Aesthetic and functional outcomes in full thickness nasal alar reconstruction: Insights from patients on conchal cartilage and nasolabial-folded-flap

Eye & ENT Research Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1002/eer3.18
Lukas S. Fiedler, S. Andrianopoulou, Tobias Meyer
{"title":"Aesthetic and functional outcomes in full thickness nasal alar reconstruction: Insights from patients on conchal cartilage and nasolabial-folded-flap","authors":"Lukas S. Fiedler,&nbsp;S. Andrianopoulou,&nbsp;Tobias Meyer","doi":"10.1002/eer3.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Nasal alar defects pose significant challenges due to the nose's central role in facial aesthetics and function. Various causes, including skin cancer resection, necessitate effective reconstruction techniques. Despite several available methods, identifying an ideal approach remains elusive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study introduces a single-stage reconstruction technique employing the nasolabial-folded-flap (NFL) with conchal cartilage support. A structured patient questionnaire evaluated functional and aesthetic outcomes, pain, healing and satisfaction. The survey involved six patients who underwent nasal reconstruction using this approach in 12 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Patients expressed high satisfaction with functional and aesthetic outcomes. Functional aspects received very satisfactory ratings (mean 1.7), with aesthetically appealing results (mean 2). Reconstructed noses harmonized well with patients' faces (mean 2), with a moderate impact on daily activities (mean 2.7). Mild pain was occasionally reported (median 2.2) and healing was perceived as very successful (median 1.5). Patients were highly satisfied with care and support (median 1) and felt adequately informed (median 1.5). They strongly recommended this reconstruction technique to others (median 1).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>The NFL with conchal cartilage support proves versatile and cosmetically pleasing in single-stage reconstruction for full-thickness nasal alar defects. Patients demonstrated a strong willingness to recommend this approach to individuals with similar defects, showcasing its potential advantages. Despite limitations, our findings underscore the prospects of this technique in nasal reconstruction.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100519,"journal":{"name":"Eye & ENT Research","volume":"1 2","pages":"104-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eer3.18","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & ENT Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eer3.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Nasal alar defects pose significant challenges due to the nose's central role in facial aesthetics and function. Various causes, including skin cancer resection, necessitate effective reconstruction techniques. Despite several available methods, identifying an ideal approach remains elusive.

Methods

This study introduces a single-stage reconstruction technique employing the nasolabial-folded-flap (NFL) with conchal cartilage support. A structured patient questionnaire evaluated functional and aesthetic outcomes, pain, healing and satisfaction. The survey involved six patients who underwent nasal reconstruction using this approach in 12 months.

Results

Patients expressed high satisfaction with functional and aesthetic outcomes. Functional aspects received very satisfactory ratings (mean 1.7), with aesthetically appealing results (mean 2). Reconstructed noses harmonized well with patients' faces (mean 2), with a moderate impact on daily activities (mean 2.7). Mild pain was occasionally reported (median 2.2) and healing was perceived as very successful (median 1.5). Patients were highly satisfied with care and support (median 1) and felt adequately informed (median 1.5). They strongly recommended this reconstruction technique to others (median 1).

Discussion

The NFL with conchal cartilage support proves versatile and cosmetically pleasing in single-stage reconstruction for full-thickness nasal alar defects. Patients demonstrated a strong willingness to recommend this approach to individuals with similar defects, showcasing its potential advantages. Despite limitations, our findings underscore the prospects of this technique in nasal reconstruction.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全层鼻翼重建的美学和功能效果:来自耳甲软骨和鼻唇折叠皮瓣患者的见解
鼻翼缺损是鼻部在面部美学和功能上的中心角色,因此对鼻翼缺损提出了重大挑战。各种原因,包括皮肤癌切除,需要有效的重建技术。尽管有几种可用的方法,确定一个理想的方法仍然是难以捉摸的。方法采用鼻唇折叠皮瓣(NFL)作为鼻甲软骨支撑,进行一期重建。一个结构化的患者问卷评估功能和美学结果、疼痛、愈合和满意度。该调查涉及6名患者,他们在12个月内使用这种方法进行了鼻腔重建。结果患者对手术功能及美观满意。功能方面获得了非常满意的评分(平均1.7分),美观的结果(平均2分)。重建的鼻子与患者的面部很协调(平均2分),对日常活动的影响适中(平均2.7分)。偶尔报告轻度疼痛(中位数2.2),并且认为愈合非常成功(中位数1.5)。患者对护理和支持非常满意(中位数为1),并感到充分了解(中位数为1.5)。他们向其他人强烈推荐这种重建技术(中位1)。讨论带耳甲软骨支持的NFL在单阶段重建全层鼻翼缺损中证明了其多功能性和美观性。患者表现出强烈的意愿,将这种方法推荐给具有类似缺陷的个体,显示出其潜在的优势。尽管存在局限性,我们的研究结果强调了该技术在鼻腔重建中的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Application of optimized postoperative drainage pressure combined with parathyroid function monitoring in enhanced recovery after surgery for thyroid cancer: A prospective randomized controlled study Case report and surgical technique—Nasal mass seen in Zimmermann-Laband syndrome Targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin in nasal type 2 inflammation Investigating the mechanisms of capsicum in age-related hearing loss: Based on network pharmacology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1