Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Caliber and Number of Passes in Epitendinous Repair.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume Pub Date : 2025-02-02 DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.021
David Cardenas, Anca Dogaroiu, Muhammad Harirah, Andrew Y Zhang, Andrei Odobescu, Douglas M Sammer
{"title":"Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Caliber and Number of Passes in Epitendinous Repair.","authors":"David Cardenas, Anca Dogaroiu, Muhammad Harirah, Andrew Y Zhang, Andrei Odobescu, Douglas M Sammer","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The epitendinous suture is a critical part of flexor tendon repair. In addition to smoothing the repair site, it augments repair strength and increases gap resistance. This study aimed to determine whether increasing the number of passes or increasing suture caliber would improve the strength (primary outcome), 2 mm gap resistance, or stiffness of a simple running epitendinous suture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 30 flexor pollicis longus (FPL), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons were harvested from three cadavers, and transverse tendon lacerations were produced. Tendons were repaired with only an epitendinous suture (no core suture) in three groups: 6-0 Prolene with six passes, 5-0 Prolene with six passes, or 5-0 Prolene with six passes. Epitendinous repair strength was tested using a materials testing machine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of eight passes had significantly greater ultimate tensile strength than six passes (21 +/- 7 N vs 14 +/- 5 N). Although 5-0 suture had a higher average ultimate tensile strength than 6-0 suture, this difference was not statistically significant (14 N +/- 5 vs 10 N +/- 3). Failure mode for all groups was most often suture tear-through.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A simple epitendinous suture using eight passes provides almost 50% more epitendinous repair strength and greater 2 mm gap resistance than six passes when using 5-0 Prolene.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>When performing a simple running epitendinous repair to augment a core flexor tendon repair, the surgeon should consider the additional strength and gap resistance provided by eight passes compared to six.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The epitendinous suture is a critical part of flexor tendon repair. In addition to smoothing the repair site, it augments repair strength and increases gap resistance. This study aimed to determine whether increasing the number of passes or increasing suture caliber would improve the strength (primary outcome), 2 mm gap resistance, or stiffness of a simple running epitendinous suture.

Methods: A total of 30 flexor pollicis longus (FPL), flexor digitorum profundus (FDP), and flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) tendons were harvested from three cadavers, and transverse tendon lacerations were produced. Tendons were repaired with only an epitendinous suture (no core suture) in three groups: 6-0 Prolene with six passes, 5-0 Prolene with six passes, or 5-0 Prolene with six passes. Epitendinous repair strength was tested using a materials testing machine.

Results: The use of eight passes had significantly greater ultimate tensile strength than six passes (21 +/- 7 N vs 14 +/- 5 N). Although 5-0 suture had a higher average ultimate tensile strength than 6-0 suture, this difference was not statistically significant (14 N +/- 5 vs 10 N +/- 3). Failure mode for all groups was most often suture tear-through.

Conclusions: A simple epitendinous suture using eight passes provides almost 50% more epitendinous repair strength and greater 2 mm gap resistance than six passes when using 5-0 Prolene.

Clinical relevance: When performing a simple running epitendinous repair to augment a core flexor tendon repair, the surgeon should consider the additional strength and gap resistance provided by eight passes compared to six.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of a Modified Bilhaut-Cloquet Procedure Using a Neurovascular Island Flap for Treatment of Radially Deviated Thumb Polydactyly With Hypoplasia. Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Caliber and Number of Passes in Epitendinous Repair. Reliability and Validity of the Ten Test for the Assessment of Digit Sensation. Development of International Quality Measures Targeting Low-Value Care in Hand Surgery. Replication of Coupled Movements of the Wrist: A Cadaveric Study of Total Wrist Arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1