Priming using human and chimpanzee expressions of emotion biases attention toward positive emotions.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Cognition & Emotion Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1080/02699931.2025.2455600
Anna Matsulevits, Mariska E Kret
{"title":"Priming using human and chimpanzee expressions of emotion biases attention toward positive emotions.","authors":"Anna Matsulevits, Mariska E Kret","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2455600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perceiving and correctly interpreting emotional expressions is one of the most important abilities for social animals' communication. It determines the majority of social interactions, group dynamics, and cooperation - being highly relevant for an individual's survival. Core mechanisms of this ability have been hypothesised to be shared across closely related species with phylogenetic similarities. This study explored homologies in human processing of species-specific facial expressions using eye-tracking. Introducing a prime-target paradigm, we tested the influences on human attention elicited by priming with differently valenced emotional stimuli depicting human and chimpanzee faces. We demonstrated an attention shift towards the conspecific (human) target picture that was congruent with the valence depicted in the primer picture. We did not find this effect with heterospecific (chimpanzee) primers and ruled out that this was due to participants interpreting them incorrectly. Implications about the involvement of related emotion-processing mechanisms for human and chimpanzee facial expressions are discussed. Systematic cross-species-investigations of emotional expressions are needed to unravel how emotion representation mechanisms can extend to process other species' faces. Through such studies, we can better understand the implications of humans' and apes' shared evolutionary ancestry and better understand \"<i>Where our emotions come from\"</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1374-1383"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2455600","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceiving and correctly interpreting emotional expressions is one of the most important abilities for social animals' communication. It determines the majority of social interactions, group dynamics, and cooperation - being highly relevant for an individual's survival. Core mechanisms of this ability have been hypothesised to be shared across closely related species with phylogenetic similarities. This study explored homologies in human processing of species-specific facial expressions using eye-tracking. Introducing a prime-target paradigm, we tested the influences on human attention elicited by priming with differently valenced emotional stimuli depicting human and chimpanzee faces. We demonstrated an attention shift towards the conspecific (human) target picture that was congruent with the valence depicted in the primer picture. We did not find this effect with heterospecific (chimpanzee) primers and ruled out that this was due to participants interpreting them incorrectly. Implications about the involvement of related emotion-processing mechanisms for human and chimpanzee facial expressions are discussed. Systematic cross-species-investigations of emotional expressions are needed to unravel how emotion representation mechanisms can extend to process other species' faces. Through such studies, we can better understand the implications of humans' and apes' shared evolutionary ancestry and better understand "Where our emotions come from".

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人类和黑猩猩情绪表达的启动效应将注意力偏向积极情绪。
感知和正确解释情绪表达是社会性动物最重要的交际能力之一。它决定了大多数的社会互动、群体动力和合作——与个人的生存高度相关。这种能力的核心机制被假设为在系统发育相似的密切相关物种之间共享。本研究利用眼动追踪技术探讨了人类处理特定物种面部表情的同源性。引入启动-目标范式,我们测试了不同价值的人类和黑猩猩面孔情绪刺激启动对人类注意力的影响。我们证明了注意力向与引物图中描述的价相一致的同种(人类)目标图的转移。我们没有在异种(黑猩猩)引物中发现这种效应,并排除了这是由于参与者错误地解释它们造成的。讨论了人类和黑猩猩面部表情相关情绪加工机制的影响。需要对情绪表达进行系统的跨物种研究,以揭示情绪表征机制如何扩展到处理其他物种的面部。通过这样的研究,我们可以更好地理解人类和猿类共同进化祖先的含义,更好地理解“我们的情感从何而来”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
期刊最新文献
A new look at Good Samaritans: task relevance of emotion impacts attention allocation to other people in need of help. Evaluative conditioning using virtual reality events. Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative. The role of state anxiety in salience-driven distractor processing: evidence from singleton detection and feature search. Tracking anger at self and others and non-suicidal self-injury cognitions and behavior: an ecological momentary assessment study in emerging adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1