Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1089/lap.2024.0305
Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman
{"title":"Adoption of Single-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy Increases Utilization of the Retroperitoneal Approach: A Report from the Single-Port Advanced Research Consortium.","authors":"Michael Raver, Mutahar Ahmed, Kennedy E Okhawere, Indu Saini, Ruchir Chaturvedi, Milan Patel, Ruben Sauer Calvo, Nicolas A Soputro, Roxana Ramos, Mubashir Billah, Simone Crivellaro, Ahmed M Mansour, Jihad Kaouk, Nirmish Singla, James Porter, Ronney Abaza, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K Hemal, Phillip M Pierorazio, Benjamin I Chung, Craig G Rogers, Reza Mehrazin, Ketan Badani, Michael Stifelman","doi":"10.1089/lap.2024.0305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"131-137"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0305","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Retroperitoneal approach for robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) has been shown to offer shorter operative times and hospital stays without differences in complication rates compared with the transperitoneal approach. The single-port (SP) system may be better suited than multiport (MP) for challenges with the retroperitoneal approach such as narrow access geometry. We evaluated if the adoption of SP PN increased the utilization of retroperitoneal approach. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed an IRB-approved multi-institutional database of all PN from 2013 to 2023. The date of the first SP PN split the cohorts before and after SP adoption. The percentage of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approach cases overall and for SP and MP was determined before and after adoption. Joinpoint analysis assessed changes in rates of the retroperitoneal approach. Logistic regression compared patient and tumor characteristics with retroperitoneal approach PN before and after adoption of SP. Results: Overall 1959 patients were evaluated, of which 654 were performed prior versus 1305 after SP adoption. There was an increased percentage of retroperitoneal approach after adoption, with 7.3% (48/654) before compared with 24.8% (324/1305) after adoption. The percentage of the retroperitoneal approach for SP PN was 52.8% (134/254), increasing over time with 75% (24/32) of SP in 2023 performed with a retroperitoneal approach. Conclusion: The retroperitoneal approach was used more frequently than the transperitoneal approach in the SP cohort. The adoption of SP increased the incidence of the retroperitoneal approach.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用单孔机器人部分肾切除术增加了腹膜后入路的利用率:一份来自单孔高级研究联盟的报告。
介绍:与经腹膜入路相比,经腹膜后入路进行机器人部分肾切除术(PN)的手术时间和住院时间更短,并发症发生率无差异。单口(SP)系统可能比多口(MP)更适合腹膜后入路的挑战,如狭窄的通道几何形状。我们评估SP - PN的采用是否增加了腹膜后入路的使用。方法:我们回顾性地回顾了irb批准的2013年至2023年所有PN的多机构数据库。第一个SP PN的日期将SP采用前后的队列分开。测定手术前后经腹膜后入路和经腹膜后入路病例的总体百分比以及SP和MP的百分比。关节点分析评估了腹膜后入路发生率的变化。Logistic回归比较了采用SP前后腹膜后入路PN患者和肿瘤特征。结果:共评估了1959例患者,其中654例采用SP前,1305例采用SP后。收养后采用腹膜后入路的比例有所增加,收养前为7.3%(48/654),收养后为24.8%(324/1305)。经腹膜后入路治疗SP PN的比例为52.8%(134/254),随着时间的推移而增加,2023年75%(24/32)的SP采用腹膜后入路。结论:在SP队列中,腹膜后入路比经腹膜入路使用频率更高。SP的采用增加了腹膜后入路的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques (JLAST) is the leading international peer-reviewed journal for practicing surgeons who want to keep up with the latest thinking and advanced surgical technologies in laparoscopy, endoscopy, NOTES, and robotics. The Journal is ideally suited to surgeons who are early adopters of new technology and techniques. Recognizing that many new technologies and techniques have significant overlap with several surgical specialties, JLAST is the first journal to focus on these topics both in general and pediatric surgery, and includes other surgical subspecialties such as: urology, gynecologic surgery, thoracic surgery, and more.
期刊最新文献
Changes in the Surgical Management of Pheochromocytoma. Utility of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Minimally Invasive Low Anterior Resections for Rectal Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Experience from a Single Center in the Middle East. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Crohn's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis. Surgical Efficacy of Robotic Adrenalectomy: Korean Nationwide Comparative Data Analysis Focusing on Robotic Modality, Surgical Approach, and Tumor Characteristics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1