Tell me a story! Narrative-driven XAI with Large Language Models

IF 6.7 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Decision Support Systems Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2025.114402
David Martens , James Hinns , Camille Dams , Mark Vergouwen , Theodoros Evgeniou
{"title":"Tell me a story! Narrative-driven XAI with Large Language Models","authors":"David Martens ,&nbsp;James Hinns ,&nbsp;Camille Dams ,&nbsp;Mark Vergouwen ,&nbsp;Theodoros Evgeniou","doi":"10.1016/j.dss.2025.114402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing Explainable AI (XAI) approaches, such as the widely used SHAP values or counterfactual (CF) explanations, are arguably often too technical for users to understand and act upon. To enhance comprehension of explanations of AI decisions and the overall user experience, we introduce XAIstories, which leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide narratives about how AI predictions are made: SHAPstories based on SHAP and CFstories on CF explanations. We study the impact of our approach on users’ experience and understanding of AI predictions. Our results are striking: over 90% of the surveyed general audience finds the narratives generated by SHAPstories convincing, and over 78% for CFstories, in a tabular data experiment. More than 75% of the respondents in an image experiment find CFstories more or equally convincing as their own crafted stories. We also find that the generated stories help users to more accurately summarize and understand AI decisions than they do when only SHAP values are provided. The results indicate that combining LLM generated stories with current XAI methods is a promising and impactful research direction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55181,"journal":{"name":"Decision Support Systems","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 114402"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Support Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016792362500003X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing Explainable AI (XAI) approaches, such as the widely used SHAP values or counterfactual (CF) explanations, are arguably often too technical for users to understand and act upon. To enhance comprehension of explanations of AI decisions and the overall user experience, we introduce XAIstories, which leverage Large Language Models (LLMs) to provide narratives about how AI predictions are made: SHAPstories based on SHAP and CFstories on CF explanations. We study the impact of our approach on users’ experience and understanding of AI predictions. Our results are striking: over 90% of the surveyed general audience finds the narratives generated by SHAPstories convincing, and over 78% for CFstories, in a tabular data experiment. More than 75% of the respondents in an image experiment find CFstories more or equally convincing as their own crafted stories. We also find that the generated stories help users to more accurately summarize and understand AI decisions than they do when only SHAP values are provided. The results indicate that combining LLM generated stories with current XAI methods is a promising and impactful research direction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现有的可解释人工智能(XAI)方法,如广泛使用的SHAP值或反事实(CF)解释,可以说往往技术性太强,用户难以理解和操作。为了提高对人工智能决策解释的理解力和整体用户体验,我们引入了 XAIstories,它利用大型语言模型(LLM)来叙述人工智能预测是如何做出的:其中,SHAPstories 基于 SHAP,CFstories 基于 CF 解释。我们研究了我们的方法对用户体验和理解人工智能预测的影响。我们的研究结果令人震惊:在一项表格数据实验中,超过 90% 的受访普通用户认为 SHAPstories 所生成的叙述具有说服力,超过 78% 的受访普通用户认为 CFstories 所生成的叙述具有说服力。在图像实验中,超过 75% 的受访者认为 CFstories 与他们自己创作的故事更有说服力或同样有说服力。我们还发现,与只提供 SHAP 值时相比,生成的故事能帮助用户更准确地总结和理解人工智能决策。这些结果表明,将 LLM 生成的故事与当前的 XAI 方法相结合是一个很有前景和影响力的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decision Support Systems
Decision Support Systems 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
14.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
13 months
期刊介绍: The common thread of articles published in Decision Support Systems is their relevance to theoretical and technical issues in the support of enhanced decision making. The areas addressed may include foundations, functionality, interfaces, implementation, impacts, and evaluation of decision support systems (DSSs).
期刊最新文献
Exploring the impact of free live-streamed medical consultation on patient engagement and patient satisfaction in the multistage online consultation process: A quasi-experimental design DECEN: A deep learning model enhanced by depressive emotions for depression detection from social media content Editorial Board Is seeing the same as doing? An evaluation of vicarious experiences in the metaverse A deep learning–based method to predict the length of stay for patients with traumatic fall injuries in support of physicians' clinical decisions and patient management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1