Engagement of Older Adults in the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems for Aging: A Scoping Review

Hannah Cho, Oonjee Oh, Nancy Greene, Larissa Gordon, Sherry Morgan, Lisa Walke, George Demiris
{"title":"Engagement of Older Adults in the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems for Aging: A Scoping Review","authors":"Hannah Cho, Oonjee Oh, Nancy Greene, Larissa Gordon, Sherry Morgan, Lisa Walke, George Demiris","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health and healthcare, especially for older adults, has significantly advanced healthcare delivery. AI technologies, with capabilities such as self-learning and pattern recognition, are employed to address social isolation and monitor older adults' daily activities. However, rapid AI development often fails to consider the heterogeneous needs of older populations, which could exacerbate an existing digital divide and inequality. This scoping review examines older adults’ involvement in AI system design, implementation, and evaluation of AI systems in health and healthcare literature, emphasizing the necessity of their input for beneficial AI systems. We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-SCR. We reviewed 17 studies, finding that half of these studies (n = 8) engaged older adults during the design phase, a small number (n = 3) during the evaluation stage, and even fewer (n = 2) involved older adults in the implementation stage. Despite AI’s growing role, design processes often overlook older adults’ needs. Our findings emphasize the need for inclusive, participatory design approaches to address ethical and equity challenges, enhancing user engagement and relevance. We also highlight how these approaches address the needs of older adults and improve outcomes. Specifically, we integrated evidence showing the practical benefits of these approaches for better accessibility, usability, and engagement among older adults. While AI has potential to improve healthcare delivery, these approaches must be part of broader efforts to ensure ethical, inclusive, and equitable AI practices, especially in gerontology.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"136 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in health and healthcare, especially for older adults, has significantly advanced healthcare delivery. AI technologies, with capabilities such as self-learning and pattern recognition, are employed to address social isolation and monitor older adults' daily activities. However, rapid AI development often fails to consider the heterogeneous needs of older populations, which could exacerbate an existing digital divide and inequality. This scoping review examines older adults’ involvement in AI system design, implementation, and evaluation of AI systems in health and healthcare literature, emphasizing the necessity of their input for beneficial AI systems. We conducted a scoping review according to PRISMA-SCR. We reviewed 17 studies, finding that half of these studies (n = 8) engaged older adults during the design phase, a small number (n = 3) during the evaluation stage, and even fewer (n = 2) involved older adults in the implementation stage. Despite AI’s growing role, design processes often overlook older adults’ needs. Our findings emphasize the need for inclusive, participatory design approaches to address ethical and equity challenges, enhancing user engagement and relevance. We also highlight how these approaches address the needs of older adults and improve outcomes. Specifically, we integrated evidence showing the practical benefits of these approaches for better accessibility, usability, and engagement among older adults. While AI has potential to improve healthcare delivery, these approaches must be part of broader efforts to ensure ethical, inclusive, and equitable AI practices, especially in gerontology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Obesity, sarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity and hypertension: mediating role of inflammation and insulin resistance Association of motoric cognitive risk syndrome and high C-reactive protein serum levels with incident major neurocognitive disorder: Results from the Quebec NuAge cohort Engagement of Older Adults in the Design, Implementation and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems for Aging: A Scoping Review The association of physical function and physical performance with DNA methylation clocks in oldest-old living in Singapore - the SG90 cohort The Influence of Sex, Fitness, BMI, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors on Cerebral Blood Velocity Responsiveness to Graded Exercise Testing in Middle-Aged Adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1