Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/cts.70138
Antonino Moschella, Soumaya Mourou, Samantha Perfler, Enrico Zoroddu, Daiana Bezzini, Dorian Soru, Claudia Trignano, Monica Miozzo, Alessio Squassina, Erika Cecchin, Matteo Floris
{"title":"Pharmacogenetic Information on Drug Labels of the Italian Agency of Medicines (AIFA): Actionability and Comparison Across Other Regulatory Agencies","authors":"Antonino Moschella,&nbsp;Soumaya Mourou,&nbsp;Samantha Perfler,&nbsp;Enrico Zoroddu,&nbsp;Daiana Bezzini,&nbsp;Dorian Soru,&nbsp;Claudia Trignano,&nbsp;Monica Miozzo,&nbsp;Alessio Squassina,&nbsp;Erika Cecchin,&nbsp;Matteo Floris","doi":"10.1111/cts.70138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To plan future steps for the implementation and regulation of pharmacogenetic testing, any issue in the management of pharmacogenetic information by regulatory bodies must be identified. In this paper, an analysis of pharmacogenetic information in the summary of product characteristics (SmCPs) of drugs approved by Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) was conducted. Among 4214 SmCPs of 1063 active ingredients, 53.2% (<i>n</i> = 2240) included pharmacogenetic information in at least one section, most frequently for drugs in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical category “Antineoplastic and immunomodulatory agents”. To contextualize these data in the international scenario, a pharmacogenetic level of actionability, based on AIFA SmCPs, was assigned to 608 drug/gene pairs included in FDA's “Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels”, according to PharmGKB (The Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base). Approximately 67% of drug/gene pairs were deemed classifiable: Based on SmCPs phrasing, for half of them the genetic testing was cataloged as “required” or “recommended” (mainly tumor somatic variants), whereas 40% as “actionable” (mostly PK/PD-related germline variants). The comparison with other regulatory agencies highlighted a discordance in the assigned pharmacogenetic levels of actionability ranging from 1% to 14%. This discrepancy may also point out the need to rethink the language used in AIFA-approved SmCPs to clarify whether a pharmacogenetic test is necessary or not and for which subjects it has been recommended. For the first time, a detailed evaluation and comparative analysis of the pharmacogenetic information on Italian SmCPs was presented, placing it in an international context and laying the groundwork for rethinking pharmacogenetic indications in AIFA-approved SmCPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70138","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To plan future steps for the implementation and regulation of pharmacogenetic testing, any issue in the management of pharmacogenetic information by regulatory bodies must be identified. In this paper, an analysis of pharmacogenetic information in the summary of product characteristics (SmCPs) of drugs approved by Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) was conducted. Among 4214 SmCPs of 1063 active ingredients, 53.2% (n = 2240) included pharmacogenetic information in at least one section, most frequently for drugs in the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical category “Antineoplastic and immunomodulatory agents”. To contextualize these data in the international scenario, a pharmacogenetic level of actionability, based on AIFA SmCPs, was assigned to 608 drug/gene pairs included in FDA's “Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels”, according to PharmGKB (The Pharmacogenomics Knowledge Base). Approximately 67% of drug/gene pairs were deemed classifiable: Based on SmCPs phrasing, for half of them the genetic testing was cataloged as “required” or “recommended” (mainly tumor somatic variants), whereas 40% as “actionable” (mostly PK/PD-related germline variants). The comparison with other regulatory agencies highlighted a discordance in the assigned pharmacogenetic levels of actionability ranging from 1% to 14%. This discrepancy may also point out the need to rethink the language used in AIFA-approved SmCPs to clarify whether a pharmacogenetic test is necessary or not and for which subjects it has been recommended. For the first time, a detailed evaluation and comparative analysis of the pharmacogenetic information on Italian SmCPs was presented, placing it in an international context and laying the groundwork for rethinking pharmacogenetic indications in AIFA-approved SmCPs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
意大利药品管理局(AIFA)药品标签的药理学信息:可操作性和其他监管机构的比较
为了规划药物遗传检测的实施和监管的未来步骤,监管机构必须确定药物遗传信息管理中的任何问题。本文对意大利药品管理局(AIFA)批准的药品的产品特征摘要(SmCPs)中的药物遗传信息进行了分析。在包含1063种有效成分的4214份smcp中,53.2% (n = 2240)在至少一个章节中包含药理学信息,最常见的是解剖治疗化学类别“抗肿瘤和免疫调节剂”的药物。根据PharmGKB(药物基因组学知识库),基于AIFA SmCPs的药物遗传学可操作性水平被分配到FDA“药物标签中的药物基因组学生物标志物表”中的608种药物/基因对。大约67%的药物/基因对被认为是可分类的:根据SmCPs的措辞,其中一半的基因检测被归类为“必需的”或“推荐的”(主要是肿瘤体细胞变异),而40%的基因检测被归类为“可操作的”(主要是PK/ pd相关的生殖系变异)。与其他监管机构的比较突出了指定的可操作性药理学水平在1%至14%之间的不一致。这一差异也可能指出需要重新考虑aifa批准的smcp中使用的语言,以澄清药物遗传学检测是否必要以及推荐用于哪些受试者。本文首次对意大利smcp的药理学信息进行了详细的评价和比较分析,将其置于国际背景下,并为重新思考aifa批准的smcp的药理学适应症奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Population Pharmacokinetic Model Assessment of the Effects of Body Weight on Risk of Drug-Drug Interactions After Posaconazole Discontinuation. Population-Based Modeling to Predict Human PK/PD of TAK-500, an Anti-CCR2 Antibody-Drug Conjugate for First-in-Human Study in Cancer Patients. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Single and Multiple Doses of Molnupiravir in Healthy Male Chinese Adults: An Open-Label, Fixed Sequence, Phase 1 Study. Causal Effects of Renin–Angiotensin–Aldosterone System Inhibition on Renal Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Quasi-Experimental Study Author Number May Matter in Determining Author Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1