Mobile Toolbox sequences task: development and validation of a remote, smartphone-based working memory test.

IF 2.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers in Psychology Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497816
Jerry Slotkin, Aaron J Kaat, Stephanie Ruth Young, Elizabeth M Dworak, Miriam A Novack, Yusuke Shono, Hubert Adam, Cindy J Nowinski, Sarah Pila, Zahra Hosseinian, Maria Varela Diaz, Anyelo Almonte-Correa, Keith Alperin, Monica R Camacho, Bernard Landavazo, Rachel L Nosheny, Michael W Weiner, Richard C Gershon
{"title":"Mobile Toolbox sequences task: development and validation of a remote, smartphone-based working memory test.","authors":"Jerry Slotkin, Aaron J Kaat, Stephanie Ruth Young, Elizabeth M Dworak, Miriam A Novack, Yusuke Shono, Hubert Adam, Cindy J Nowinski, Sarah Pila, Zahra Hosseinian, Maria Varela Diaz, Anyelo Almonte-Correa, Keith Alperin, Monica R Camacho, Bernard Landavazo, Rachel L Nosheny, Michael W Weiner, Richard C Gershon","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The ability to assess cognitive skills remotely is increasing with the widespread use and availability of smartphones. The Mobile Toolbox (MTB) is a measurement system that includes Sequences, a new measure of working memory designed specifically for smartphones. This study describes the development of Sequences and presents the studies conducted to evaluate its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a new measure of working memory that can be self-administered remotely using an iOS or Android smartphone. In Sequences, a series of numbers and letters are shown on the screen one at a time, and the participant must first tap the letters they see in alphabetical order, followed by tapping the numbers in ascending numerical order. The Sequences measure was evaluated for usability and feasibility across two pilot studies and then assessed in this validation study (which included a total sample size of <i>N</i> = 1,246). Psychometric properties of the new measure were evaluated in three studies involving participants aged 18-90 years. In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 92), participants completed MTB measures in a laboratory setting. They were also administered both an equivalent NIH Toolbox (NIHTB) measure along with external measures of similar constructs. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 1,007), participants were administered NIHTB measures in the laboratory and then completed MTB measures remotely on their own devices. In Study 3 (<i>N</i> = 147), participants completed MTB measures twice, remotely on their own devices, with a 2-week interval between sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sequences exhibited moderately high correlations with a comparable NIHTB test and external measures of a similar construct, while exhibiting a lower correlation with an unrelated test, as hypothesized. Internal consistency was high, but test-retest reliability was moderate. When controlling for age, phone operating system (iOS vs. Android) and sex assigned at birth did not significantly impact performance; however, there was a significant difference between individuals who completed college and those with a high school education or lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results support the validity of Sequences as a measure of working memory for remote self-administered use. The internal consistency was strong, with moderate test-retest reliability that is likely a function of the test's unproctored self-administration method. The findings suggest that Sequences is appropriate for use with adults aged 18-90 years in remote self-administered designs that focus on group results.</p>","PeriodicalId":12525,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Psychology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1497816"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11794243/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1497816","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The ability to assess cognitive skills remotely is increasing with the widespread use and availability of smartphones. The Mobile Toolbox (MTB) is a measurement system that includes Sequences, a new measure of working memory designed specifically for smartphones. This study describes the development of Sequences and presents the studies conducted to evaluate its psychometric properties.

Methods: We developed a new measure of working memory that can be self-administered remotely using an iOS or Android smartphone. In Sequences, a series of numbers and letters are shown on the screen one at a time, and the participant must first tap the letters they see in alphabetical order, followed by tapping the numbers in ascending numerical order. The Sequences measure was evaluated for usability and feasibility across two pilot studies and then assessed in this validation study (which included a total sample size of N = 1,246). Psychometric properties of the new measure were evaluated in three studies involving participants aged 18-90 years. In Study 1 (N = 92), participants completed MTB measures in a laboratory setting. They were also administered both an equivalent NIH Toolbox (NIHTB) measure along with external measures of similar constructs. In Study 2 (N = 1,007), participants were administered NIHTB measures in the laboratory and then completed MTB measures remotely on their own devices. In Study 3 (N = 147), participants completed MTB measures twice, remotely on their own devices, with a 2-week interval between sessions.

