Vincent Kyu Lee BS , William T. Reynolds BS , Rebecca R. Hartog MD , Julia Wallace BA , Nancy Beluk RT , Jodie K. Votava-Smith MD , Daryaneh Badaly PhD , Cecilia W. Lo PhD , Rafael Ceschin PhD , Ashok Panigrahy MD
{"title":"Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow Properties and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease","authors":"Vincent Kyu Lee BS , William T. Reynolds BS , Rebecca R. Hartog MD , Julia Wallace BA , Nancy Beluk RT , Jodie K. Votava-Smith MD , Daryaneh Badaly PhD , Cecilia W. Lo PhD , Rafael Ceschin PhD , Ashok Panigrahy MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine whether there are differences in pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow between children and adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) and healthy, age-matched peers, and to determine if abnormal CSF flow is associated with abnormal CSF volumes and whether it predicts executive function outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>CSF flow was measured across the lumen of the aqueduct of Sylvius using cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI at 3.0 T on 60 children and adolescents (CHD = 22, healthy controls = 38). CSF flow modeled as standard pulsatility characteristics (anterograde and retrograde peak velocities, mean velocity, and velocity variance measurements) and dynamic pulsatility characteristics (each participant's CSF flow deviation from study cohort's consensus flow quantified using the root mean squared deviation) were measured. Participants underwent neurocognitive assessments for executive function, focused on inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and working memory domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with controls, the CHD group demonstrated greater dynamic pulsatility over the entire cardiac cycle (higher overall flow root mean squared deviation: <em>P</em> = .0353 for the study cohort fitted; <em>P</em> = .0292 for the control only fitted), but no difference in standard pulsatility measures. However, a lower mean velocity (<em>P</em> = .0323) and lower dynamic CSF flow pulsatility (root mean squared deviation <em>P</em> = .0181 for the study cohort fitted; <em>P</em> = .0149 for the control only fitted) predicted poor inhibitory executive functional outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Although the whole CHD group exhibited higher dynamic CSF flow pulsatility compared with controls, the subset of patients with CHD with relatively reduced static and dynamic CSF flow pulsatility had the worst inhibitory domain executive functioning. These findings suggest that altered CSF flow pulsatility may be related to not only brain compensatory mechanisms, but also to cognitive impairment in CHD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatrics","volume":"280 ","pages":"Article 114494"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022347625000344","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To determine whether there are differences in pulsatile cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow between children and adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) and healthy, age-matched peers, and to determine if abnormal CSF flow is associated with abnormal CSF volumes and whether it predicts executive function outcomes.
Study design
CSF flow was measured across the lumen of the aqueduct of Sylvius using cardiac-gated phase-contrast MRI at 3.0 T on 60 children and adolescents (CHD = 22, healthy controls = 38). CSF flow modeled as standard pulsatility characteristics (anterograde and retrograde peak velocities, mean velocity, and velocity variance measurements) and dynamic pulsatility characteristics (each participant's CSF flow deviation from study cohort's consensus flow quantified using the root mean squared deviation) were measured. Participants underwent neurocognitive assessments for executive function, focused on inhibition, cognitive flexibility, and working memory domains.
Results
Compared with controls, the CHD group demonstrated greater dynamic pulsatility over the entire cardiac cycle (higher overall flow root mean squared deviation: P = .0353 for the study cohort fitted; P = .0292 for the control only fitted), but no difference in standard pulsatility measures. However, a lower mean velocity (P = .0323) and lower dynamic CSF flow pulsatility (root mean squared deviation P = .0181 for the study cohort fitted; P = .0149 for the control only fitted) predicted poor inhibitory executive functional outcomes.
Discussion
Although the whole CHD group exhibited higher dynamic CSF flow pulsatility compared with controls, the subset of patients with CHD with relatively reduced static and dynamic CSF flow pulsatility had the worst inhibitory domain executive functioning. These findings suggest that altered CSF flow pulsatility may be related to not only brain compensatory mechanisms, but also to cognitive impairment in CHD.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatrics is an international peer-reviewed journal that advances pediatric research and serves as a practical guide for pediatricians who manage health and diagnose and treat disorders in infants, children, and adolescents. The Journal publishes original work based on standards of excellence and expert review. The Journal seeks to publish high quality original articles that are immediately applicable to practice (basic science, translational research, evidence-based medicine), brief clinical and laboratory case reports, medical progress, expert commentary, grand rounds, insightful editorials, “classic” physical examinations, and novel insights into clinical and academic pediatric medicine related to every aspect of child health. Published monthly since 1932, The Journal of Pediatrics continues to promote the latest developments in pediatric medicine, child health, policy, and advocacy.
Topics covered in The Journal of Pediatrics include, but are not limited to:
General Pediatrics
Pediatric Subspecialties
Adolescent Medicine
Allergy and Immunology
Cardiology
Critical Care Medicine
Developmental-Behavioral Medicine
Endocrinology
Gastroenterology
Hematology-Oncology
Infectious Diseases
Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
Nephrology
Neurology
Emergency Medicine
Pulmonology
Rheumatology
Genetics
Ethics
Health Service Research
Pediatric Hospitalist Medicine.