Powering the circular future: Climate change and economic perspectives on second-life batteries in the Belgian context

IF 5.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Industrial Ecology Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI:10.1111/jiec.13566
Dominik Huber, Anne van den Oever, Maeva Lavigne Philippot, Daniele Costa, Thierry Coosemans, Maarten Messagie
{"title":"Powering the circular future: Climate change and economic perspectives on second-life batteries in the Belgian context","authors":"Dominik Huber,&nbsp;Anne van den Oever,&nbsp;Maeva Lavigne Philippot,&nbsp;Daniele Costa,&nbsp;Thierry Coosemans,&nbsp;Maarten Messagie","doi":"10.1111/jiec.13566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper calculates the future levelized cost of storage (LCOS) and conducts a prospective life cycle assessment (PLCA) for second-life batteries (SLB) in Flanders, Belgium. A cradle-to-grave approach is chosen for climate change (CC) and economic impacts of SLB. Impacts of processes related to the first and the second life are allocated according to the delivered electricity. Furthermore, impacts are determined according to their temporal occurrence. For LCOS, activities are time adjusted by discounting. For PLCA, new background databases are generated and changed based on the activities occurrence in time. Additionally, future CC impact of three Belgian energy paths is modeled, introducing user-defined scenarios of PLCA. To conceptualize impacts, three use cases are defined: (a) residential, (b) industrial and (c) utility use case (UTI). The residential and industrial use cases (INDs) represent photovoltaic (PV) installations with battery storage, the UTI is a large-scale battery participating in the Belgian secondary reserve market. Lowest LCOS of the SLB in 2050 are found in the IND, namely 39.66 €/MWh, and are below the benchmark batteries. CC impact of SLB in the residential is 58.7 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mtext>gCO</mtext>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>eq</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\text{gCO}_2{\\rm eq}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/kWh and below the benchmark batteries. The CC impact of SLB is 75.2 and 78.5 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mtext>gCO</mtext>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n <mi>eq</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\text{gCO}_2{\\rm eq}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>/kWh in the industrial and UTI and thus higher than the benchmark batteries. Crucial for both assessments are increased dismantling and repurposing facility throughput, fair charging tariffs, the manufacturing, the charging electricity generated by PV installations, and power electronics. On the contrary, changing the background does not lead to major changes in CC.</p>","PeriodicalId":16050,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","volume":"28 6","pages":"1940-1951"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jiec.13566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jiec.13566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper calculates the future levelized cost of storage (LCOS) and conducts a prospective life cycle assessment (PLCA) for second-life batteries (SLB) in Flanders, Belgium. A cradle-to-grave approach is chosen for climate change (CC) and economic impacts of SLB. Impacts of processes related to the first and the second life are allocated according to the delivered electricity. Furthermore, impacts are determined according to their temporal occurrence. For LCOS, activities are time adjusted by discounting. For PLCA, new background databases are generated and changed based on the activities occurrence in time. Additionally, future CC impact of three Belgian energy paths is modeled, introducing user-defined scenarios of PLCA. To conceptualize impacts, three use cases are defined: (a) residential, (b) industrial and (c) utility use case (UTI). The residential and industrial use cases (INDs) represent photovoltaic (PV) installations with battery storage, the UTI is a large-scale battery participating in the Belgian secondary reserve market. Lowest LCOS of the SLB in 2050 are found in the IND, namely 39.66 €/MWh, and are below the benchmark batteries. CC impact of SLB in the residential is 58.7 gCO 2 eq $\text{gCO}_2{\rm eq}$ /kWh and below the benchmark batteries. The CC impact of SLB is 75.2 and 78.5 gCO 2 eq $\text{gCO}_2{\rm eq}$ /kWh in the industrial and UTI and thus higher than the benchmark batteries. Crucial for both assessments are increased dismantling and repurposing facility throughput, fair charging tariffs, the manufacturing, the charging electricity generated by PV installations, and power electronics. On the contrary, changing the background does not lead to major changes in CC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为循环未来提供动力:比利时环境下二次电池的气候变化和经济前景
本文计算了未来的平准化存储成本(LCOS),并对比利时法兰德斯的二次寿命电池(SLB)进行了前瞻性生命周期评估(PLCA)。本文选择了一个从摇篮到坟墓的方法来分析气候变化(CC)和SLB的经济影响。与第一和第二寿命相关的过程的影响根据输送的电力进行分配。此外,影响是根据其发生的时间来确定的。对于LCOS,活动通过贴现进行时间调整。对于PLCA来说,新的后台数据库是根据实时发生的活动生成和更改的。此外,对比利时三种能源路径的未来CC影响进行了建模,引入了用户自定义的PLCA场景。为了概念化影响,定义了三个用例:(a)住宅用例,(b)工业用例和(c)公用事业用例(UTI)。住宅和工业用例(INDs)代表具有电池存储的光伏(PV)装置,UTI是参与比利时二级储备市场的大型电池。2050年SLB的最低LCOS出现在IND,为39.66欧元/兆瓦时,低于基准电池。SLB在住宅中的CC影响为58.7 gCO 2 eq $\text{gCO}_2{\rm eq}$ /kWh,低于基准电池。SLB在工业和UTI中的CC影响分别为75.2和78.5 gCO 2 eq $\text{gCO}_2{\rm eq}$ /kWh,高于基准电池。对这两项评估至关重要的是增加拆解和重新利用设施的吞吐量、公平的收费关税、制造、光伏装置产生的充电电力和电力电子设备。相反,改变背景并不会导致CC发生重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Industrial Ecology
Journal of Industrial Ecology 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Industrial Ecology addresses a series of related topics: material and energy flows studies (''industrial metabolism'') technological change dematerialization and decarbonization life cycle planning, design and assessment design for the environment extended producer responsibility (''product stewardship'') eco-industrial parks (''industrial symbiosis'') product-oriented environmental policy eco-efficiency Journal of Industrial Ecology is open to and encourages submissions that are interdisciplinary in approach. In addition to more formal academic papers, the journal seeks to provide a forum for continuing exchange of information and opinions through contributions from scholars, environmental managers, policymakers, advocates and others involved in environmental science, management and policy.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information, Cover, and Table of Contents Correction to “Can global modern slavery be footprinted for corporate due diligence? A data review and analysis” From variance to value: Stabilizing circular exchanges in industrial symbiosis networks Geographic, sectoral, and constituent characteristics of US off-site manufacturing wastewater disposal Linking cell design and production energy demand to estimate environmental impacts of NMC lithium-ion batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1