Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/17483107.2025.2459884
Lisa K Kenyon, Bethany M Sloane, Lauren N Beers, Katelyn J Chung, Jessica Doty, Amberlyn R Erlenbeck, Madeline Herrenkohl, Samuel W Logan, Heather A Feldner
{"title":"Tiny drivers, big decisions: parental perceptions and experiences of power mobility device trials for young children with cerebral palsy.","authors":"Lisa K Kenyon, Bethany M Sloane, Lauren N Beers, Katelyn J Chung, Jessica Doty, Amberlyn R Erlenbeck, Madeline Herrenkohl, Samuel W Logan, Heather A Feldner","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2459884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore parental perceptions and experiences at three timepoints [baseline (T0), post-intervention period 1 (T1), and post-intervention period 2 (T2)] across a 16-week study involving their children's use of two power mobility (PM) devices: an Explorer Mini (EM) and a modified ride-on car (mROC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data for this phenomenological qualitative study were gathered as part of a multi-site randomized, counterbalanced AB crossover clinical trial, wherein all child participants used PM device A (EM) and PM device B (mROC) for eight weeks each. Trained researchers conducted in-person, audio-recorded semi-structured parental interviews at T0, T1, and T2. Data from each timepoint were individually analysed using the constant comparative method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-four child-parent participant dyads partook in the larger clinical trial. The parent participant within each dyad completed three qualitative interviews (one per timepoint), resulting in a total of 72 interviews (24 at each timepoint). At each timepoint, unique themes representing the parent participants' journey across the study emerged. Main themes were: T0 - \"Anticipation\", \"Adjustment\", and \"Recognizing Strengths\"; T1 - \"Benefits and Barriers\", \"Expectations\", and \"Importance of Device Trials\"; T2 - \"One Size Doesn't Fit All, But All Are Worth Trying\", \"Environmental Affordances Enable Learning\", and \"Enabling Abilities and Participation\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides insights into how parental perceptions about power mobility may shift over time, thereby assisting clinicians in implementing ON Time Mobility. The study further highlights how PM use can positively impact socialization and participation and how PM use may provide children with a mobile learning environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1566-1573"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2459884","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore parental perceptions and experiences at three timepoints [baseline (T0), post-intervention period 1 (T1), and post-intervention period 2 (T2)] across a 16-week study involving their children's use of two power mobility (PM) devices: an Explorer Mini (EM) and a modified ride-on car (mROC).

Materials and methods: Data for this phenomenological qualitative study were gathered as part of a multi-site randomized, counterbalanced AB crossover clinical trial, wherein all child participants used PM device A (EM) and PM device B (mROC) for eight weeks each. Trained researchers conducted in-person, audio-recorded semi-structured parental interviews at T0, T1, and T2. Data from each timepoint were individually analysed using the constant comparative method.

Results: Twenty-four child-parent participant dyads partook in the larger clinical trial. The parent participant within each dyad completed three qualitative interviews (one per timepoint), resulting in a total of 72 interviews (24 at each timepoint). At each timepoint, unique themes representing the parent participants' journey across the study emerged. Main themes were: T0 - "Anticipation", "Adjustment", and "Recognizing Strengths"; T1 - "Benefits and Barriers", "Expectations", and "Importance of Device Trials"; T2 - "One Size Doesn't Fit All, But All Are Worth Trying", "Environmental Affordances Enable Learning", and "Enabling Abilities and Participation".

Conclusion: This study provides insights into how parental perceptions about power mobility may shift over time, thereby assisting clinicians in implementing ON Time Mobility. The study further highlights how PM use can positively impact socialization and participation and how PM use may provide children with a mobile learning environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小司机,大决定:父母对脑瘫儿童动力移动装置试验的看法和经验。
目的:在一项为期16周的研究中,探讨父母在三个时间点(基线(T0)、干预后1期(T1)和干预后2期(T2))对孩子使用两种动力移动(PM)设备的看法和体验:Explorer Mini (EM)和改装的坐骑车(mROC)。材料和方法:本现象学定性研究的数据是作为多地点随机、平衡AB交叉临床试验的一部分收集的,其中所有儿童参与者使用PM装置a (EM)和PM装置B (mROC)各8周。训练有素的研究人员在T0、T1和T2进行了面对面的、录音的半结构化父母访谈。每个时间点的数据分别使用恒定比较法进行分析。结果:24对儿童-父母参与了更大的临床试验。每组中的父母参与者完成了三次定性访谈(每个时间点一次),总共进行了72次访谈(每个时间点24次)。在每个时间点,代表父母参与者在整个研究过程中的独特主题出现了。主题为:T0 -“预期”、“调整”和“认识优势”;T1 -“益处和障碍”、“期望”和“器械试验的重要性”;T2 -“一种方法不适合所有人,但所有方法都值得尝试”,“环境支持使学习成为可能”,以及“促进能力和参与”。结论:本研究提供了父母对权力流动的看法如何随着时间的推移而变化的见解,从而帮助临床医生实施准时流动。该研究进一步强调了PM的使用如何对社会化和参与产生积极影响,以及PM的使用如何为儿童提供移动学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
期刊最新文献
Higher education experts' perspectives on incorporating Universal Design (UD) and accessibility into Higher Education (HE) curricula. Effectiveness of the mobile learning HiSense Taxi App for improving taxi drivers' services for individuals with disabilities: a randomized controlled trial. Analysis of the effect of path cross slope on manual wheelchair propulsion. Impact of an omni-directional accessible design on caregiver's wheelchair operability. Agreement of the wheelchair triceps test in face-to-face and synchronous remote assessments in people with spinal cord injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1