Peng Zhang, Jiaxin Xu, Baichuan Xu, Yiyin Zhang, Yang Xie
{"title":"Health loss and economic burden of asthma in China: a qualitative review based on existing literature.","authors":"Peng Zhang, Jiaxin Xu, Baichuan Xu, Yiyin Zhang, Yang Xie","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01515-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asthma is a significant public health issue that cannot be ignored in China and around the world, bringing a huge social burden.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the disease burden of asthma in China, including health loss and cost of illness, and identify its influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review and qualitative descriptive analysis were conducted, Literature was accessed through PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wangfang Data, and VIP databases, with a cutoff date of April 3, 2024. The analysis focused on two main aspects: health loss burden, measured by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), including years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs); and economic burden, assessed through direct and indirect costs. The risk of bias in economic studies was assessed using an 11-item methodological checklist for cost of illness, while cross-sectional studies were evaluated using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's recommendation rating tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 50 studies, with eight focused on health loss and 42 on economic burden. The health loss studies showed a 51% decrease in asthma's age-standardized DALYs rate over 30 years, from 209.24 to 102.81 per 100,000 person-years. The health loss burden is influenced by factors such as high BMI, smoking, and occupational exposure. Economic burden studies reported annual direct costs from $348 to $1187 per capita, indirect costs from $7 to $1195, and hospitalization costs from $177 to $1547, influenced by frequency and severity of acute exacerbation, comorbidities, and treatment adherence. Quality assessment revealed moderate overall quality, with gaps in sensitivity analyses and cost data transparency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The health loss burden of asthma in China has significantly decreased from 1990 to 2019, with males experiencing a higher burden. However, regional disparities in the economic burden persist, highlighting the need for improved management and adherence to standardized treatment protocols to address these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11796196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01515-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Asthma is a significant public health issue that cannot be ignored in China and around the world, bringing a huge social burden.
Objectives: To evaluate the disease burden of asthma in China, including health loss and cost of illness, and identify its influencing factors.
Methods: A systematic literature review and qualitative descriptive analysis were conducted, Literature was accessed through PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CNKI, Wangfang Data, and VIP databases, with a cutoff date of April 3, 2024. The analysis focused on two main aspects: health loss burden, measured by disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), including years of life lost (YLLs) and years lived with disability (YLDs); and economic burden, assessed through direct and indirect costs. The risk of bias in economic studies was assessed using an 11-item methodological checklist for cost of illness, while cross-sectional studies were evaluated using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's recommendation rating tool.
Results: The analysis included 50 studies, with eight focused on health loss and 42 on economic burden. The health loss studies showed a 51% decrease in asthma's age-standardized DALYs rate over 30 years, from 209.24 to 102.81 per 100,000 person-years. The health loss burden is influenced by factors such as high BMI, smoking, and occupational exposure. Economic burden studies reported annual direct costs from $348 to $1187 per capita, indirect costs from $7 to $1195, and hospitalization costs from $177 to $1547, influenced by frequency and severity of acute exacerbation, comorbidities, and treatment adherence. Quality assessment revealed moderate overall quality, with gaps in sensitivity analyses and cost data transparency.
Conclusion: The health loss burden of asthma in China has significantly decreased from 1990 to 2019, with males experiencing a higher burden. However, regional disparities in the economic burden persist, highlighting the need for improved management and adherence to standardized treatment protocols to address these disparities.
背景:哮喘是中国乃至世界范围内不容忽视的重大公共卫生问题,是一个巨大的社会负担。目的:评估中国哮喘疾病负担,包括健康损失和疾病成本,并确定其影响因素。方法:进行系统文献综述和定性描述分析,文献通过PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、CNKI、网方数据、VIP数据库获取,截止日期为2024年4月3日。分析侧重于两个主要方面:健康损失负担,以残疾调整生命年(DALYs)衡量,包括生命损失年数(YLLs)和残疾生活年数(YLDs);经济负担,通过直接和间接成本来评估。经济研究中的偏倚风险是用11项疾病成本方法学检查表来评估的,而横断面研究是用医疗保健研究和质量机构的推荐评级工具来评估的。结果:该分析包括50项研究,其中8项关注健康损失,42项关注经济负担。健康损失研究显示,哮喘的年龄标准化DALYs率在30年内下降了51%,从每10万人年209.24降至102.81。健康损失负担受高BMI、吸烟和职业暴露等因素的影响。经济负担研究报告,受急性恶化的频率和严重程度、合并症和治疗依从性的影响,每年人均直接费用为348美元至1187美元,间接费用为7美元至1195美元,住院费用为177美元至1547美元。质量评估显示整体质量中等,在敏感性分析和成本数据透明度方面存在差距。结论:1990 - 2019年,中国哮喘健康损失负担显著下降,且男性负担较高。然而,经济负担方面的区域差异仍然存在,突出表明需要改进管理和遵守标准化治疗方案,以解决这些差异。
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.