Cognitive presentation at psychosis onset through premorbid deterioration and exposure to environmental risk factors.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1017/S0033291724003507
Laura Ferraro, Marta Di Forti, Daniele La Barbera, Caterina La Cascia, Craig Morgan, Giada Tripoli, Hannah Jongsma, Fabio Seminerio, Crocettarachele Sartorio, Lucia Sideli, Ilaria Tarricone, Anna Lisa Carloni, Andrei Szoke, Baptiste Pignon, Miguel Bernardo, Lieuwe de Haan, Celso Arango, Eva Velthorst, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, James Kirkbride, Bart P F Rutten, Antonio Lasalvia, Sarah Tosato, Cristina Marta Del Ben, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Julio Bobes, Manuel Arrojo, Andrea Tortelli, Peter Jones, Jean-Paul Selten, Jim van Os, Robin Murray, Diego Quattrone, Evangelos Vassos
{"title":"Cognitive presentation at psychosis onset through premorbid deterioration and exposure to environmental risk factors.","authors":"Laura Ferraro, Marta Di Forti, Daniele La Barbera, Caterina La Cascia, Craig Morgan, Giada Tripoli, Hannah Jongsma, Fabio Seminerio, Crocettarachele Sartorio, Lucia Sideli, Ilaria Tarricone, Anna Lisa Carloni, Andrei Szoke, Baptiste Pignon, Miguel Bernardo, Lieuwe de Haan, Celso Arango, Eva Velthorst, Charlotte Gayer-Anderson, James Kirkbride, Bart P F Rutten, Antonio Lasalvia, Sarah Tosato, Cristina Marta Del Ben, Paulo Rossi Menezes, Julio Bobes, Manuel Arrojo, Andrea Tortelli, Peter Jones, Jean-Paul Selten, Jim van Os, Robin Murray, Diego Quattrone, Evangelos Vassos","doi":"10.1017/S0033291724003507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies identified clusters of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients based on cognition and premorbid adjustment. This study examined a range of socio-environmental risk factors associated with clusters of FEP, aiming a) to compare clusters of FEP and community controls using the Maudsley Environmental Risk Score for psychosis (ERS), a weighted sum of the following risks: paternal age, childhood adversities, cannabis use, and ethnic minority membership; b) to explore the putative differences in specific environmental risk factors in distinguishing within patient clusters and from controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A univariable general linear model (GLS) compared the ERS between 1,263 community controls and clusters derived from 802 FEP patients, namely, low (n = 223) and high-cognitive-functioning (n = 205), intermediate (n = 224) and deteriorating (n = 150), from the EU-GEI study. A multivariable GLS compared clusters and controls by different exposures included in the ERS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ERS was higher in all clusters compared to controls, mostly in the deteriorating (<b>β</b>=2.8, 95% CI 2.3 3.4<sub>,</sub> η<sup>2</sup> = 0.049) and the low-cognitive-functioning cluster (<b>β</b>=2.4, 95% CI 1.9 2.8, η<sup>2</sup> = 0.049) and distinguished them from the cluster with high-cognitive-functioning. The deteriorating cluster had higher cannabis exposure (mean<sub>difference</sub> = 0.48, 95% CI 0.49 0.91) than the intermediate having identical IQ, and more people from an ethnic minority (mean<sub>difference</sub> = 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 1.29) compared to the high-cognitive-functioning cluster.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High exposure to environmental risk factors might result in cognitive impairment and lower-than-expected functioning in individuals at the onset of psychosis. Some patients' trajectories involved risk factors that could be modified by tailored interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"55 ","pages":"e12"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291724003507","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies identified clusters of first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients based on cognition and premorbid adjustment. This study examined a range of socio-environmental risk factors associated with clusters of FEP, aiming a) to compare clusters of FEP and community controls using the Maudsley Environmental Risk Score for psychosis (ERS), a weighted sum of the following risks: paternal age, childhood adversities, cannabis use, and ethnic minority membership; b) to explore the putative differences in specific environmental risk factors in distinguishing within patient clusters and from controls.

Methods: A univariable general linear model (GLS) compared the ERS between 1,263 community controls and clusters derived from 802 FEP patients, namely, low (n = 223) and high-cognitive-functioning (n = 205), intermediate (n = 224) and deteriorating (n = 150), from the EU-GEI study. A multivariable GLS compared clusters and controls by different exposures included in the ERS.

Results: The ERS was higher in all clusters compared to controls, mostly in the deteriorating (β=2.8, 95% CI 2.3 3.4, η2 = 0.049) and the low-cognitive-functioning cluster (β=2.4, 95% CI 1.9 2.8, η2 = 0.049) and distinguished them from the cluster with high-cognitive-functioning. The deteriorating cluster had higher cannabis exposure (meandifference = 0.48, 95% CI 0.49 0.91) than the intermediate having identical IQ, and more people from an ethnic minority (meandifference = 0.77, 95% CI 0.24 1.29) compared to the high-cognitive-functioning cluster.

Conclusions: High exposure to environmental risk factors might result in cognitive impairment and lower-than-expected functioning in individuals at the onset of psychosis. Some patients' trajectories involved risk factors that could be modified by tailored interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
背景:以往的研究根据认知和病前适应情况确定了首发精神病(FEP)患者群。本研究考察了与首发精神病患者集群相关的一系列社会环境风险因素,旨在:(a)使用莫兹利精神病环境风险评分(ERS)比较首发精神病患者集群和社区对照组,ERS是以下风险的加权总和:父亲年龄、童年逆境、大麻使用和少数民族成员身份;(b)探讨特定环境风险因素在区分患者集群内部和对照组方面可能存在的差异:单变量一般线性模型(GLS)比较了1263名社区对照组和802名FEP患者群组(即低认知功能(223人)和高认知功能(205人)、中等认知功能(224人)和恶化认知功能(150人))之间的ERS。一项多变量 GLS 根据 ERS 所包含的不同暴露因素对分组和对照组进行了比较:与对照组相比,所有群组的 ERS 均较高,其中以病情恶化群组(β=2.8,95% CI 2.3 3.4,η2 = 0.049)和认知功能低下群组(β=2.4,95% CI 1.9 2.8,η2 = 0.049)的 ERS 较高,并将其与认知功能低下群组区分开来。与智商相同的中间组相比,智商下降组的大麻接触率更高(meandifference = 0.48,95% CI 0.49 0.91),与认知功能高组相比,来自少数民族的人数更多(meandifference = 0.77,95% CI 0.24 1.29):结论:大量暴露于环境风险因素可能会导致认知功能受损,并使患者在精神病发病初期的功能低于预期。一些患者的发病轨迹涉及风险因素,可以通过有针对性的干预措施加以改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Cognitive presentation at psychosis onset through premorbid deterioration and exposure to environmental risk factors. Deconstructing the nature of emotion regulation impairments at the identification, selection, and implementation stages in individuals at clinical high-risk for psychosis. Disrupted functional connectivity of the emotion regulation network in major depressive disorder and its association with symptom improvement: A multisite resting-state functional MRI study. Altered food liking in depression is driven by macronutrient composition. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation with adjunctive D-cycloserine rapidly resolves suicidal ideation and decreases implicit association with death/suicide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1