Clinical outcomes following treatment for small saphenous vein insufficiency: An AVLS PRO venous registry study.

Carlos Echevarria, Sherry Scovell, John Blebea, Micah Thornton, Julianne Stoughton
{"title":"Clinical outcomes following treatment for small saphenous vein insufficiency: An AVLS PRO venous registry study.","authors":"Carlos Echevarria, Sherry Scovell, John Blebea, Micah Thornton, Julianne Stoughton","doi":"10.1177/02683555251317854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Compared to the great saphenous vein, there is a relative paucity of data in the literature focused on treating the small saphenous vein (SSV). Our goal was to evaluate and analyze national registry data related to the diagnosis and treatment of the SSV and identify practice patterns and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Subjects undergoing SSV interventions between April 2014 and March 2023 were identified in the AVLS PRO Venous Registry. Data points included Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathological (CEAP) classifications; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), Venous Quality of Life (VVSymQ®) instrument scores, Heaviness, Aching, Swelling, Throbbing, Itching (HASTI) symptoms, and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36.) Duplex ultrasound findings included vein diameter, length, and the overall recanalization rate.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 92,175 SSV interventions were identified. Over two-thirds of subjects presented with a CEAP classification of C3 (31%) and C4 (C4 40%). Clinical results demonstrated significant improvement immediately after treatment in the first month and maintained beneficial results at 1 year or longer (<i>p</i> < 0.001.) This improvement was reflected in the significant decrease in VCSS scores (6 ± 3.4 to 5 ± 2.9; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), VVSymQ (9.5 ± 6.0 to 5.9 ± 4.4; <i>p</i> < 0.0001), and HASTI (9.4 ± 5.9 to 6.6 ± 5.2; <i>p</i> < 0.0001). The recanalization rate at any follow-up was 3%; 48% of those occurring within the first year. Predictors associated with recanalization were larger vein diameter (mean 4.0 mm, 95% CI 3.9-4.1, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and shorter SSV length (mean 15.27 mm, 95 % CI 14.4-16.1, <i>p</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment of SSV insufficiency improved clinical outcomes by both patient and physician-derived outcome measures. Only 3% of SSV demonstrated recanalization, and nearly half occurred within the first year following the procedure. Predictors of recanalization included larger pre-procedure vein diameters and treatment of a shorter length of SSV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251317854"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251317854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compared to the great saphenous vein, there is a relative paucity of data in the literature focused on treating the small saphenous vein (SSV). Our goal was to evaluate and analyze national registry data related to the diagnosis and treatment of the SSV and identify practice patterns and clinical outcomes.

Method: Subjects undergoing SSV interventions between April 2014 and March 2023 were identified in the AVLS PRO Venous Registry. Data points included Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathological (CEAP) classifications; Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), Venous Quality of Life (VVSymQ®) instrument scores, Heaviness, Aching, Swelling, Throbbing, Itching (HASTI) symptoms, and Short Form Health Survey (SF-36.) Duplex ultrasound findings included vein diameter, length, and the overall recanalization rate.

Result: A total of 92,175 SSV interventions were identified. Over two-thirds of subjects presented with a CEAP classification of C3 (31%) and C4 (C4 40%). Clinical results demonstrated significant improvement immediately after treatment in the first month and maintained beneficial results at 1 year or longer (p < 0.001.) This improvement was reflected in the significant decrease in VCSS scores (6 ± 3.4 to 5 ± 2.9; p < 0.0001), VVSymQ (9.5 ± 6.0 to 5.9 ± 4.4; p < 0.0001), and HASTI (9.4 ± 5.9 to 6.6 ± 5.2; p < 0.0001). The recanalization rate at any follow-up was 3%; 48% of those occurring within the first year. Predictors associated with recanalization were larger vein diameter (mean 4.0 mm, 95% CI 3.9-4.1, p < 0.0001) and shorter SSV length (mean 15.27 mm, 95 % CI 14.4-16.1, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Treatment of SSV insufficiency improved clinical outcomes by both patient and physician-derived outcome measures. Only 3% of SSV demonstrated recanalization, and nearly half occurred within the first year following the procedure. Predictors of recanalization included larger pre-procedure vein diameters and treatment of a shorter length of SSV.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical outcomes following treatment for small saphenous vein insufficiency: An AVLS PRO venous registry study. Compression terms: Defining terminology of compression therapy - An international compression club consensus document. Treatment of lower limb telangiectasias with Nd: Yag 1064 nm laser with and without tumescent anesthesia - TTL technique. Comparison of staged versus one shot varicose veins treatment: Depending on tributaries diameter. Physical activity levels in patients with chronic venous insufficiency.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1