Community prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.5664/jcsm.11584
Brett L Duce, Antti E Kulkas, Timo T Leppänen, Arie Oksenberg, Juha Töyräs, Craig A Hukins
{"title":"Community prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea.","authors":"Brett L Duce, Antti E Kulkas, Timo T Leppänen, Arie Oksenberg, Juha Töyräs, Craig A Hukins","doi":"10.5664/jcsm.11584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study objectives: </strong>The prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in community populations warrants further investigation. Further, more research is needed into the clinical characteristics of its subtypes such as supine predominant OSA (spOSA) and supine isolated OSA (siOSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 1870 Sleep Heart Health Study participants. OSA was defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of five events or more per hour of sleep. Participants with OSA were classified as POSA if the supine AHI was ≥2 times the non-supine AHI. Participants with OSA who did not meet this threshold were classified as non-positional OSA participants (non-POSA). Demographics, polysomnographic data, comorbidities, and medications were all considered. The POSA subtypes spOSA and siOSA were also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POSA participants were slightly older, less obese, and had higher systolic blood pressure than non-POSA subjects, in addition to being more prevalent (62% and 38%, respectively). POSA exhibited higher supine and total AHI. The prevalence of comorbidities or prescription drugs did not differ. In the POSA cohort, spOSA was more prevalent than siOSA (56% vs. 44%). When compared to siOSA, spOSA was associated with more fragmented sleep and higher AHI. Furthermore, when compared to the siOSA group, the spOSA group had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, as well as more frequently prescribed medications for these comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the SHHS population the prevalence of POSA is greater than non-POSA. The spOSA subtype is more prevalent and appears to have worse health consequences than siOSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":50233,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objectives: The prevalence of positional obstructive sleep apnea (POSA) in community populations warrants further investigation. Further, more research is needed into the clinical characteristics of its subtypes such as supine predominant OSA (spOSA) and supine isolated OSA (siOSA).

Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on 1870 Sleep Heart Health Study participants. OSA was defined by an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of five events or more per hour of sleep. Participants with OSA were classified as POSA if the supine AHI was ≥2 times the non-supine AHI. Participants with OSA who did not meet this threshold were classified as non-positional OSA participants (non-POSA). Demographics, polysomnographic data, comorbidities, and medications were all considered. The POSA subtypes spOSA and siOSA were also investigated.

Results: POSA participants were slightly older, less obese, and had higher systolic blood pressure than non-POSA subjects, in addition to being more prevalent (62% and 38%, respectively). POSA exhibited higher supine and total AHI. The prevalence of comorbidities or prescription drugs did not differ. In the POSA cohort, spOSA was more prevalent than siOSA (56% vs. 44%). When compared to siOSA, spOSA was associated with more fragmented sleep and higher AHI. Furthermore, when compared to the siOSA group, the spOSA group had a higher prevalence of hypertension and diabetes, as well as more frequently prescribed medications for these comorbidities.

Conclusions: In the SHHS population the prevalence of POSA is greater than non-POSA. The spOSA subtype is more prevalent and appears to have worse health consequences than siOSA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
7.00%
发文量
321
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine focuses on clinical sleep medicine. Its emphasis is publication of papers with direct applicability and/or relevance to the clinical practice of sleep medicine. This includes clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical commentary and debate, medical economic/practice perspectives, case series and novel/interesting case reports. In addition, the journal will publish proceedings from conferences, workshops and symposia sponsored by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine or other organizations related to improving the practice of sleep medicine.
期刊最新文献
Confirmatory evidence for circadian rhythm sleep-wake disorder by positive airway pressure therapy adherence data. Diagnosis and management of Cheyne-Stokes respiration as a complication of dilated cardiomyopathy in a 10-year-old child. Letter to the editor concerning "Effects of aerobic exercise and resistance training on obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Lin et al. Mean disease alleviation as a comprehensive metric for evaluating continuous positive airway pressure therapy in obstructive sleep apnea: establishing reference values and clinical significance. The accuracy of WatchPAT in obese adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1