Characterization of directionality influence on non-Darcian flow in single rock fractures

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Engineering Geology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107947
Zihao Sun , Liangchao Zou , Jia-Qing Zhou , Liangqing Wang , Yue Zhu , Xunwan Yao , Rui Ke
{"title":"Characterization of directionality influence on non-Darcian flow in single rock fractures","authors":"Zihao Sun ,&nbsp;Liangchao Zou ,&nbsp;Jia-Qing Zhou ,&nbsp;Liangqing Wang ,&nbsp;Yue Zhu ,&nbsp;Xunwan Yao ,&nbsp;Rui Ke","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2025.107947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Significant differences in non-Darcian flow between different directions (i.e., forward and reverse flow directions) exist in rock fractures, and understanding of these differences holds crucial implications for evaluating and characterizing flow within fractured rocks. This study proposes a directional aperture parameter to quantitatively characterize the differences in flow between different directions. Firstly, a directional aperture parameter capable of quantitatively distinguishing geometric information of fractures in different directions is proposed. Then, 900 sets of linear and nonlinear flow numerical experiments based on 90 rough fractures are conducted. The results reveal that the differences between forward and reverse flow are shown in the nonlinear flow regime, with equal viscous permeability but significant differences in inertial permeability between the two flow directions. The main reason for the differences lies in the variations of aperture along the two flow directions. A dual-parameter model characterizing the inertial permeability is established by using the directional aperture parameter based on the numerical experimental data from the 90 rough fractures. The critical condition where the significant differences between the forward and reverse flow starting to appear are identified. The quantitative characterization of differences in three-dimensional rough fractures between different directional flows is discussed. The findings from this study could be helpful in advancing our understanding of fluid flow behaviors in natural rock fractures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"347 ","pages":"Article 107947"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795225000432","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significant differences in non-Darcian flow between different directions (i.e., forward and reverse flow directions) exist in rock fractures, and understanding of these differences holds crucial implications for evaluating and characterizing flow within fractured rocks. This study proposes a directional aperture parameter to quantitatively characterize the differences in flow between different directions. Firstly, a directional aperture parameter capable of quantitatively distinguishing geometric information of fractures in different directions is proposed. Then, 900 sets of linear and nonlinear flow numerical experiments based on 90 rough fractures are conducted. The results reveal that the differences between forward and reverse flow are shown in the nonlinear flow regime, with equal viscous permeability but significant differences in inertial permeability between the two flow directions. The main reason for the differences lies in the variations of aperture along the two flow directions. A dual-parameter model characterizing the inertial permeability is established by using the directional aperture parameter based on the numerical experimental data from the 90 rough fractures. The critical condition where the significant differences between the forward and reverse flow starting to appear are identified. The quantitative characterization of differences in three-dimensional rough fractures between different directional flows is discussed. The findings from this study could be helpful in advancing our understanding of fluid flow behaviors in natural rock fractures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of morphological features and mechanical behavior of jointed limestone subjected to wet-dry cycles and cyclic shear in drawdown areas of the Three Gorges Reservoir Efficient probabilistic tunning of large geological model (LGM) for underground digital twin Flash flood impacts and vulnerability mapping at catchment scale: Insights from southern Apennines The mechanisms of salt weathering responsible for sandstone deterioration in the Yungang Grottoes, China Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1