Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Clinical and Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2
Caterina Baldi, Stefano Gentileschi, Francesca Li Gobbi, Massimiliano Cazzato, Andrea Delle Sedie, Carla Gaggiano, Emilio D'Ignazio, Gemma Lepri, Chiara De Lorenzo, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Anna Panaccione, Luca Di Cato, Andrea Di Matteo, Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti, Serena Guiducci, Bruno Frediani, Maurizio Benucci
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study.","authors":"Caterina Baldi, Stefano Gentileschi, Francesca Li Gobbi, Massimiliano Cazzato, Andrea Delle Sedie, Carla Gaggiano, Emilio D'Ignazio, Gemma Lepri, Chiara De Lorenzo, Carlotta Nannini, Laura Niccoli, Anna Panaccione, Luca Di Cato, Andrea Di Matteo, Andrea Picchianti-Diamanti, Serena Guiducci, Bruno Frediani, Maurizio Benucci","doi":"10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":10337,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"50"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10238-025-01578-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates upadacitinib (UPA) effectiveness and drug retention rate (DRR) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Multicentre prospective observational study. Consecutive patients with RA receiving UPA were evaluated at 0, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months of treatment. Key outcomes included UPA DRR and changes in clinical and serological measures over time. The study included 215 patients (72.6% female sex, mean age 60.1 ± 11.7 years). The DRR of UPA was 91.6% (95% CI 88.0-95.4%) at 6 months, 84.6% (95% CI 79.8-89.7%) at 12 months, 80.3% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 18 months and 80% (95% CI 75.0-86.0%) at 24 months. UPA DRR was similar between monotherapy and methotrexate combination (p = 0.47), and across different treatment lines (p = 0.58). A statistically significant improvement from baseline was observed over 24 months considering erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein (CRP), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Disease Activity Score (DAS)28-CRP, Physician's (Ph) and Patient's (Pt) Global Assessment (GA), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain, Simplified and Clinical Disease Activity Index (SDAI and CDAI) (p < 0.00 for all of them). Patients discontinuing UPA were more likely to be male (p = 0.02), with a longer disease duration (p = 0.03), higher baseline values of VAS Pain (p < 0.00), PtGA (p < 0.00), PhGA (p < 0.00), CDAI (p < 0.00), SDAI (p < 0.00) and corticosteroid dosage (p = 0.04). This study confirms UPA effectiveness in managing RA in the real-world practice, demonstrating sustained drug retention and improvements in clinical and laboratory measures over time. Also, UPA could be a valuable option for patients with multi-refractory RA and when monotherapy is preferred.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Clinical and Experimental Medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
159
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Medicine (CEM) is a multidisciplinary journal that aims to be a forum of scientific excellence and information exchange in relation to the basic and clinical features of the following fields: hematology, onco-hematology, oncology, virology, immunology, and rheumatology. The journal publishes reviews and editorials, experimental and preclinical studies, translational research, prospectively designed clinical trials, and epidemiological studies. Papers containing new clinical or experimental data that are likely to contribute to changes in clinical practice or the way in which a disease is thought about will be given priority due to their immediate importance. Case reports will be accepted on an exceptional basis only, and their submission is discouraged. The major criteria for publication are clarity, scientific soundness, and advances in knowledge. In compliance with the overwhelmingly prevailing request by the international scientific community, and with respect for eco-compatibility issues, CEM is now published exclusively online.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacogenomic insights: IL-23R and ATG-10 polymorphisms in Sorafenib response for hepatocellular carcinoma. Real-world effectiveness and retention rate of upadacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from a multicentre study. Role of CD4+ T cell-derived cytokines in the pathogenesis of uveitis. Clinicopathologic predictors of renal response and survival in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with renal injury: a retrospective study. CircRNA circACTN4 Promotes the Progression of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Targeting the miR-424-5p/NCAPG/Wnt Axis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1