Pixel Intensity to Estimate Choroidal Tumor Thickness Using 2-Dimensional Ultra-Widefield Images

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY JAMA ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6064
Michael D. Yu, Michael Heiferman, Edward Korot, Aneesha Ahluwalia, Gina Yu, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya
{"title":"Pixel Intensity to Estimate Choroidal Tumor Thickness Using 2-Dimensional Ultra-Widefield Images","authors":"Michael D. Yu, Michael Heiferman, Edward Korot, Aneesha Ahluwalia, Gina Yu, Prithvi Mruthyunjaya","doi":"10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ImportanceTumor thickness is a well-established risk factor for malignant transformation of choroidal nevus into melanoma. To date, reliable evaluation of tumor thickness relies on B-scan ultrasonography, which is frequently unavailable at nonsubspecialty clinics where most melanocytic choroidal lesions (MCLs) are first diagnosed.ObjectiveTo describe a technique for potential rapid and reliable estimation of MCL thickness using only Optomap ultra-widefield (UWF) images without B-scan ultrasonography.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of consecutive MCLs diagnosed at Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, investigates the quantitative correlation between B-scan ultrasonographic thickness of MCLs with the relative pixel intensity of MCLs on green-channel (GC) Optomap UWF images. Pixel intensity overlying the lesion was standardized to the pixel intensity surrounding the lesion (pixel intensity difference [PID]), which was then correlated with ultrasonographic tumor thickness in all study lesions using linear regression analysis. Data were collected from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe correlation between ultrasonographic tumor thickness and PID was measured. Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the regression analysis trendline in estimating tumor thickness was also determined.ResultsA total of 138 MCLs from 138 patients (mean age, 57.0 years; 51% female) were included, comprising 125 that were nevi and 13 that were melanoma. The mean ultrasonographic tumor thickness was 1.1 mm (median, 0.8 mm; range, 0.2-5.5 mm), with a mean PID of 2.13. Stratifying lesions by ultrasonographic thickness (&amp;amp;lt;1.0 mm vs 1.0-2.0 mm vs &amp;amp;gt;2.0 mm), the mean PID increased (−1.95 vs 3.72 vs 17.62; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) as mean thickness increased (0.5 mm vs 1.4 mm vs 3.3 mm; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001). PID was correlated with tumor thickness (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.823; 95% CI, 0.770-0.875; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &amp;amp;lt; .001) across lesions of all sizes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this proof-of-principle study, GC-derived lesion intensity correlated well with ultrasonographic tumor thickness. Leveraging this correlation, this study demonstrates a technique for potentially reliable and rapid estimation of tumor thickness using UWF Optomap images without the use of B-scan ultrasonography.","PeriodicalId":14518,"journal":{"name":"JAMA ophthalmology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceTumor thickness is a well-established risk factor for malignant transformation of choroidal nevus into melanoma. To date, reliable evaluation of tumor thickness relies on B-scan ultrasonography, which is frequently unavailable at nonsubspecialty clinics where most melanocytic choroidal lesions (MCLs) are first diagnosed.ObjectiveTo describe a technique for potential rapid and reliable estimation of MCL thickness using only Optomap ultra-widefield (UWF) images without B-scan ultrasonography.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional analysis of consecutive MCLs diagnosed at Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, investigates the quantitative correlation between B-scan ultrasonographic thickness of MCLs with the relative pixel intensity of MCLs on green-channel (GC) Optomap UWF images. Pixel intensity overlying the lesion was standardized to the pixel intensity surrounding the lesion (pixel intensity difference [PID]), which was then correlated with ultrasonographic tumor thickness in all study lesions using linear regression analysis. Data were collected from January 1, 2019, to July 1, 2021.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe correlation between ultrasonographic tumor thickness and PID was measured. Performance (sensitivity and specificity) of the regression analysis trendline in estimating tumor thickness was also determined.ResultsA total of 138 MCLs from 138 patients (mean age, 57.0 years; 51% female) were included, comprising 125 that were nevi and 13 that were melanoma. The mean ultrasonographic tumor thickness was 1.1 mm (median, 0.8 mm; range, 0.2-5.5 mm), with a mean PID of 2.13. Stratifying lesions by ultrasonographic thickness (&amp;lt;1.0 mm vs 1.0-2.0 mm vs &amp;gt;2.0 mm), the mean PID increased (−1.95 vs 3.72 vs 17.62; P &amp;lt; .001) as mean thickness increased (0.5 mm vs 1.4 mm vs 3.3 mm; P &amp;lt; .001). PID was correlated with tumor thickness (R2 = 0.823; 95% CI, 0.770-0.875; P &amp;lt; .001) across lesions of all sizes.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this proof-of-principle study, GC-derived lesion intensity correlated well with ultrasonographic tumor thickness. Leveraging this correlation, this study demonstrates a technique for potentially reliable and rapid estimation of tumor thickness using UWF Optomap images without the use of B-scan ultrasonography.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA ophthalmology
JAMA ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
340
期刊介绍: JAMA Ophthalmology, with a rich history of continuous publication since 1869, stands as a distinguished international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to ophthalmology and visual science. In 2019, the journal proudly commemorated 150 years of uninterrupted service to the field. As a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, a consortium renowned for its peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Ophthalmology upholds the highest standards of excellence in disseminating cutting-edge research and insights. Join us in celebrating our legacy and advancing the frontiers of ophthalmology and visual science.
期刊最新文献
Pixel Intensity to Estimate Choroidal Tumor Thickness Using 2-Dimensional Ultra-Widefield Images COVID-19 Pandemic and Rates of Common Ophthalmic Procedures Among Medicare Beneficiaries Primary Conjunctival Rhabdomyosarcoma Presenting as an Enlarging Papillomatous Lesion in a 3-Year-Old Adverse Events in a Mobile Eye Health Outreach Program Ophthalmic Complications Associated With the Antidiabetic Drugs Semaglutide and Tirzepatide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1