Fluorescein Angiography as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Susac Syndrome.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379
Laura Guttieres, Lea Vannelli, Sarah Demortiere, Marine Perriguey, Maya Elziere, Pierre Durozard, Clemence Boutiere, Audrey Rico, Frederic Hilezian, Jan-Patrick Stellmann, Jean Pelletier, Adil Maarouf, Natacha Stolowy, Bertrand Audoin
{"title":"Fluorescein Angiography as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Susac Syndrome.","authors":"Laura Guttieres, Lea Vannelli, Sarah Demortiere, Marine Perriguey, Maya Elziere, Pierre Durozard, Clemence Boutiere, Audrey Rico, Frederic Hilezian, Jan-Patrick Stellmann, Jean Pelletier, Adil Maarouf, Natacha Stolowy, Bertrand Audoin","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting disease activity in Susac syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a blinded analysis of all FA, brain MRI, and audiogram examinations performed throughout the follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 FA examinations, 85 brain MRI scans, and 49 audiograms were analyzed from 9 patients followed for a mean (SD) period of 6 (4) years. Disease activity was detected in 41.5% of FA examinations, 10.5% of MRI scans, and 25% of audiograms (FA vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; FA vs audiogram, <i>p</i> = 0.06; audiogram vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Within 3 months of clinical relapses, activity was observed in 57%, 24%, and 27% of FA, MRI, and audiogram examinations, respectively (FA vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.05; FA vs audiogram, <i>p</i> = 0.09; audiogram vs MRI, <i>p</i> = 1). Quantitative analysis of FA showed a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.5) leakages (both eyes) during relapses compared with 1.2 (1.4) during remission (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>FA, particularly arterial leakage, demonstrated the highest sensitivity in detecting disease activity and may be a valuable tool for treatment management in Susac syndrome. Future studies with larger samples should aim to identify the optimal threshold of FA changes associated with an increased risk of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 2","pages":"e200379"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting disease activity in Susac syndrome.

Methods: We conducted a blinded analysis of all FA, brain MRI, and audiogram examinations performed throughout the follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.

Results: A total of 79 FA examinations, 85 brain MRI scans, and 49 audiograms were analyzed from 9 patients followed for a mean (SD) period of 6 (4) years. Disease activity was detected in 41.5% of FA examinations, 10.5% of MRI scans, and 25% of audiograms (FA vs MRI, p < 0.0001; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.06; audiogram vs MRI, p < 0.05). Within 3 months of clinical relapses, activity was observed in 57%, 24%, and 27% of FA, MRI, and audiogram examinations, respectively (FA vs MRI, p < 0.05; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.09; audiogram vs MRI, p = 1). Quantitative analysis of FA showed a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.5) leakages (both eyes) during relapses compared with 1.2 (1.4) during remission (p < 0.05).

Discussion: FA, particularly arterial leakage, demonstrated the highest sensitivity in detecting disease activity and may be a valuable tool for treatment management in Susac syndrome. Future studies with larger samples should aim to identify the optimal threshold of FA changes associated with an increased risk of relapse.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
219
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.
期刊最新文献
Abatacept Induces Long-Term Reconstitution of the B-Cell Niche in a Patient With CTLA-4 Haploinsufficiency: A Case Report. Clinical and Paraclinical Characterizations, Management, and Prognosis in DPPX Antibody-Associated Encephalitis: A Systematic Review. Clinical Characterization and Prognostic Risk Factors of Susac Syndrome: A Retrospective Multicenter Study. Long-Term Clinical and Biological Prognostic Factors of Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis in Children. Aberrant Complement Activation Is Associated With Structural Brain Damage in Multiple Sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1