Longitudinal immunogenicity cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines across individuals with different immunocompromising conditions: heterogeneity in the immune response and crucial role of Omicron-adapted booster doses.

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105577
Annalisa Ciabattini, Elena Pettini, Fabio Fiorino, Jacopo Polvere, Simone Lucchesi, Chiara Coppola, Simone Costagli, Gabiria Pastore, Anna Sicuranza, Monica Tozzi, Arianna Lippi, Francesca Panza, Monica Bocchia, Alessandro Bucalossi, Guido Garosi, David Bennett, Sonia Bernazzali, Massimiliano Fabbiani, Francesca Montagnani, Donata Medaglini
{"title":"Longitudinal immunogenicity cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines across individuals with different immunocompromising conditions: heterogeneity in the immune response and crucial role of Omicron-adapted booster doses.","authors":"Annalisa Ciabattini, Elena Pettini, Fabio Fiorino, Jacopo Polvere, Simone Lucchesi, Chiara Coppola, Simone Costagli, Gabiria Pastore, Anna Sicuranza, Monica Tozzi, Arianna Lippi, Francesca Panza, Monica Bocchia, Alessandro Bucalossi, Guido Garosi, David Bennett, Sonia Bernazzali, Massimiliano Fabbiani, Francesca Montagnani, Donata Medaglini","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, being more susceptible to infections, are a priority for vaccination. Here, we determined and compared in a longitudinal study the immune response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across different groups of individuals who are immunocompromised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the PatoVac_COV longitudinal prospective single-centre study, the spike-specific B cell and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were compared across 5 different groups of individuals with haematological malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell (HCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT), undergoing haemodialysis, and people living with HIV (PLWH), for a total of 585 participants. Data from participants who were immunocompromised were compared to a group of 123 participants who were immunocompetent. Blood samples were collected before and after each vaccine administration, up to 2 years.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A different immune responsiveness was observed after the first two vaccine doses, with haematological, haemodialysis, and SOT participants showing reduced responsiveness compared to HCT and PLWH, and relative to the comparison group. Spike-specific B cell response was both slower and lower in all groups except in PLWH when compared to participants who were immunocompetent. However, the first booster dose enhanced both the B and the antibody responses in all groups, that persisted up to 2 years after the first vaccine administration. The administration of Omicron-adapted booster vaccines promoted a primary BA.2 RBD-specific B cell response, especially in participants who were immunocompromised. Despite repeated vaccinations, a subset of persistent low-responders, especially among SOT, was identified.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study highlights the heterogeneous immune response across individuals with different pathologies, the pivotal role of the first booster dose, the primary activation of Omicron-specific B cells elicited by updated variant-adapted vaccines and the persistence of low-responders despite multiple vaccine administrations. These aspects have a clinical relevance for planning vaccination schedules tailored for individuals with different immunocompromising conditions.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by funds from the Department of Medical Biotechnologies of the University of Siena, and from EU within the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Tuscany Health Ecosystem (Project no ECS00000017-THE).</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":"113 ","pages":"105577"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11847306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105577","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, being more susceptible to infections, are a priority for vaccination. Here, we determined and compared in a longitudinal study the immune response elicited by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination across different groups of individuals who are immunocompromised.

Methods: In the PatoVac_COV longitudinal prospective single-centre study, the spike-specific B cell and antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination were compared across 5 different groups of individuals with haematological malignancies, hematopoietic stem cell (HCT) or solid organ transplantation (SOT), undergoing haemodialysis, and people living with HIV (PLWH), for a total of 585 participants. Data from participants who were immunocompromised were compared to a group of 123 participants who were immunocompetent. Blood samples were collected before and after each vaccine administration, up to 2 years.

Findings: A different immune responsiveness was observed after the first two vaccine doses, with haematological, haemodialysis, and SOT participants showing reduced responsiveness compared to HCT and PLWH, and relative to the comparison group. Spike-specific B cell response was both slower and lower in all groups except in PLWH when compared to participants who were immunocompetent. However, the first booster dose enhanced both the B and the antibody responses in all groups, that persisted up to 2 years after the first vaccine administration. The administration of Omicron-adapted booster vaccines promoted a primary BA.2 RBD-specific B cell response, especially in participants who were immunocompromised. Despite repeated vaccinations, a subset of persistent low-responders, especially among SOT, was identified.

Interpretation: Our study highlights the heterogeneous immune response across individuals with different pathologies, the pivotal role of the first booster dose, the primary activation of Omicron-specific B cells elicited by updated variant-adapted vaccines and the persistence of low-responders despite multiple vaccine administrations. These aspects have a clinical relevance for planning vaccination schedules tailored for individuals with different immunocompromising conditions.

Funding: This work was supported by funds from the Department of Medical Biotechnologies of the University of Siena, and from EU within the NextGenerationEU-MUR PNRR Tuscany Health Ecosystem (Project no ECS00000017-THE).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同免疫功能低下个体间SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗的纵向免疫原性队列研究:免疫反应的异质性和适用于omicron的加强剂量的关键作用
背景:具有原发性和继发性免疫缺陷的个体,更容易受到感染,是优先接种疫苗的对象。在这里,我们在一项纵向研究中确定并比较了不同免疫功能低下人群中接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗引起的免疫反应。方法:在PatoVac_COV纵向前瞻性单中心研究中,比较了5组不同的血液恶性肿瘤患者、造血干细胞(HCT)或实体器官移植(SOT)、接受血液透析的个体和HIV感染者(PLWH)对SARS-CoV-2 mRNA疫苗接种的特异性B细胞和抗体反应,共585名参与者。将来自免疫功能低下参与者的数据与123名免疫功能正常参与者的数据进行比较。每次接种疫苗前后采集血液样本,最长可达2年。研究结果:在前两剂疫苗接种后观察到不同的免疫反应性,与HCT和PLWH相比,血液学、血液透析和SOT参与者的反应性降低,与对照组相比。与免疫功能正常的参与者相比,除PLWH外,所有组的spike特异性B细胞反应都较慢且较低。然而,第一次加强剂量在所有组中都增强了B和抗体反应,这种情况在第一次接种疫苗后持续了2年。适用于ommicron的强化疫苗可促进原发性BA.2 rbd特异性B细胞应答,特别是在免疫功能低下的参与者中。尽管反复接种疫苗,但仍发现了持续低反应的子集,特别是在SOT中。解释:我们的研究强调了不同病理个体的异质免疫反应,第一次加强剂量的关键作用,更新的变异适应疫苗引起的omicron特异性B细胞的初级激活,以及多次接种疫苗后低反应的持久性。这些方面对规划针对不同免疫损害情况的个体量身定制的疫苗接种时间表具有临床意义。经费:这项工作得到了锡耶纳大学医学生物技术系和欧盟下一代欧盟- mur PNRR托斯卡纳健康生态系统(项目编号ecs00000017 -)的资金支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the quality of AI-generated and physician-written discharge summaries: evaluation of an EHR-integrated tool in a Dutch academic hospital. The AGPS regulatory variant rs113671272 confers esophageal squamous cell carcinoma susceptibility through allele-specific MEIS3 binding and NF-κB activation in Chinese populations. irAE-GPT: leveraging large language models to identify immune-related adverse events in electronic health records and clinical trial datasets. Molecular pathways driving clarithromycin benefit in community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the ACCESS randomised trial. Corrigendum to Overexpression of PIMREG promotes breast cancer aggressiveness via constitutive activation of NF-κB signaling EBioMedicine, Volume 43, (2019), Pages 188-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.04.001.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1