The relationship between hemolysis and I-index: investigating its use as a screening test in hyperbilirubinemia.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1080/00365513.2025.2460201
Hatice Bozkurt Yavuz
{"title":"The relationship between hemolysis and I-index: investigating its use as a screening test in hyperbilirubinemia.","authors":"Hatice Bozkurt Yavuz","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2460201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemolysis (H-index) and icteric indexes (I-index) are widely used in clinical laboratories to control interferences. Since I-index correlates with bilirubin, it can aid in deciding whether to analyze bilirubin levels. The study aims to evaluate I-index use for this purpose, considering H-index interference on I-index. This retrospective study included H-index, I-index and total bilirubin results, all analyzed using the Mindray BS800M. Total bilirubin was analyzed using the Vanadate oxidase method. Patients were categorized according to their H-index values in multiples of 0.5. Group-0 had the lowest hemolysis (<0.5 g/L), and Group-10 had the highest hemolysis (>5 g/L), with a total of 11 groups. ROC analysis determined optimal I-index cut-offs to differentiate normal and abnormal bilirubin levels, calculating PPV, NPV, specificity and sensitivity. Indexes of 55,306 patients and total bilirubin results of 26,781 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the groups in pairwise comparison for bilirubin results but significant differences were observed in I-index values. When the I-index values were examined, there were significant differences between Group 0,1,2,3,4, and all groups from 0 to 10 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). As hemolysis increased, the I-index cutoff values decreased. While the cut-off values for Group-0 and Group-4 ranged from 16.70 to 14.15 μmol/L, in Group-5 (hemolysis 2.5-3 g/L), the cut-off was 6.50 μmol/L, in Group-6 and Group-7, it was -2.35 μmol/L. In Group-10, this value dropped to -42.55 μmol/L. Our findings suggest using the I-index to spot hyperbilirubinemia and save on testing. However, different cut-off values should be calculated according to the hemolysis value.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2460201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemolysis (H-index) and icteric indexes (I-index) are widely used in clinical laboratories to control interferences. Since I-index correlates with bilirubin, it can aid in deciding whether to analyze bilirubin levels. The study aims to evaluate I-index use for this purpose, considering H-index interference on I-index. This retrospective study included H-index, I-index and total bilirubin results, all analyzed using the Mindray BS800M. Total bilirubin was analyzed using the Vanadate oxidase method. Patients were categorized according to their H-index values in multiples of 0.5. Group-0 had the lowest hemolysis (<0.5 g/L), and Group-10 had the highest hemolysis (>5 g/L), with a total of 11 groups. ROC analysis determined optimal I-index cut-offs to differentiate normal and abnormal bilirubin levels, calculating PPV, NPV, specificity and sensitivity. Indexes of 55,306 patients and total bilirubin results of 26,781 patients were evaluated. There was no significant difference between the groups in pairwise comparison for bilirubin results but significant differences were observed in I-index values. When the I-index values were examined, there were significant differences between Group 0,1,2,3,4, and all groups from 0 to 10 (p < 0.001). As hemolysis increased, the I-index cutoff values decreased. While the cut-off values for Group-0 and Group-4 ranged from 16.70 to 14.15 μmol/L, in Group-5 (hemolysis 2.5-3 g/L), the cut-off was 6.50 μmol/L, in Group-6 and Group-7, it was -2.35 μmol/L. In Group-10, this value dropped to -42.55 μmol/L. Our findings suggest using the I-index to spot hyperbilirubinemia and save on testing. However, different cut-off values should be calculated according to the hemolysis value.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
期刊最新文献
The relationship between hemolysis and I-index: investigating its use as a screening test in hyperbilirubinemia. Evaluating agreement between separate capillary sampling sites and venous concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate measured by a point-of-care device and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. A pilot study on the relationship between zinc deficiency and anthropometric and metabolic parameters in obese adults in Serbia. Total and ionized calcium concentrations in human cerebrospinal fluid. Methadone metabolite (EDDP) crystals in urine: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1