“How are you going to remove that cobweb?” Midwifery Services Framework implementation in Zambia: A case study

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Women and Birth Pub Date : 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101889
Kirsty Hughes , Bwalya Mabo , Shree Mandke , Andrea Nove
{"title":"“How are you going to remove that cobweb?” Midwifery Services Framework implementation in Zambia: A case study","authors":"Kirsty Hughes ,&nbsp;Bwalya Mabo ,&nbsp;Shree Mandke ,&nbsp;Andrea Nove","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Midwifery Services Framework (MSF) was devised by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) as an evidence-based tool to guide the process of improving sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health services through strengthening and developing the midwifery workforce. The MSF was updated in 2020 and implemented in Zambia in 2020–2023. This study examined the process of MSF implementation in Zambia from the perspectives of individuals and organisations involved in implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used an Appreciative Inquiry approach to collect qualitative data from nine stakeholders via semi-structured interviews, including representatives of all organizations involved in implementation. Guided by a process evaluation framework, a content analysis was undertaken on the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of MSF implementation achieved or contributed to positive results at a policy and health system level. This study identified factors that contributed to these successes, including: political will, alignment with national planning cycles and existing health system structures, broad stakeholder engagement, and intentional efforts to ensure contextualisation and local ownership of the process. Still more could have been achieved with: even broader stakeholder engagement, better understanding of key midwifery and health system concepts, and stronger data systems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Future efforts to implement the MSF and other investments in strengthening the midwifery workforce should take note of these key success factors and intentionally ‘design them in’ from the outset.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187151922500023X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The Midwifery Services Framework (MSF) was devised by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) as an evidence-based tool to guide the process of improving sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health services through strengthening and developing the midwifery workforce. The MSF was updated in 2020 and implemented in Zambia in 2020–2023. This study examined the process of MSF implementation in Zambia from the perspectives of individuals and organisations involved in implementation.

Methods

We used an Appreciative Inquiry approach to collect qualitative data from nine stakeholders via semi-structured interviews, including representatives of all organizations involved in implementation. Guided by a process evaluation framework, a content analysis was undertaken on the data.

Results

The process of MSF implementation achieved or contributed to positive results at a policy and health system level. This study identified factors that contributed to these successes, including: political will, alignment with national planning cycles and existing health system structures, broad stakeholder engagement, and intentional efforts to ensure contextualisation and local ownership of the process. Still more could have been achieved with: even broader stakeholder engagement, better understanding of key midwifery and health system concepts, and stronger data systems.

Conclusion

Future efforts to implement the MSF and other investments in strengthening the midwifery workforce should take note of these key success factors and intentionally ‘design them in’ from the outset.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“你打算怎么把蜘蛛网去掉呢?”赞比亚助产服务框架的实施:案例研究
助产服务框架(MSF)由国际助产士联合会(ICM)设计,作为一种循证工具,通过加强和发展助产人员队伍,指导改善性、生殖、孕产妇和新生儿健康服务的进程。无国界医生组织于2020年更新,并于2020 - 2023年在赞比亚实施。本研究从参与实施的个人和组织的角度审视了无国界医生在赞比亚的实施过程。方法我们采用赞赏式问询法,通过半结构化访谈从九个利益相关者那里收集定性数据,其中包括参与实施的所有组织的代表。在流程评估框架的指导下,对数据进行了内容分析。结果MSF的实施过程在政策和卫生系统层面取得或促成了积极的结果。本研究确定了促成这些成功的因素,包括:政治意愿、与国家规划周期和现有卫生系统结构保持一致、广泛的利益攸关方参与以及为确保该进程的背景化和地方所有权而作出的有意努力。如果有更广泛的利益攸关方参与,更好地了解关键的助产和卫生系统概念,以及更强大的数据系统,本可以取得更大的成就。结论未来实施MSF和其他加强助产人员的投资应注意到这些关键的成功因素,并从一开始就有意地“设计”它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Women and Birth
Women and Birth NURSING-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.20%
发文量
371
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews. Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.
期刊最新文献
The transition to motherhood among first-time mothers in China during the first six months postpartum: A qualitative study based on the transition shock model Editorial Board Evaluating midwife-led continuity of care and breastfeeding outcomes: A quasi-experimental study ‘Making it up as we go’: Midwives’ perceptions of preparedness and role clarity in surrogacy birth care Improving care in pregnancies after perinatal loss: A national survey of maternity services in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1