E Gaudio, V J Lipscomb, M Cantatore, K Blacklock, M Gosling, M Jack, T Charlesworth, C J Shales
{"title":"Clinical outcomes and complications of tracheal resection and anastomosis in dogs and cats: 20 cases (2009-2022).","authors":"E Gaudio, V J Lipscomb, M Cantatore, K Blacklock, M Gosling, M Jack, T Charlesworth, C J Shales","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To report clinical presentation, short-term outcome and complications of tracheal resection and anastomosis in dogs and cats.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical records of pets treated with tracheal resection and anastomosis in seven UK-based veterinary referral centres were retrospectively reviewed (2009 to 2022).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty client-owned pets (eight dogs; 12 cats) were included. Clinical signs comprised dyspnoea (n = 15), stridor (n = 5), subcutaneous emphysema (n = 3), pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum (n = 1), coughing (n = 3), regurgitation (n = 1) and exercise intolerance (n = 1). Indication for surgery was traumatic tracheal rupture (n = 5), tracheal avulsion (n = 7), neoplasia (n = 5) and stenosis (n = 3). Complications occurred in 15 patients (75%). Non-anastomotic complications occurred in nine patients and consisted of cough (n = 5), self-resolving laryngeal paralysis (n = 1), surgical site infection (n = 1) and septic shock (n = 2). Anastomotic complications occurred in seven patients and consisted of anastomotic dehiscence (n = 1), tracheal stenosis (n = 4) and fatal respiratory failure (n = 2). Revision surgery was performed in two dogs due to anastomotic dehiscence and stenosis, and tracheal stenting was performed in one cat due to stenosis. Sixteen patients survived to hospital discharge and 14 survived to latest follow-up (median: 119 days; range: 14 to 1744). Outcome was scored as excellent in five, good in seven, fair in two and poor in six patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Tracheal resection and anastomosis is the surgical technique of choice to reconstruct tracheal defects. Although more than half of the patients recovered well, high morbidity and mortality rates were documented. This may be due to the severe comorbidities affecting most tracheal resection and anastomosis patients, as well as the client's decision against further treatment when facing serious post-operative complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jsap.13830","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To report clinical presentation, short-term outcome and complications of tracheal resection and anastomosis in dogs and cats.
Materials and methods: Clinical records of pets treated with tracheal resection and anastomosis in seven UK-based veterinary referral centres were retrospectively reviewed (2009 to 2022).
Results: Twenty client-owned pets (eight dogs; 12 cats) were included. Clinical signs comprised dyspnoea (n = 15), stridor (n = 5), subcutaneous emphysema (n = 3), pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum (n = 1), coughing (n = 3), regurgitation (n = 1) and exercise intolerance (n = 1). Indication for surgery was traumatic tracheal rupture (n = 5), tracheal avulsion (n = 7), neoplasia (n = 5) and stenosis (n = 3). Complications occurred in 15 patients (75%). Non-anastomotic complications occurred in nine patients and consisted of cough (n = 5), self-resolving laryngeal paralysis (n = 1), surgical site infection (n = 1) and septic shock (n = 2). Anastomotic complications occurred in seven patients and consisted of anastomotic dehiscence (n = 1), tracheal stenosis (n = 4) and fatal respiratory failure (n = 2). Revision surgery was performed in two dogs due to anastomotic dehiscence and stenosis, and tracheal stenting was performed in one cat due to stenosis. Sixteen patients survived to hospital discharge and 14 survived to latest follow-up (median: 119 days; range: 14 to 1744). Outcome was scored as excellent in five, good in seven, fair in two and poor in six patients.
Clinical significance: Tracheal resection and anastomosis is the surgical technique of choice to reconstruct tracheal defects. Although more than half of the patients recovered well, high morbidity and mortality rates were documented. This may be due to the severe comorbidities affecting most tracheal resection and anastomosis patients, as well as the client's decision against further treatment when facing serious post-operative complications.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association