Are Bilinguals More Creative Than Monolinguals? A Meta-Analysis

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL Journal of Creative Behavior Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1002/jocb.1521
Selcuk Acar, Bhoj Balayar, Hatice Nur Ozcelik, Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin
{"title":"Are Bilinguals More Creative Than Monolinguals? A Meta-Analysis","authors":"Selcuk Acar,&nbsp;Bhoj Balayar,&nbsp;Hatice Nur Ozcelik,&nbsp;Anatoliy V. Kharkhurin","doi":"10.1002/jocb.1521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This study synthesizes quantitative research on the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. Extant literature underlines the role of developmental, cognitive, and socio-cultural factors to explain the nature of the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. While decades of research frequently indicate a positive link, contrary or mixed evidence has also been documented, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of existing quantitative data to understand the direction and strength of this relationship. Additionally, identifying factors contributing to inconsistent outcomes is crucial. Thus, we estimated the mean effects and examined various potential sources of variation, including study and participant characteristics, as well as measurement and bilingualism-related factors, to shed light into the heterogeneity. Addressing these objectives, we analyzed 312 effect sizes from 39 studies (<i>N</i> = 4,917) and found a mean effect size of Pearson <i>r</i> = .181, 95% CI [.096, .263]. This finding shows that bilinguals are overall more creative than monolinguals. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the mean effects between test modality categories, with studies using numerical modality reporting significantly larger effect sizes compared to those using action/movement modality. We discuss the findings with research and practical implications.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":39915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Behavior","volume":"58 4","pages":"755-776"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jocb.1521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study synthesizes quantitative research on the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. Extant literature underlines the role of developmental, cognitive, and socio-cultural factors to explain the nature of the relationship between creativity and bilingualism. While decades of research frequently indicate a positive link, contrary or mixed evidence has also been documented, necessitating a comprehensive analysis of existing quantitative data to understand the direction and strength of this relationship. Additionally, identifying factors contributing to inconsistent outcomes is crucial. Thus, we estimated the mean effects and examined various potential sources of variation, including study and participant characteristics, as well as measurement and bilingualism-related factors, to shed light into the heterogeneity. Addressing these objectives, we analyzed 312 effect sizes from 39 studies (N = 4,917) and found a mean effect size of Pearson r = .181, 95% CI [.096, .263]. This finding shows that bilinguals are overall more creative than monolinguals. Furthermore, a significant difference was observed in the mean effects between test modality categories, with studies using numerical modality reporting significantly larger effect sizes compared to those using action/movement modality. We discuss the findings with research and practical implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双语者比单语者更有创造力吗?一个荟萃分析
本研究综合了创造性与双语关系的定量研究。现有文献强调了发展、认知和社会文化因素在解释创造力和双语之间关系的本质方面的作用。虽然数十年的研究经常表明两者之间存在积极联系,但也有相反或混合的证据,因此有必要对现有的定量数据进行全面分析,以了解这种关系的方向和强度。此外,确定导致结果不一致的因素至关重要。因此,我们估计了平均效应,并检查了各种潜在的变异来源,包括研究和参与者特征,以及测量和双语相关因素,以阐明异质性。为了实现这些目标,我们分析了来自39项研究(N = 4,917)的312个效应量,并发现Pearson的平均效应量r =。181, 95% ci[。096年,.263]。这一发现表明,双语者总体上比单语者更有创造力。此外,在测试模态类别之间的平均效应中观察到显著差异,与使用动作/运动模态的研究相比,使用数值模态的研究报告的效应显著更大。我们讨论了研究结果和实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Creative Behavior
Journal of Creative Behavior Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Behavior is our quarterly academic journal citing the most current research in creative thinking. For nearly four decades JCB has been the benchmark scientific periodical in the field. It provides up to date cutting-edge ideas about creativity in education, psychology, business, arts and more.
期刊最新文献
Beyond Imagination: Developing and Validating the Young Children's Inventory of Creative Activities The PISA 2022 Creative Thinking Assessment: A Welcome Opportunity to Explore the Mechanics of Flexibility Scoring Cognitive Conflict in Rule Violation and Creativity: Evidence for a Shared Cognitive Basis Do Fans of Violent Stories Show a Higher Potential for Creative Harm? True Crime as a Stimulating Environment for Malevolent Creativity Using Immersive Technology to Understand the Effect of Emotional Shift on Creativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1