Modeling renewable energy market performance under climate policy uncertainty: A novel multivariate quantile causality analysis.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1111/risa.17714
Avik Sinha, Muntasir Murshed, Narasingha Das, Tanaya Saha
{"title":"Modeling renewable energy market performance under climate policy uncertainty: A novel multivariate quantile causality analysis.","authors":"Avik Sinha, Muntasir Murshed, Narasingha Das, Tanaya Saha","doi":"10.1111/risa.17714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The renewable energy market in the United States of America (USA) has experienced several crests and troughs owing to the changes in the climate policies. These changes in the climate policies have impacted the climate risk management scenario in the USA. This impact has changed the behavioral pattern of the renewable energy drivers, and a supply-side analysis of this aspect is largely ignored in the literature. In this pursuit, the present study aims at analyzing the moderating role of climate policy uncertainty in shaping the behavior of renewable energy drivers in the USA. Given the risk analysis perspective, a novel multivariate quantile-on-quantile causality test is introduced in the present study to address five aspects of risk analysis, i.e., tail dependence, co-movement, predictability, multivariate, and asymmetric impact. Moreover, this test also addresses the omitted variable bias and absence of ortho-partiality distribution, which were inherent to Granger causality test. Along with the analysis at the national level, a firm-level analysis is also done by taking the top-5 renewable energy generation firms of the USA. The results show that the climate policy uncertainty has a dampening effect on the renewable energy drivers, and this effect differs at the firm level. These impacts show a significant policy dimension for addressing the climatic risk management concerns in the USA, while achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 objectives.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":"1984-2038"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.17714","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The renewable energy market in the United States of America (USA) has experienced several crests and troughs owing to the changes in the climate policies. These changes in the climate policies have impacted the climate risk management scenario in the USA. This impact has changed the behavioral pattern of the renewable energy drivers, and a supply-side analysis of this aspect is largely ignored in the literature. In this pursuit, the present study aims at analyzing the moderating role of climate policy uncertainty in shaping the behavior of renewable energy drivers in the USA. Given the risk analysis perspective, a novel multivariate quantile-on-quantile causality test is introduced in the present study to address five aspects of risk analysis, i.e., tail dependence, co-movement, predictability, multivariate, and asymmetric impact. Moreover, this test also addresses the omitted variable bias and absence of ortho-partiality distribution, which were inherent to Granger causality test. Along with the analysis at the national level, a firm-level analysis is also done by taking the top-5 renewable energy generation firms of the USA. The results show that the climate policy uncertainty has a dampening effect on the renewable energy drivers, and this effect differs at the firm level. These impacts show a significant policy dimension for addressing the climatic risk management concerns in the USA, while achieving the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 7 objectives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气候政策不确定性下的可再生能源市场表现建模:一种新的多元分位数因果分析。
由于气候政策的变化,美利坚合众国(美国)的可再生能源市场经历了几次高峰和低谷。气候政策的这些变化影响了美国的气候风险管理情景。这种影响改变了可再生能源驱动者的行为模式,而这方面的供给侧分析在文献中很大程度上被忽略了。在这一追求中,本研究旨在分析气候政策不确定性在塑造美国可再生能源驱动者行为方面的调节作用。从风险分析的角度出发,本文引入了一种新的多变量分位数对分位数因果检验,以解决风险分析的五个方面,即尾部依赖性、共同运动、可预测性、多变量和不对称影响。此外,该检验还解决了格兰杰因果检验固有的遗漏变量偏差和不存在正偏性分布的问题。除了国家层面的分析外,还对美国前5大可再生能源发电公司进行了公司层面的分析。结果表明,气候政策的不确定性对可再生能源驱动因素有抑制作用,且这种抑制作用在企业层面上存在差异。这些影响显示了解决美国气候风险管理问题的重要政策维度,同时实现可持续发展目标(SDG) 7的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
期刊最新文献
A Comprehensive Risk Analysis Framework for Medical AI: A Mixed-Methods Approach. AI in Carbon Sink Trading: Using Attack Trees to Assess Low- to Medium-Risk Scenarios. Correction to "Does the exponential Wells-Riley model provide a good fit for human coronavirus and rhinovirus? A comparison of four dose-response models based on human challenge data". Risk-Resilience Feedback to Assure Critical Societal Functions. Corrigendum to "The Lasting Effect of the Romantic View of Nature: How It Influences Perceptions of Risk and the Support of Symbolic Actions Against Climate Change" (Risk Analysis, 2025; 45: 1399-1409).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1