Anterior Shoulder Instability with Epilepsy: Bankart Repair Versus Latarjet Procedure.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.4055/cios24124
Sung Min Rhee, Chang Woo Woo, Cheol Hwan Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Yong Girl Rhee
{"title":"Anterior Shoulder Instability with Epilepsy: Bankart Repair Versus Latarjet Procedure.","authors":"Sung Min Rhee, Chang Woo Woo, Cheol Hwan Kim, Dong Hyun Kim, Yong Girl Rhee","doi":"10.4055/cios24124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgroud: </strong>Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18-50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"157-165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgroud: Anterior dislocation in epilepsy patients is relatively severe, difficult to treat, and prone to recurrence. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of arthroscopic Bankart repair and the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy patients who had anterior shoulder instability and to compare the results of the open Latarjet procedure in epilepsy and non-epileptic groups.

Methods: A total of 57 shoulders (34 dominant) in 55 patients (18-50 years, 45 men and 10 women) with anterior glenohumeral instability were included in the study and the average follow-up was 24 months. Out of 21 epilepsy patients (23 shoulders), 11 were treated with the open Latarjet procedure and 12 with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Additionally, comparisons were made between the 34 non-epileptic patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure and the epilepsy patients who underwent the same procedure.

Results: In the epilepsy group, all 12 patients who underwent Bankart repair had on-track lesions, and all 11 patients who underwent the Latarjet procedure had off-track lesions. In the non-epilepsy group, all cases were off-track lesions. In the epilepsy group, there was no significant difference in the postoperative clinical outcome and recurrence rate between the Bankart repair and Latarjet procedure groups. In the Latarjet group, postoperative re-dislocation rate in the non-epilepsy patients was 14% (5/34 cases), compared to 45% (5/11 cases) in the epilepsy patients, 4 of which 4 occurred during seizures. It was 41% in the Bankart repair group for on-track lesions, which was similar to the recurrence rate after the Latarjet for off-track lesions in the epilepsy group.

Conclusions: After the Latarjet procedure, the functional outcomes in the epilepsy group were similar to those in the non-epilepsy group, except for the higher re-dislocation rate. With either of the surgical procedures, the re-dislocation rate secondary to seizures was very high. Despite the presence of on-track lesions, the Latarjet procedure would be more preferrable for anterior stabilization in epilepsy patients, in view of the high recurrence rate with arthroscopic Bankart repair.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前肩不稳定与癫痫:Bankart修复与Latarjet手术。
背景:癫痫患者前脱位比较严重,治疗困难,易复发。本研究的目的是比较关节镜下Bankart修复和开放Latarjet手术在患有前肩不稳的癫痫患者中的结果,并比较开放Latarjet手术在癫痫组和非癫痫组中的结果。方法:55例(18-50岁,男45例,女10例)肱骨前盂不稳患者共57个肩关节(34个优势),平均随访24个月。在21例癫痫患者(23例肩关节)中,11例采用开放式Latarjet手术,12例采用关节镜下Bankart修复。此外,对34例接受开放Latarjet手术的非癫痫患者与接受相同手术的癫痫患者进行比较。结果:在癫痫组中,所有12例接受Bankart修复的患者都有轨道病变,所有11例接受Latarjet手术的患者都有轨道病变。在非癫痫组中,所有病例均为偏离轨道病变。在癫痫组,Bankart修复组和Latarjet手术组在术后临床结果和复发率方面无显著差异。Latarjet组非癫痫患者术后再脱位率为14%(5/34例),癫痫患者术后再脱位率为45%(5/11例),其中4例发生在癫痫发作期间。Bankart修复组脱轨病变复发率为41%,与癫痫组Latarjet治疗脱轨病变后的复发率相似。结论:癫痫组经Latarjet手术后,除再脱位率较高外,功能结局与非癫痫组相似。无论采用哪种手术方式,继发于癫痫发作的再脱位率都非常高。考虑到关节镜下Bankart修复的高复发率,尽管存在轨道病变,Latarjet手术对于癫痫患者的前路稳定更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Reduction and Fixation of Coronoid Fracture with Screws and Modified Pull Out Configuration. An Anatomical Study to Ensure Precise Percutaneous Release of the Annular Pulley in the Trigger Finger. A Smaller Posterior Tibial Slope May Be Associated with an Increased Risk of Tears in the Anterior Horn of the Lateral Meniscus. Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Reverse Sural Flap of Lower Extremity Defects: A Comparative Retrospective Study. Delta Neutrophil Index as an Early Screening and Prognostic Marker for Revision after Non-traumatic Below-Knee Amputation: A Hospital-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1