Clinical outcomes following elective lumbar spine surgery in patients living with dementia

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine Journal Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.040
Patawut Bovonratwet MD , Kaitlyn E. Holly BS , Lingwei Xiang MPH , Rachel R Adler ScD, RD , Clancy J. Clark MD , Karen Sepucha PhD , Samir K. Shah MD , Dae Hyun Kim MD, ScD , John Hsu MD , Joel S. Weissman PhD , Andrew J. Schoenfeld MD, MSc
{"title":"Clinical outcomes following elective lumbar spine surgery in patients living with dementia","authors":"Patawut Bovonratwet MD ,&nbsp;Kaitlyn E. Holly BS ,&nbsp;Lingwei Xiang MPH ,&nbsp;Rachel R Adler ScD, RD ,&nbsp;Clancy J. Clark MD ,&nbsp;Karen Sepucha PhD ,&nbsp;Samir K. Shah MD ,&nbsp;Dae Hyun Kim MD, ScD ,&nbsp;John Hsu MD ,&nbsp;Joel S. Weissman PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Schoenfeld MD, MSc","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3><div>As the population ages and surgical techniques improve, more elderly patients with dementia are being considered for treatment of spinal disorders. However, the combined impact of procedural intensity and anesthesia exposure can exacerbate surgical risks, leading to more complex recoveries and postoperative morbidity.</div></div><div><h3>PURPOSE</h3><div>To compare postsurgical outcomes of patients living with dementia who received elective lumbar spine surgery with a comparable group of patients without dementia.</div></div><div><h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3><div>Retrospective analysis using national Medicare claims.</div></div><div><h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3><div>We identified Medicare beneficiaries living with dementia who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between 2017 and 2018. This cohort was compared to Medicare beneficiaries who received comparable surgeries but without a diagnosis of dementia.</div></div><div><h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3><div>The primary outcome was any adverse event (AAE) within 180 days of surgery, with postoperative intensive interventions considered in parallel with other clinical outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><div>We employed inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding. We compared outcomes between cohorts using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) from Cox-proportional hazard models and Fine-and-gray models considering death as a competing risk.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>We included 101,313 patients. Within 180 days of surgery, patients with dementia had an increased hazard of AAE than those without dementia (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.21,1.40). Patients with dementia also demonstrated a greater hazard of mortality (aHR 1.75, 95%CI 1.33, 2.29) and postoperative intensive interventions (aHR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08, 2.49) over the same time frame.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3><div>We found a significantly increased risk of adverse events among patients living with dementia undergoing lumbar spine surgery. We believe these risks were previously underappreciated because of the focus on urgent procedures (eg, hip and odontoid fractures) in prior research evaluating postoperative outcomes for patients with dementia. Our results suggest the need for greater caution when recommending elective, high-intensity, surgical interventions for patients living with dementia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"Pages 18-28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1529943025000816","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As the population ages and surgical techniques improve, more elderly patients with dementia are being considered for treatment of spinal disorders. However, the combined impact of procedural intensity and anesthesia exposure can exacerbate surgical risks, leading to more complex recoveries and postoperative morbidity.

PURPOSE

To compare postsurgical outcomes of patients living with dementia who received elective lumbar spine surgery with a comparable group of patients without dementia.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective analysis using national Medicare claims.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We identified Medicare beneficiaries living with dementia who underwent elective lumbar spine surgery between 2017 and 2018. This cohort was compared to Medicare beneficiaries who received comparable surgeries but without a diagnosis of dementia.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was any adverse event (AAE) within 180 days of surgery, with postoperative intensive interventions considered in parallel with other clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We employed inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding. We compared outcomes between cohorts using adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) from Cox-proportional hazard models and Fine-and-gray models considering death as a competing risk.

RESULTS

We included 101,313 patients. Within 180 days of surgery, patients with dementia had an increased hazard of AAE than those without dementia (aHR 1.30; 95% CI 1.21,1.40). Patients with dementia also demonstrated a greater hazard of mortality (aHR 1.75, 95%CI 1.33, 2.29) and postoperative intensive interventions (aHR 1.64, 95% CI 1.08, 2.49) over the same time frame.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significantly increased risk of adverse events among patients living with dementia undergoing lumbar spine surgery. We believe these risks were previously underappreciated because of the focus on urgent procedures (eg, hip and odontoid fractures) in prior research evaluating postoperative outcomes for patients with dementia. Our results suggest the need for greater caution when recommending elective, high-intensity, surgical interventions for patients living with dementia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆患者择期腰椎手术后的临床结果
背景背景:随着人口老龄化和手术技术的提高,越来越多的老年痴呆患者正在考虑接受脊柱疾病的治疗。然而,手术强度和麻醉暴露的综合影响会加剧手术风险,导致更复杂的恢复和术后发病率。目的:比较接受择期腰椎手术的痴呆患者与对照组无痴呆患者的术后预后。研究设计/设置:使用国家医疗保险索赔进行回顾性分析。患者样本:我们确定了2017-2018年间接受择期腰椎手术的老年痴呆症医疗保险受益人。该队列与接受类似手术但未被诊断为痴呆症的医疗保险受益人进行比较。结果指标:主要结果是手术180天内的任何不良事件(AAE),术后强化干预与其他临床结果并行考虑。方法:采用处理权的逆概率法对混杂因素进行校正。我们使用cox比例风险模型的调整风险比(aHR)和考虑死亡为竞争风险的Fine-and-Gray模型来比较队列之间的结果。结果:纳入101313例患者。手术后180天内,痴呆患者发生AAE的风险高于无痴呆患者(aHR 1.30;95% ci 1.21,1.40)。在同一时间段内,痴呆患者的死亡率(aHR 1.75, 95%CI 1.33, 2.29)和术后强化干预(aHR 1.64, 95%CI 1.08, 2.49)的风险也更高。结论:我们发现痴呆患者接受腰椎手术的不良事件风险显著增加。我们认为这些风险以前被低估了,因为在先前评估痴呆症患者术后结果的研究中,重点是紧急手术(例如髋关节和齿状突骨折)。我们的研究结果表明,在为痴呆症患者推荐选择性的、高强度的手术干预时,需要更加谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Real-World Implementation Strategies and Preparation for Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM): Academic, Community Hospital-Employed, and Private Practice Perspectives." Association Between Antidepressant Use and Pseudarthrosis Following Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Optimization of Frailty Indices in Predicting the Risk of Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery Under Non-General Anesthesia. Complications of Spinal Fusion: Comparing Medicare Transforming Episode Accountability (TEAM) Hospitals to Control Hospitals. Evaluating the Utility of Melatonin in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1