Li Mingsheng, Ma Xiangjie, Liu Ya, Wei Xiao, Sun Quanfu, Cheng Jinsheng
{"title":"Evaluation of the self-shielding characteristics of an innovative radiosurgical system ZAP-X.","authors":"Li Mingsheng, Ma Xiangjie, Liu Ya, Wei Xiao, Sun Quanfu, Cheng Jinsheng","doi":"10.1093/rpd/ncaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation level of a ZAP-X self-shielding system by comparing it with the requirements of the Chinese radiation protection standards and to provide a practical solution for the operation of ZAP-X in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under the maximum workload of the ZAP-X system, the weekly radiation dose and the instantaneous dose rate (IDR) outside the safety perimeter of the ZAP-X system were compared to the requirements of relevant standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The maximum weekly and annual dose equivalents, derived from the IDRs and accumulative doses, were as follows:1.99 μSv/week and 0.10 mSv/year, and 3.47 μSv/week and 0.17 mSv/year, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The radiation levels around the ZAP-X system meet the requirements of the weekly and annual dose constraints in relevant Chinese standards. The IDRs generated by the ZAP-X system do not meet the requirements of the existing radiation protection standards. A viable solution is to adjust the safety perimeter to comply with existing standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":20795,"journal":{"name":"Radiation protection dosimetry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation protection dosimetry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncaf007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation level of a ZAP-X self-shielding system by comparing it with the requirements of the Chinese radiation protection standards and to provide a practical solution for the operation of ZAP-X in China.
Methods: Under the maximum workload of the ZAP-X system, the weekly radiation dose and the instantaneous dose rate (IDR) outside the safety perimeter of the ZAP-X system were compared to the requirements of relevant standards.
Results: The maximum weekly and annual dose equivalents, derived from the IDRs and accumulative doses, were as follows:1.99 μSv/week and 0.10 mSv/year, and 3.47 μSv/week and 0.17 mSv/year, respectively.
Conclusion: The radiation levels around the ZAP-X system meet the requirements of the weekly and annual dose constraints in relevant Chinese standards. The IDRs generated by the ZAP-X system do not meet the requirements of the existing radiation protection standards. A viable solution is to adjust the safety perimeter to comply with existing standards.
期刊介绍:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry covers all aspects of personal and environmental dosimetry and monitoring, for both ionising and non-ionising radiations. This includes biological aspects, physical concepts, biophysical dosimetry, external and internal personal dosimetry and monitoring, environmental and workplace monitoring, accident dosimetry, and dosimetry related to the protection of patients. Particular emphasis is placed on papers covering the fundamentals of dosimetry; units, radiation quantities and conversion factors. Papers covering archaeological dating are included only if the fundamental measurement method or technique, such as thermoluminescence, has direct application to personal dosimetry measurements. Papers covering the dosimetric aspects of radon or other naturally occurring radioactive materials and low level radiation are included. Animal experiments and ecological sample measurements are not included unless there is a significant relevant content reason.