to an older person (≥65 years of age) living with dementia in a care home in Canada (Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, or Ontario). An email address and internet access were required to participate.

Methods: Process evaluation included a study participation tracking form and a checklist to assess use of MT4C-In Care. We completed telephone interviews (February 2020 to October 2021) at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months to assess outcomes of social support, hope, grief, self-efficacy, loneliness, and mental health. In an intention-to-treat analysis, generalized estimating equations models were used to assess intervention impact, adjusting for covariates. Sensitivity analysis assessed whether exclusion of nonusers impacted the results.

Results: Participants (N = 234) were primarily white women, and spouses or an adult child of the person living with dementia. No effect between groups was observed for the primary outcome (mental health). We observed a small benefit of MT4C-In Care for a secondary outcome, social support. Use of MT4C-In Care within the intervention group was low (∼1 h/mo). Dropping nonusers from the analysis did not have a substantial impact on the main conclusions.

Conclusions and implications: Future research will explore use of MT4C-In Care by more diverse participant groups, and will clarify its core mechanisms, advancing understanding of impacts of psychoeducational interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome Improves Agitation and Sleep in Persons With Dementia: A Randomized Trial. Editorial Board Table of Contents Clinical Predictors of Mortality in People with Severe Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia A Team Coaching Intervention for Dementia Care: Acceptability and Feasibility Study in Care Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1