Laura Guttieres, Lea Vannelli, Sarah Demortiere, Marine Perriguey, Maya Elziere, Pierre Durozard, Clemence Boutiere, Audrey Rico, Frederic Hilezian, Jan-Patrick Stellmann, Jean Pelletier, Adil Maarouf, Natacha Stolowy, Bertrand Audoin
{"title":"Fluorescein Angiography as a Surrogate Marker of Disease Activity in Susac Syndrome.","authors":"Laura Guttieres, Lea Vannelli, Sarah Demortiere, Marine Perriguey, Maya Elziere, Pierre Durozard, Clemence Boutiere, Audrey Rico, Frederic Hilezian, Jan-Patrick Stellmann, Jean Pelletier, Adil Maarouf, Natacha Stolowy, Bertrand Audoin","doi":"10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting disease activity in Susac syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a blinded analysis of all FA, brain MRI, and audiogram examinations performed throughout the follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 79 FA examinations, 85 brain MRI scans, and 49 audiograms were analyzed from 9 patients followed for a mean (SD) period of 6 (4) years. Disease activity was detected in 41.5% of FA examinations, 10.5% of MRI scans, and 25% of audiograms (FA vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.0001; FA vs audiogram, <i>p</i> = 0.06; audiogram vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Within 3 months of clinical relapses, activity was observed in 57%, 24%, and 27% of FA, MRI, and audiogram examinations, respectively (FA vs MRI, <i>p</i> < 0.05; FA vs audiogram, <i>p</i> = 0.09; audiogram vs MRI, <i>p</i> = 1). Quantitative analysis of FA showed a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.5) leakages (both eyes) during relapses compared with 1.2 (1.4) during remission (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>FA, particularly arterial leakage, demonstrated the highest sensitivity in detecting disease activity and may be a valuable tool for treatment management in Susac syndrome. Future studies with larger samples should aim to identify the optimal threshold of FA changes associated with an increased risk of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":19472,"journal":{"name":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","volume":"12 2","pages":"e200379"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11805606/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology® Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200379","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the sensitivity of fluorescein angiography (FA) in detecting disease activity in Susac syndrome.
Methods: We conducted a blinded analysis of all FA, brain MRI, and audiogram examinations performed throughout the follow-up of patients with Susac syndrome.
Results: A total of 79 FA examinations, 85 brain MRI scans, and 49 audiograms were analyzed from 9 patients followed for a mean (SD) period of 6 (4) years. Disease activity was detected in 41.5% of FA examinations, 10.5% of MRI scans, and 25% of audiograms (FA vs MRI, p < 0.0001; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.06; audiogram vs MRI, p < 0.05). Within 3 months of clinical relapses, activity was observed in 57%, 24%, and 27% of FA, MRI, and audiogram examinations, respectively (FA vs MRI, p < 0.05; FA vs audiogram, p = 0.09; audiogram vs MRI, p = 1). Quantitative analysis of FA showed a mean (SD) of 2.5 (2.5) leakages (both eyes) during relapses compared with 1.2 (1.4) during remission (p < 0.05).
Discussion: FA, particularly arterial leakage, demonstrated the highest sensitivity in detecting disease activity and may be a valuable tool for treatment management in Susac syndrome. Future studies with larger samples should aim to identify the optimal threshold of FA changes associated with an increased risk of relapse.
期刊介绍:
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation is an official journal of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation will be the premier peer-reviewed journal in neuroimmunology and neuroinflammation. This journal publishes rigorously peer-reviewed open-access reports of original research and in-depth reviews of topics in neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, affecting the full range of neurologic diseases including (but not limited to) Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ALS, tauopathy, and stroke; multiple sclerosis and NMO; inflammatory peripheral nerve and muscle disease, Guillain-Barré and myasthenia gravis; nervous system infection; paraneoplastic syndromes, noninfectious encephalitides and other antibody-mediated disorders; and psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders. Clinical trials, instructive case reports, and small case series will also be featured.