A systematic review and meta-analysis of group-based trajectory modeling of sleep duration across age groups and in relation to health outcomes.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Sleep Pub Date : 2025-04-11 DOI:10.1093/sleep/zsaf021
Wei Wang, Sing-Hang Cheung, Shu Fai Cheung, Rong Wei Sun, C Harry Hui, Ho Yin Derek Ma, Esther Yuet Ying Lau
{"title":"A systematic review and meta-analysis of group-based trajectory modeling of sleep duration across age groups and in relation to health outcomes.","authors":"Wei Wang, Sing-Hang Cheung, Shu Fai Cheung, Rong Wei Sun, C Harry Hui, Ho Yin Derek Ma, Esther Yuet Ying Lau","doi":"10.1093/sleep/zsaf021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>To shed light on understanding sleep duration trajectories (SDTs) using different classification methods and their outcomes, this study aimed to (1) identify common SDTs among different age groups, (2) investigate the alignment versus differences between SDTs identification by group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) and clinical standards, and (3) examine the impacts of SDTs on health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search from four databases yielded 34 longitudinal SDT studies with GBTM analyses spanning three or more data waves. Apart from the proportion meta-analysis, a three-level meta-analysis was conducted with 14 of the studies that examined the association between SDT groups and health outcomes. Assessment of study quality was performed using the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative analysis identified four age-related SDT classes based on longitudinal trends: \"persistent sleepers,\" \"increase sleepers,\" \"decrease sleepers,\" and \"variable sleepers.\" Meta-analysis also showed differential proportions of \"GBTM-defined shortest sleepers\" across age groups and sample regions, as well as significant discrepancies in the prevalence of short sleep identified by clinical standards (=50% vs. 15% per GBTM). Overall, SDTs predicted emotional and behavioral outcomes, neurocognitive problems, and physical health (OR = 1.538, p < 0.001), in GBTM-defined \"short,\" \"fluctuating,\" \"long,\" and \"decreasing\" sleepers as compared to the \"adequate\" group. The effects were stronger in adolescents and in datasets with more waves.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The identification of the GBTM-defined \"short,\" \"fluctuating,\" \"long,\" and \"decreasing\" SDT groups and their associations with various health outcomes supported longitudinal investigations, as well as the development of interventions focusing on both the length and stability of sleep durations, especially in younger populations. Study registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42023412201.</p>","PeriodicalId":22018,"journal":{"name":"Sleep","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11985401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaf021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: To shed light on understanding sleep duration trajectories (SDTs) using different classification methods and their outcomes, this study aimed to (1) identify common SDTs among different age groups, (2) investigate the alignment versus differences between SDTs identification by group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) and clinical standards, and (3) examine the impacts of SDTs on health outcomes.

Methods: A systematic literature search from four databases yielded 34 longitudinal SDT studies with GBTM analyses spanning three or more data waves. Apart from the proportion meta-analysis, a three-level meta-analysis was conducted with 14 of the studies that examined the association between SDT groups and health outcomes. Assessment of study quality was performed using the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies checklist.

Results: Qualitative analysis identified four age-related SDT classes based on longitudinal trends: "persistent sleepers," "increase sleepers," "decrease sleepers," and "variable sleepers." Meta-analysis also showed differential proportions of "GBTM-defined shortest sleepers" across age groups and sample regions, as well as significant discrepancies in the prevalence of short sleep identified by clinical standards (=50% vs. 15% per GBTM). Overall, SDTs predicted emotional and behavioral outcomes, neurocognitive problems, and physical health (OR = 1.538, p < 0.001), in GBTM-defined "short," "fluctuating," "long," and "decreasing" sleepers as compared to the "adequate" group. The effects were stronger in adolescents and in datasets with more waves.

Conclusions: The identification of the GBTM-defined "short," "fluctuating," "long," and "decreasing" SDT groups and their associations with various health outcomes supported longitudinal investigations, as well as the development of interventions focusing on both the length and stability of sleep durations, especially in younger populations. Study registration: PROSPERO registration number CRD42023412201.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾和荟萃分析跨年龄组睡眠持续时间的群体轨迹建模及其与健康结果的关系。
研究目的:为了更好地理解不同分类方法的睡眠持续时间轨迹(sdt)及其结果,本研究旨在1)识别不同年龄组的常见sdt, 2)研究基于群体轨迹模型(GBTM)识别的sdt与临床标准之间的一致性和差异性,以及3)研究sdt对健康结果的影响。方法:从四个数据库中系统检索文献,获得34项纵向SDT研究,其中GBTM分析跨越三个或更多数据波。除了比例荟萃分析外,还对其中14项研究进行了三水平荟萃分析,这些研究检查了SDT组与健康结果之间的关系。使用潜在轨迹研究报告指南清单对研究质量进行评估。结果:定性分析根据纵向趋势确定了四种与年龄相关的SDT类别:“持续睡眠者”、“增加睡眠者”、“减少睡眠者”和“可变睡眠者”。荟萃分析还显示了“GBTM定义的最短睡眠者”在不同年龄组和样本地区的比例差异,以及临床标准确定的短睡眠患病率的显著差异(=50% vs.每个GBTM的15%)。总体而言,与“充足”组相比,在gbtm定义的“短”、“波动”、“长”和“减少”睡眠者中,sdt预测情绪和行为结果、神经认知问题和身体健康(OR = 1.538, p < 0.001)。在青少年和具有更多波的数据集中,效果更强。结论:确定gbtm定义的“短”、“波动”、“长”和“减少”SDT组及其与各种健康结果的关联,支持了纵向调查,以及关注睡眠持续时间长短和稳定性的干预措施的发展,特别是在年轻人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep
Sleep Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
10.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: SLEEP® publishes findings from studies conducted at any level of analysis, including: Genes Molecules Cells Physiology Neural systems and circuits Behavior and cognition Self-report SLEEP® publishes articles that use a wide variety of scientific approaches and address a broad range of topics. These may include, but are not limited to: Basic and neuroscience studies of sleep and circadian mechanisms In vitro and animal models of sleep, circadian rhythms, and human disorders Pre-clinical human investigations, including the measurement and manipulation of sleep and circadian rhythms Studies in clinical or population samples. These may address factors influencing sleep and circadian rhythms (e.g., development and aging, and social and environmental influences) and relationships between sleep, circadian rhythms, health, and disease Clinical trials, epidemiology studies, implementation, and dissemination research.
期刊最新文献
Sleep and circadian health in the UK Biobank: Report on the 2023 sleep questionnaire enhancement. Prescription patterns of hypnotics for children and adolescents in Japan: A descriptive epidemiologic study using a claims database. Glial Contributions to Sleep: Emerging Roles in Expression, Regulation, and Function. Obstructive sleep Apnea, lipoprotein(a) and long-term cardiovascular outcomes in acute coronary syndrome. Reply to Letter to Editor "Methodological Considerations in Evaluating the Effects of CPAP Therapy on Energy Balance and Body Composition".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1