Infant-Led Incubator Weaning: A Promising Paradigm Shift in Preterm Neonatal Care.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235
Jennifer Rath, Lauren A Stracuzzi, Sarah E Wawrzynski, Catherine Haut
{"title":"Infant-Led Incubator Weaning: A Promising Paradigm Shift in Preterm Neonatal Care.","authors":"Jennifer Rath, Lauren A Stracuzzi, Sarah E Wawrzynski, Catherine Haut","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermoregulation is paramount in preterm infant care, traditionally addressed through nurse-led incubator weaning protocols. Recent research has introduced infant-driven incubator protocols that are demonstrating promise.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study, conducted at a freestanding academic pediatric hospital in the mid-Atlantic, examined the impact of infant-led incubator weaning on a specific neonatal cohort. The primary hypothesis posited that infants in the infant-led weaning group would wean out of the incubator at earlier gestational ages and lower weights, while maintaining comparable or greater weight gain during the transition to open cribs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review compared 40 infants weighing less than 1500 g before and after a weaning protocol change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infant-led weaning demonstrated lower weights at weaning to crib (M = 1836.80 g) compared with nurse-led weaning (M = 1975.9 g), with statistical significance (t [36] = 2.27, P = .02, Cohen's d = 0.74). Infants in the infant-led group had a lower weight change 5 days prior to weaning (M = 141 g) compared with the nurse-led group (M = 185 g), which is also statistically significant (t [36] = 1.93, P = .03, Cohen's d = 0.63). T-tests revealed no significant differences in gestational age at wean to crib, change in weight post-weaning, gestational age, or days to discharge.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>Infant-led weaning emerges as a safe alternative with potential benefits for preterm neonates and their families. While initial positive outcomes are evident, further research with a larger neonatal cohort is imperative to validate the efficacy of infant-led weaning as a successful alternative to traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001235","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thermoregulation is paramount in preterm infant care, traditionally addressed through nurse-led incubator weaning protocols. Recent research has introduced infant-driven incubator protocols that are demonstrating promise.

Purpose: This study, conducted at a freestanding academic pediatric hospital in the mid-Atlantic, examined the impact of infant-led incubator weaning on a specific neonatal cohort. The primary hypothesis posited that infants in the infant-led weaning group would wean out of the incubator at earlier gestational ages and lower weights, while maintaining comparable or greater weight gain during the transition to open cribs.

Methods: A retrospective chart review compared 40 infants weighing less than 1500 g before and after a weaning protocol change.

Results: Infant-led weaning demonstrated lower weights at weaning to crib (M = 1836.80 g) compared with nurse-led weaning (M = 1975.9 g), with statistical significance (t [36] = 2.27, P = .02, Cohen's d = 0.74). Infants in the infant-led group had a lower weight change 5 days prior to weaning (M = 141 g) compared with the nurse-led group (M = 185 g), which is also statistically significant (t [36] = 1.93, P = .03, Cohen's d = 0.63). T-tests revealed no significant differences in gestational age at wean to crib, change in weight post-weaning, gestational age, or days to discharge.

Implications for practice and research: Infant-led weaning emerges as a safe alternative with potential benefits for preterm neonates and their families. While initial positive outcomes are evident, further research with a larger neonatal cohort is imperative to validate the efficacy of infant-led weaning as a successful alternative to traditional methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
期刊最新文献
Culture of Family-Centered Care in the NICU. Parents' Experiences With Couplet Care Following Caesarean Section in an Integrated Neonatal and Maternity Unit. Infant-Led Incubator Weaning: A Promising Paradigm Shift in Preterm Neonatal Care. Eyedealistic Vision: Optimizing Oxygenation to Reduce Severe Retinopathy of Prematurity in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. The Impact of Pandemic-Induced Separation and Visitation Restrictions on the Maternal-Infant Dyad in Neonatal Units: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1