Adult split liver transplantation to treat liver cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE World journal of emergency medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.098
Qiang Sun, Haoze Cao, Xuesong Bai, Xin Han, Wanlu You, Zhongquan Sun, Yixin Zhang, Xiaochang Wu, Feng Fang, Fan Wu, Lianyue Yang, Sheng Yan, Yuan Ding, Weilin Wang
{"title":"Adult split liver transplantation to treat liver cancer: a single-center retrospective study.","authors":"Qiang Sun, Haoze Cao, Xuesong Bai, Xin Han, Wanlu You, Zhongquan Sun, Yixin Zhang, Xiaochang Wu, Feng Fang, Fan Wu, Lianyue Yang, Sheng Yan, Yuan Ding, Weilin Wang","doi":"10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing morbidity of liver cancer has led to a growing demand for transplantation. Split liver transplantation (SLT) is a promising way to ameliorate organ shortages. However, the safety and efficacy of SLT are still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of SLT in liver cancer patients at our center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 74 patients who received liver transplantation at a tertiary hospital from March 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied, of whom 37 recipients underwent SLT and 37 recipients underwent whole-graft liver transplantation (WGLT). Clinical data were analyzed and compared between patients who underwent SLT and WGLT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SLT and WGLT were successfully performed, with no intraoperative transplant-related mortality. Postoperatively, no significant differences in total bilirubin (TB, <i>P</i>=0.266), alanine transaminase (ALT, <i>P</i>=0.403) and aspartate transaminase (AST, <i>P</i>=0.160) levels within 30 d were detected between the two groups. The transplant-related mortality rates were 8.1% in the SLT group and 5.4% in the WGLT group within 30 d of surgery (<i>P</i>=1.000), and 10.8% and 8.1%, respectively, at 90 d after surgery (<i>P</i>=1.000). There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) between the SLT and WGLT groups (<i>P</i>=0.910, <i>P</i>=0.190).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that SLT does not imply additional risks in treating liver cancer compared with WGLT.</p>","PeriodicalId":23685,"journal":{"name":"World journal of emergency medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788118/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.098","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing morbidity of liver cancer has led to a growing demand for transplantation. Split liver transplantation (SLT) is a promising way to ameliorate organ shortages. However, the safety and efficacy of SLT are still controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcome of SLT in liver cancer patients at our center.

Methods: A total of 74 patients who received liver transplantation at a tertiary hospital from March 2019 to July 2023 were retrospectively studied, of whom 37 recipients underwent SLT and 37 recipients underwent whole-graft liver transplantation (WGLT). Clinical data were analyzed and compared between patients who underwent SLT and WGLT.

Results: SLT and WGLT were successfully performed, with no intraoperative transplant-related mortality. Postoperatively, no significant differences in total bilirubin (TB, P=0.266), alanine transaminase (ALT, P=0.403) and aspartate transaminase (AST, P=0.160) levels within 30 d were detected between the two groups. The transplant-related mortality rates were 8.1% in the SLT group and 5.4% in the WGLT group within 30 d of surgery (P=1.000), and 10.8% and 8.1%, respectively, at 90 d after surgery (P=1.000). There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS) between the SLT and WGLT groups (P=0.910, P=0.190).

Conclusion: Our results show that SLT does not imply additional risks in treating liver cancer compared with WGLT.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
671
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical, clinical and bioengineering studies related to multidisciplinary specialties of emergency medicine, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation, acute injury, out-of-hospital emergency medical service, intensive care, injury and disease prevention, disaster management, healthy policy and ethics, toxicology, and sudden illness, including cardiology, internal medicine, anesthesiology, orthopedics, and trauma care, and more. The journal also features basic science, special reports, case reports, board review questions, and more. Editorials and communications to the editor explore controversial issues and encourage further discussion by physicians dealing with emergency medicine.
期刊最新文献
Adult split liver transplantation to treat liver cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Application of myxovirus resistance protein A in the etiological diagnosis of infections in adults. Association between echocardiography utilization and prognosis in patients with cardiac arrest. Bacteria and host: what does this mean for sepsis bottleneck? Chinese clinical practice consensus for device-supported treatment in adults with post-cardiac arrest syndrome (2024 Edition).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1