Impact of baby-friendly hospital initiatives on breastfeeding outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101881
Ying Wei Fan , Heidi Sze Lok Fan , Jeffery Sheung Yu Shing , Hoi Lam Ip , Daniel Yee Tak Fong , Kris Yuet Wan Lok
{"title":"Impact of baby-friendly hospital initiatives on breastfeeding outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Ying Wei Fan ,&nbsp;Heidi Sze Lok Fan ,&nbsp;Jeffery Sheung Yu Shing ,&nbsp;Hoi Lam Ip ,&nbsp;Daniel Yee Tak Fong ,&nbsp;Kris Yuet Wan Lok","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is a global effort promoting the Ten Steps to support breastfeeding in maternity-care facilities.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>This study examined the effect of BFHI on breastfeeding outcomes, focusing on initiation rates, exclusive breastfeeding durations, and factors influencing its effectiveness.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching nine databases (1991 to February 2024). Included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational studies, with sites implementing the full BFHI or at least three steps. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Random-effects models were used for pooled results, with subgroup analyses based on BFHI status and country income level.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Eighty-six studies were included. Infants in BFHI hospitals were more likely to be exclusively breastfed at ≤ 3 months (OR= 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.37–2.29) and 3–6 months (OR= 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.26–2.61). Higher rates of any breastfeeding were observed at ≤ 3 months (OR= 1.48; 95 % CI: 1.17–1.87), 3–6 months (OR= 1.75; 95 % CI: 1.18–2.61) and at &gt; 6 months (OR= 2.34; 95 % CI: 1.04–5.27).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>BFHI implementation positively impacts breastfeeding outcomes, with both short- and long-term effects. Partial implementation also correlates with higher exclusive breastfeeding rates. Insignificant differences across income levels may reflect the limited number of studies in low-and middle- income countries. Further research with longer-term follow up is needed to confirm long-term effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 101881"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871519225000150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is a global effort promoting the Ten Steps to support breastfeeding in maternity-care facilities.

Aim

This study examined the effect of BFHI on breastfeeding outcomes, focusing on initiation rates, exclusive breastfeeding durations, and factors influencing its effectiveness.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching nine databases (1991 to February 2024). Included studies were experimental, quasi-experimental, or observational studies, with sites implementing the full BFHI or at least three steps. Two reviewers independently screened studies, assessed risk of bias, and extracted data. Random-effects models were used for pooled results, with subgroup analyses based on BFHI status and country income level.

Discussion

Eighty-six studies were included. Infants in BFHI hospitals were more likely to be exclusively breastfed at ≤ 3 months (OR= 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.37–2.29) and 3–6 months (OR= 1.82; 95 % CI: 1.26–2.61). Higher rates of any breastfeeding were observed at ≤ 3 months (OR= 1.48; 95 % CI: 1.17–1.87), 3–6 months (OR= 1.75; 95 % CI: 1.18–2.61) and at > 6 months (OR= 2.34; 95 % CI: 1.04–5.27).

Conclusions

BFHI implementation positively impacts breastfeeding outcomes, with both short- and long-term effects. Partial implementation also correlates with higher exclusive breastfeeding rates. Insignificant differences across income levels may reflect the limited number of studies in low-and middle- income countries. Further research with longer-term follow up is needed to confirm long-term effects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
Impact of baby-friendly hospital initiatives on breastfeeding outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis Enhancing Midwifery and lactation support for women in natural disasters and humanitarian crises A qualitative analysis of Australian midwifery students’ perspectives of Midwifery Practice Experience: Characteristics that enhance or diminish clinical education placements The continuity relationship makes caring for women with anxiety and depression easier, but it is also a heavy responsibility “They painted a rosy view, but I would have preferred to hear the reality”‐ Australian women’s experiences of antenatal breastfeeding education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1