Kirsty Hughes , Bwalya Mabo , Shree Mandke , Andrea Nove
{"title":"“How are you going to remove that cobweb?” Midwifery Services Framework implementation in Zambia: A case study","authors":"Kirsty Hughes , Bwalya Mabo , Shree Mandke , Andrea Nove","doi":"10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Midwifery Services Framework (MSF) was devised by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) as an evidence-based tool to guide the process of improving sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health services through strengthening and developing the midwifery workforce. The MSF was updated in 2020 and implemented in Zambia in 2020–2023. This study examined the process of MSF implementation in Zambia from the perspectives of individuals and organisations involved in implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We used an Appreciative Inquiry approach to collect qualitative data from nine stakeholders via semi-structured interviews, including representatives of all organizations involved in implementation. Guided by a process evaluation framework, a content analysis was undertaken on the data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The process of MSF implementation achieved or contributed to positive results at a policy and health system level. This study identified factors that contributed to these successes, including: political will, alignment with national planning cycles and existing health system structures, broad stakeholder engagement, and intentional efforts to ensure contextualisation and local ownership of the process. Still more could have been achieved with: even broader stakeholder engagement, better understanding of key midwifery and health system concepts, and stronger data systems.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Future efforts to implement the MSF and other investments in strengthening the midwifery workforce should take note of these key success factors and intentionally ‘design them in’ from the outset.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48868,"journal":{"name":"Women and Birth","volume":"38 2","pages":"Article 101889"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women and Birth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187151922500023X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Midwifery Services Framework (MSF) was devised by the International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) as an evidence-based tool to guide the process of improving sexual, reproductive, maternal, and newborn health services through strengthening and developing the midwifery workforce. The MSF was updated in 2020 and implemented in Zambia in 2020–2023. This study examined the process of MSF implementation in Zambia from the perspectives of individuals and organisations involved in implementation.
Methods
We used an Appreciative Inquiry approach to collect qualitative data from nine stakeholders via semi-structured interviews, including representatives of all organizations involved in implementation. Guided by a process evaluation framework, a content analysis was undertaken on the data.
Results
The process of MSF implementation achieved or contributed to positive results at a policy and health system level. This study identified factors that contributed to these successes, including: political will, alignment with national planning cycles and existing health system structures, broad stakeholder engagement, and intentional efforts to ensure contextualisation and local ownership of the process. Still more could have been achieved with: even broader stakeholder engagement, better understanding of key midwifery and health system concepts, and stronger data systems.
Conclusion
Future efforts to implement the MSF and other investments in strengthening the midwifery workforce should take note of these key success factors and intentionally ‘design them in’ from the outset.
期刊介绍:
Women and Birth is the official journal of the Australian College of Midwives (ACM). It is a midwifery journal that publishes on all matters that affect women and birth, from pre-conceptual counselling, through pregnancy, birth, and the first six weeks postnatal. All papers accepted will draw from and contribute to the relevant contemporary research, policy and/or theoretical literature. We seek research papers, quality assurances papers (with ethical approval) discussion papers, clinical practice papers, case studies and original literature reviews.
Our women-centred focus is inclusive of the family, fetus and newborn, both well and sick, and covers both healthy and complex pregnancies and births. The journal seeks papers that take a woman-centred focus on maternity services, epidemiology, primary health care, reproductive psycho/physiology, midwifery practice, theory, research, education, management and leadership. We also seek relevant papers on maternal mental health and neonatal well-being, natural and complementary therapies, local, national and international policy, management, politics, economics and societal and cultural issues as they affect childbearing women and their families. Topics may include, where appropriate, neonatal care, child and family health, women’s health, related to pregnancy, birth and the postpartum, including lactation. Interprofessional papers relevant to midwifery are welcome. Articles are double blind peer-reviewed, primarily by experts in the field of the submitted work.