Results: Sequences exhibited moderately high correlations with a comparable NIHTB test and external measures of a similar construct, while exhibiting a lower correlation with an unrelated test, as hypothesized. Internal consistency was high, but test-retest reliability was moderate. When controlling for age, phone operating system (iOS vs. Android) and sex assigned at birth did not significantly impact performance; however, there was a significant difference between individuals who completed college and those with a high school education or lower.

Conclusion: The results support the validity of Sequences as a measure of working memory for remote self-administered use. The internal consistency was strong, with moderate test-retest reliability that is likely a function of the test's unproctored self-administration method. The findings suggest that Sequences is appropriate for use with adults aged 18-90 years in remote self-administered designs that focus on group results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移动工具箱序列任务:开发和验证远程,基于智能手机的工作记忆测试。
目的:随着智能手机的广泛使用和普及,远程评估认知技能的能力正在提高。移动工具箱(MTB)是一个测量系统,包括序列,一个专门为智能手机设计的工作记忆的新测量。本研究描述了序列的发展,并提出了评估其心理测量特性的研究。方法:我们开发了一种新的工作记忆测量方法,可以使用iOS或Android智能手机远程自我管理。在序列中,一系列数字和字母一次一个地显示在屏幕上,参与者必须首先按字母顺序点击他们看到的字母,然后按数字升序点击数字。在两个试点研究中评估了序列测量的可用性和可行性,然后在本验证研究中进行了评估(其中包括总样本量N = 1,246)。新测量的心理测量特性在三个涉及18-90岁参与者的研究中进行了评估。在研究1 (N = 92)中,参与者在实验室环境中完成了MTB测量。他们也接受了等效的NIH工具箱(NIHTB)测量以及类似结构的外部测量。在研究2 (N = 1,007)中,参与者在实验室进行NIHTB测量,然后在他们自己的设备上远程完成MTB测量。在研究3 (N = 147)中,参与者在自己的设备上远程完成两次MTB测量,每次测量间隔2周。结果:序列与类似的NIHTB测试和类似结构的外部测量显示出中等高的相关性,而与不相关的测试显示出较低的相关性,正如假设的那样。内部一致性高,但重测信度中等。在控制年龄时,手机操作系统(iOS vs. Android)和出生性别对表现没有显著影响;然而,完成大学学业的人与高中或更低学历的人之间存在显著差异。结论:结果支持序列作为工作记忆的远程自我管理使用的有效性。内部一致性很强,具有适度的重测信度,这可能是测试未经监督的自我管理方法的功能。研究结果表明,序列适用于18-90岁的成年人,用于远程自我管理设计,重点是群体结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
13.20%
发文量
7396
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Psychology is the largest journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the psychological sciences, from clinical research to cognitive science, from perception to consciousness, from imaging studies to human factors, and from animal cognition to social psychology. Field Chief Editor Axel Cleeremans at the Free University of Brussels is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. The journal publishes the best research across the entire field of psychology. Today, psychological science is becoming increasingly important at all levels of society, from the treatment of clinical disorders to our basic understanding of how the mind works. It is highly interdisciplinary, borrowing questions from philosophy, methods from neuroscience and insights from clinical practice - all in the goal of furthering our grasp of human nature and society, as well as our ability to develop new intervention methods.
期刊最新文献
Beyond emotional intelligence ability: the power of supervisor-subordinate alignment in perceptions of supervisor emotionally intelligent behavior. A network meta-analysis of pedagogical models in physical education: evaluating multidimensional learning outcomes and instructional duration effects. AI-enhanced assessment of psychological resilience: development and validation of a multidimensional psychological model in vocational college students. Correction: Mapping teachers' awareness of artificial intelligence in the changing education paradigm: insights from a mixed methods inquiry. Current status of innovative behaviors among nurses in public hospitals and its influencing factors: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1