Refining imaging criteria for mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver: simplified diagnostic approach.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s00330-025-11407-5
Seong Uk Kim, Jeong Ah Hwang, Seungchul Han, Jeong Hyun Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Sang Yun Ha
{"title":"Refining imaging criteria for mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver: simplified diagnostic approach.","authors":"Seong Uk Kim, Jeong Ah Hwang, Seungchul Han, Jeong Hyun Lee, Seo-Youn Choi, Sang Yun Ha","doi":"10.1007/s00330-025-11407-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To propose a simplified diagnostic approach for mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the liver and compare its diagnostic performance with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 124 patients with pathologically confirmed lesions (13 MCNs, 111 hepatic cysts) who underwent CT/MRI between January 2016 and January 2023. Two major features (thick septation, nodularity) and five minor features (upstream biliary dilatation, thin septations, internal hemorrhage, perfusion change, < 3 coexistent hepatic cysts) of the EASL criteria were evaluated. For a septa-wall relationship, the angle of indentation was measured, and the optimal angle predicting MCN was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Logistic regression identified features predicting MCN, and a modified criteria was developed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both criteria were compared using McNemar's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal indentation angle was 111°. Absence of indentation or indentation at an angle > 111° (odds ratio (OR), 100.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-2076.0) and < 3 coexistent hepatic cysts (OR, 47.8; 95% CI, 1.5-1489.1) were independent features predicting MCN. Our modified criteria used a combination of them and demonstrated greater accuracy (98.4% vs. 92.7%; p = 0.035) than the EASL criteria (a combination of ≥ 1 major and ≥ 1 minor feature[s]), with comparable sensitivity (92.3% vs. 76.9%; p = 0.317) and specificity (99.1% vs. 94.6%; p = 0.059).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our modified criteria using two imaging features may be a promising alternative to current EASL criteria to improve accuracy in diagnosing MCN.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question Radiological diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver remains challenging due to the lack of specific imaging features, leading to suboptimal treatment decisions. Findings No external indentation or an indentation angle > 111° and fewer than 3 coexistent hepatic cysts are independent factors predicting mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver. Clinical relevance The simplified approach using these two imaging features for diagnosing mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver offers improved accuracy and reliability over the 2022 EASL criteria, potentially reducing misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"4993-5003"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11407-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To propose a simplified diagnostic approach for mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the liver and compare its diagnostic performance with the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 124 patients with pathologically confirmed lesions (13 MCNs, 111 hepatic cysts) who underwent CT/MRI between January 2016 and January 2023. Two major features (thick septation, nodularity) and five minor features (upstream biliary dilatation, thin septations, internal hemorrhage, perfusion change, < 3 coexistent hepatic cysts) of the EASL criteria were evaluated. For a septa-wall relationship, the angle of indentation was measured, and the optimal angle predicting MCN was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Logistic regression identified features predicting MCN, and a modified criteria was developed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of both criteria were compared using McNemar's test.

Results: The optimal indentation angle was 111°. Absence of indentation or indentation at an angle > 111° (odds ratio (OR), 100.4; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.9-2076.0) and < 3 coexistent hepatic cysts (OR, 47.8; 95% CI, 1.5-1489.1) were independent features predicting MCN. Our modified criteria used a combination of them and demonstrated greater accuracy (98.4% vs. 92.7%; p = 0.035) than the EASL criteria (a combination of ≥ 1 major and ≥ 1 minor feature[s]), with comparable sensitivity (92.3% vs. 76.9%; p = 0.317) and specificity (99.1% vs. 94.6%; p = 0.059).

Conclusion: Our modified criteria using two imaging features may be a promising alternative to current EASL criteria to improve accuracy in diagnosing MCN.

Key points: Question Radiological diagnosis of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver remains challenging due to the lack of specific imaging features, leading to suboptimal treatment decisions. Findings No external indentation or an indentation angle > 111° and fewer than 3 coexistent hepatic cysts are independent factors predicting mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver. Clinical relevance The simplified approach using these two imaging features for diagnosing mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver offers improved accuracy and reliability over the 2022 EASL criteria, potentially reducing misdiagnosis and unnecessary surgeries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改进肝脏粘液囊性肿瘤的影像学标准:简化诊断方法。
目的:提出一种肝脏粘液囊性肿瘤(MCN)的简化诊断方法,并将其诊断性能与欧洲肝脏研究协会(EASL)标准进行比较。方法:我们对2016年1月至2023年1月期间接受CT/MRI检查的124例病理证实病变(13例mcn, 111例肝囊肿)患者进行了回顾性队列研究。2个主要特征(粗分隔、结节性)和5个次要特征(胆道上游扩张、细分隔、内出血、灌注改变)。结果:最佳压痕角度为111°。无压痕或角度为bbbb111°的压痕(优势比(or), 100.4;95%可信区间(CI), 4.9-2076.0)和结论:我们使用两个影像学特征的改进标准可能是目前EASL标准的一个有希望的替代方案,以提高诊断MCN的准确性。由于缺乏特定的影像学特征,肝脏粘液囊性肿瘤的影像学诊断仍然具有挑战性,导致治疗决策不理想。发现无外部压痕、压痕角度bbb111°、同时存在的肝囊肿少于3个是预测肝脏粘液囊性肿瘤的独立因素。与2022年EASL标准相比,使用这两种影像学特征诊断肝脏粘液囊性肿瘤的简化方法提高了准确性和可靠性,可能减少误诊和不必要的手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Photon-counting CT characterization of carotid perivascular adipose tissue: a layer-by-layer quantitative analysis. A preliminary analysis in an asymptomatic population. Do MRI radiomic models truly generalize? External validation of three studies in parotid lesion characterization. ESR Innovation in Focus: Future PET radiotracers in oncology. CEST-MRI assessment of locally advanced pMMR rectal cancer for prediction of immune activation status following radiotherapy. Application of transformer-enhanced convolutional neural network: multicenter MRI assessment of muscle invasion in bladder cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1