Patients’ satisfaction and efficacy of modern conventional hearing aids: A comprehensive analysis of the self-reported user experiences in adult people

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101565
Daniele Portelli , Cosimo Galletti , Sabrina Loteta , Leonard Freni , Francesco Ciodaro , Angela Alibrandi , Giuseppe Alberti
{"title":"Patients’ satisfaction and efficacy of modern conventional hearing aids: A comprehensive analysis of the self-reported user experiences in adult people","authors":"Daniele Portelli ,&nbsp;Cosimo Galletti ,&nbsp;Sabrina Loteta ,&nbsp;Leonard Freni ,&nbsp;Francesco Ciodaro ,&nbsp;Angela Alibrandi ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Alberti","doi":"10.1016/j.bjorl.2025.101565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Hearing loss is a widespread condition that impacts the quality of life, affecting communication, social interactions, and cognitive functions. This study aimed to evaluate the subjective benefit and satisfaction of using hearing aids among patients since the adoption rate of hearing aids remains low.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study retrospectively analysed data from 133 patients with hearing aids, using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaires. Patients were divided into two groups based on this median age and sex for comparative analysis. The Mann Whitney test was applied with references to numerical parameters (APHAB and SADL) to assess differences between male vs female subjects and adults vs elderly. The Spearman correlation test was applied to assess the possible correlation between APHAB and SADL. A <em>p-</em>value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Results indicated no significant gender differences in most APHAB and SADL subscales, except for the SADL “personal image” subscale, which showed lower scores for women (<em>p</em> =  0.023). Age-based comparison revealed no significant differences in APHAB scores; the SADL scores showed significant differences in the “positive effect” (<em>p</em> = 0.013), “negative features” (<em>p</em> = 0.005), and overall scores (<em>p</em> = 0.039), with lower satisfaction in older patients. Correlation analysis identified a positive relationship between the SADL “negative features” and APHAB “aversiveness” subscales (<em>p</em> = 0.042, correlation coefficient ρ = 0.176).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study highlights the importance of addressing subjective perceptions and aesthetic concerns in hearing aid adoption, emphasizing the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level 3.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49099,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"91 3","pages":"Article 101565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1808869425000084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Hearing loss is a widespread condition that impacts the quality of life, affecting communication, social interactions, and cognitive functions. This study aimed to evaluate the subjective benefit and satisfaction of using hearing aids among patients since the adoption rate of hearing aids remains low.

Methods

The study retrospectively analysed data from 133 patients with hearing aids, using the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) and the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) questionnaires. Patients were divided into two groups based on this median age and sex for comparative analysis. The Mann Whitney test was applied with references to numerical parameters (APHAB and SADL) to assess differences between male vs female subjects and adults vs elderly. The Spearman correlation test was applied to assess the possible correlation between APHAB and SADL. A p-value lower than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Results indicated no significant gender differences in most APHAB and SADL subscales, except for the SADL “personal image” subscale, which showed lower scores for women (p =  0.023). Age-based comparison revealed no significant differences in APHAB scores; the SADL scores showed significant differences in the “positive effect” (p = 0.013), “negative features” (p = 0.005), and overall scores (p = 0.039), with lower satisfaction in older patients. Correlation analysis identified a positive relationship between the SADL “negative features” and APHAB “aversiveness” subscales (p = 0.042, correlation coefficient ρ = 0.176).

Conclusions

The study highlights the importance of addressing subjective perceptions and aesthetic concerns in hearing aid adoption, emphasizing the need for personalized rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.

Level of evidence

Level 3.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代传统助听器的患者满意度与疗效:成人自述使用体验的综合分析
听力损失是一种影响生活质量、影响沟通、社会交往和认知功能的普遍疾病。本研究旨在评估患者使用助听器的主观利益和满意度,因为助听器的采用率仍然很低。方法回顾性分析133例助听器患者的资料,采用助听器获益简表(APHAB)和日常生活放大满意度问卷(SADL)。根据中位年龄和性别将患者分为两组进行比较分析。采用Mann Whitney检验,参照数值参数(APHAB和SADL)评估男性与女性、成人与老年人之间的差异。应用Spearman相关检验评估APHAB与SADL之间可能存在的相关性。p值小于0.05认为有统计学意义。结果在大多数APHAB和SADL子量表中,除SADL“个人形象”子量表中女性得分较低外,性别差异不显著(p = 0.023)。基于年龄的比较显示APHAB评分无显著差异;SADL评分在“积极效果”(p = 0.013)、“消极特征”(p = 0.005)和总体评分(p = 0.039)上存在显著差异,老年患者满意度较低。相关分析发现SADL“负性特征”与APHAB“厌恶性”分量表呈正相关(p = 0.042,相关系数ρ = 0.176)。结论:本研究强调了在助听器使用过程中解决主观感知和审美问题的重要性,强调了个性化康复策略的必要性,以提高患者的预后和满意度。证据等级:3级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology publishes original contributions in otolaryngology and the associated areas (cranio-maxillo-facial surgery and phoniatrics). The aim of this journal is the national and international divulgation of the scientific production interesting to the otolaryngology, as well as the discussion, in editorials, of subjects of scientific, academic and professional relevance. The Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology is born from the Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, of which it is the English version, created and indexed by MEDLINE in 2005. It is the official scientific publication of the Brazilian Association of Otolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery. Its abbreviated title is Braz J Otorhinolaryngol., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
Prognostic factors analysis of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma A tracheal ‘tumor’ revealed as granulation-encapsulated sunflower seed shell in a 23-month-old child Causal relationship between genetically predicted Enzyme and Tinnitus risk: a two-sample bi-directional mendelian randomization study CXCR4+ cells in NPC tumor sphere have metastatic potential Sensitivity and specificity of the video head impulse test in the diagnosis of vestibular migraine – A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1