Antireflux surgeries and hiatal repair: keys to success.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1080/17474124.2025.2464039
Abigail Claire Watson, David Ian Watson
{"title":"Antireflux surgeries and hiatal repair: keys to success.","authors":"Abigail Claire Watson, David Ian Watson","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2464039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gastroesophagealreflux is common and when medical therapy is ineffective alternative treatmentsshould be considered. Nissen fundoplication controls reflux but can be followedby side effects such as dysphagia and flatulence. To improve outcomes,modifications have been advocated.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Modificationsto Nissen fundoplication and newer procedures for gastroesophageal reflux aimto improve overall outcome. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and long-termoutcomes from large cohorts are prioritized to consider the optimal procedurefor reflux and hiatus hernia.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Fundoplication an effective treatment for gastroesophagealreflux, with success rates of > 80% reported at 18-20 years follow-up. RCTsconfirm Nissen fundoplication delivers better reflux control than medication.However, some patients are troubled by side effects. Anterior and posteriorpartial fundoplication variants have been proposed as procedures that offer equallygood reflux control, but less side effects, and RCTs have confirmed this withfollow-up to 20 years. Which partial fundoplication is better is debated.Alternative laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches require expensive implants orequipment and deliver less reliable reflux control than partial fundoplication.Currently, level I evidence confirms that laparoscopic partial fundoplicationdelivers the optimal outcome in fit patients with reflux that is not well controlledby medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2464039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gastroesophagealreflux is common and when medical therapy is ineffective alternative treatmentsshould be considered. Nissen fundoplication controls reflux but can be followedby side effects such as dysphagia and flatulence. To improve outcomes,modifications have been advocated.

Areas covered: Modificationsto Nissen fundoplication and newer procedures for gastroesophageal reflux aimto improve overall outcome. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and long-termoutcomes from large cohorts are prioritized to consider the optimal procedurefor reflux and hiatus hernia.

Expert opinion: Fundoplication an effective treatment for gastroesophagealreflux, with success rates of > 80% reported at 18-20 years follow-up. RCTsconfirm Nissen fundoplication delivers better reflux control than medication.However, some patients are troubled by side effects. Anterior and posteriorpartial fundoplication variants have been proposed as procedures that offer equallygood reflux control, but less side effects, and RCTs have confirmed this withfollow-up to 20 years. Which partial fundoplication is better is debated.Alternative laparoscopic or endoscopic approaches require expensive implants orequipment and deliver less reliable reflux control than partial fundoplication.Currently, level I evidence confirms that laparoscopic partial fundoplicationdelivers the optimal outcome in fit patients with reflux that is not well controlledby medication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.
期刊最新文献
Antibiotics in decompensated liver disease - who, when and for how long? Determining the value of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the management of patients with acute pancreatitis and related complications. Gut microbiota: the pathogenetic bridge between inflammatory bowel disease and metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease. Onset of pouchitis after colectomy for ulcerative colitis: reducing the risk. Antireflux surgeries and hiatal repair: keys to success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1