The Near Point of Convergence in Patients with Vestibular Migraine.

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2025-02-05 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791643
Francisco Carlos Zuma E Maia, Bernardo Faria Ramos, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Bittar, Renato Valerio Rodrigues Cal, Leonel Almeida Luís, Pedro Luiz Mangabeira Albernaz
{"title":"The Near Point of Convergence in Patients with Vestibular Migraine.","authors":"Francisco Carlos Zuma E Maia, Bernardo Faria Ramos, Roseli Saraiva Moreira Bittar, Renato Valerio Rodrigues Cal, Leonel Almeida Luís, Pedro Luiz Mangabeira Albernaz","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>  Vestibular migraine (VM) is one of the most common vestibular disorders and its diagnosis is based entirely on clinical features. A recent case series suggested a possible link between migraines and convergence insufficiency. <b>Objective</b>  To compare the near point of convergence (NPC) in patients with and without VM. <b>Methods</b>  We retrospectively reviewed the data of 50 patients with and 50 without VM, comparing the NPC between both groups. The NPC was measured according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Differences in the results between groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The association of the NPC with age, gender, and the use of corrective glasses or contact lenses was evaluated by the Student <i>t</i> or Mann-Whitney tests for parametric and nonparametric data, respectively. To determine the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off point, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created. <b>Results</b>  The mean NPC was significantly higher in patients with VM (18.50 ± 5.88 cm) compared to the control group (8.06 ± 1.46 cm; <i>p</i>  < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.986 (95% CI: 0.938-0.999; <i>p</i>  < 0.0001), suggesting that NPC was able to accurately discriminate between patients with and without VM with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. <b>Conclusion</b>  Our results suggest that convergence insufficiency is a common sign in patients with VM and may be considered a potential clinical biomarker. However, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"29 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11798653/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791643","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction  Vestibular migraine (VM) is one of the most common vestibular disorders and its diagnosis is based entirely on clinical features. A recent case series suggested a possible link between migraines and convergence insufficiency. Objective  To compare the near point of convergence (NPC) in patients with and without VM. Methods  We retrospectively reviewed the data of 50 patients with and 50 without VM, comparing the NPC between both groups. The NPC was measured according to the recommendations of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Differences in the results between groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. The association of the NPC with age, gender, and the use of corrective glasses or contact lenses was evaluated by the Student t or Mann-Whitney tests for parametric and nonparametric data, respectively. To determine the diagnostic accuracy and optimal cut-off point, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created. Results  The mean NPC was significantly higher in patients with VM (18.50 ± 5.88 cm) compared to the control group (8.06 ± 1.46 cm; p  < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.986 (95% CI: 0.938-0.999; p  < 0.0001), suggesting that NPC was able to accurately discriminate between patients with and without VM with a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 100%. Conclusion  Our results suggest that convergence insufficiency is a common sign in patients with VM and may be considered a potential clinical biomarker. However, further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前庭偏头痛患者的近收敛点。
前庭偏头痛是最常见的前庭疾病之一,其诊断完全基于临床特征。最近的一系列病例表明偏头痛和收敛功能不全之间可能存在联系。目的比较有和无VM患者的近收敛点(NPC)。方法回顾性分析50例有VM和50例无VM患者的鼻咽癌资料,比较两组间鼻咽癌的差异。鼻咽癌是根据美国眼科学会(American Academy of Ophthalmology)的建议测量的。使用Mann-Whitney检验比较两组结果的差异。NPC与年龄、性别和使用矫正眼镜或隐形眼镜的关系分别通过参数和非参数数据的Student t或Mann-Whitney检验进行评估。为了确定诊断准确性和最佳分界点,建立了受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线。结果VM患者鼻咽癌平均厚度(18.50±5.88 cm)明显高于对照组(8.06±1.46 cm;结论收敛功能不全是VM患者的常见体征,可能被认为是一种潜在的临床生物标志物。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这一假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the Accuracy and User Satisfaction of Culturally-Relevant Kannada-Based Hearing Screening App Compared to Technical Screening Method. Impact of Blood Group on Contralateral Suppression of Otoacoustic Emissions, Speech Perception in Noise, and Binaural Integration. Translation and Validation of the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test (RCAT) for Allergic Rhinitis in Urdu Language. The Temporomandibular Joint Compromise (TMJC) as a Cause of Otoneurological Symptoms: Headaches, Dizziness and Tinnitus. High-Frequency Hearing Loss and Decrease in High-Frequency Hearing Thresholds after Positive Airway Pressure Treatment in Patients with Severe OSA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1