Real-world smartphone-based point-of-care diagnostics in primary health care to monitor HbA1c levels in people with diabetes.

IF 5.4 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Communications medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1038/s43856-025-00743-8
Sabrina Rhode, Lisa Rogge, Marthoenis Marthoenis, Till Seuring, Hendra Zufry, Till Bärnighausen, Hizir Sofyan, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Sebastian Vollmer
{"title":"Real-world smartphone-based point-of-care diagnostics in primary health care to monitor HbA1c levels in people with diabetes.","authors":"Sabrina Rhode, Lisa Rogge, Marthoenis Marthoenis, Till Seuring, Hendra Zufry, Till Bärnighausen, Hizir Sofyan, Jennifer Manne-Goehler, Sebastian Vollmer","doi":"10.1038/s43856-025-00743-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of accurate and affordable monitoring of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a common issue among patients with diabetes in low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to test a tablet- and smartphone-based point-of-care (TSB POC) device against a local laboratory-based measure of HbA1c for monitoring diabetes under real-world conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this cross-sectional clinical method applicability study, capillary and venous blood was collected in duplicate and analyzed at local primary health care centers. For a heterogeneity test, the tests were performed by an expert, and by a team of local nurses. The study was conducted in a multicenter design in rural and urban Aceh, Indonesia in 2019, and included a total of 533 adults. We mainly used Bland-Altman plots to assess the number of readings within the 95%-limits of agreement (LoA) and Deming regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show a mean difference between capillary HbA1c on the test device and the reference method of -0.54 [CI<sub>0.95</sub> = -1.6933; 0.6048] with 5.21% of measurements outside the LoA and a Pearson's r = 0.91 in the Deming Regression. There is no significant difference in test concordance between local nurses and the expert (4.23% versus 5.13% results outside the LoA [CI<sub>0.95</sub> = -0.0331; 0.0511]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TSB POC for analysis of HbA1c is an acceptable alternative for accessible monitoring of diabetes patients under these conditions. This method could provide access to high-quality diagnostic decisions through regular and cost-effective HbA1c monitoring directly in healthcare facilities, thus providing better access to essential health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":72646,"journal":{"name":"Communications medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11799141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00743-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of accurate and affordable monitoring of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a common issue among patients with diabetes in low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to test a tablet- and smartphone-based point-of-care (TSB POC) device against a local laboratory-based measure of HbA1c for monitoring diabetes under real-world conditions.

Methods: For this cross-sectional clinical method applicability study, capillary and venous blood was collected in duplicate and analyzed at local primary health care centers. For a heterogeneity test, the tests were performed by an expert, and by a team of local nurses. The study was conducted in a multicenter design in rural and urban Aceh, Indonesia in 2019, and included a total of 533 adults. We mainly used Bland-Altman plots to assess the number of readings within the 95%-limits of agreement (LoA) and Deming regressions.

Results: The results show a mean difference between capillary HbA1c on the test device and the reference method of -0.54 [CI0.95 = -1.6933; 0.6048] with 5.21% of measurements outside the LoA and a Pearson's r = 0.91 in the Deming Regression. There is no significant difference in test concordance between local nurses and the expert (4.23% versus 5.13% results outside the LoA [CI0.95 = -0.0331; 0.0511]).

Conclusions: TSB POC for analysis of HbA1c is an acceptable alternative for accessible monitoring of diabetes patients under these conditions. This method could provide access to high-quality diagnostic decisions through regular and cost-effective HbA1c monitoring directly in healthcare facilities, thus providing better access to essential health services.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在初级卫生保健中基于智能手机的实时诊断以监测糖尿病患者的HbA1c水平。
背景:缺乏准确和负担得起的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)监测是低收入和中等收入国家糖尿病患者的共同问题。我们的目标是测试一种基于平板电脑和智能手机的即时护理(TSB POC)设备,与当地实验室的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量相比较,以监测现实世界条件下的糖尿病。方法:采用横断面临床方法的适用性研究,在当地的初级卫生保健中心采集两份的毛细血管和静脉血进行分析。对于异质性测试,测试由一名专家和一组当地护士进行。该研究于2019年在印度尼西亚亚齐农村和城市采用多中心设计进行,共包括533名成年人。我们主要使用Bland-Altman图来评估95%的一致性(LoA)和Deming回归范围内的读数数量。结果:试验装置上毛细管糖化血红蛋白与参考方法的平均差值为-0.54 [CI0.95 = -1.6933;0.6048], 5.21%的测量值在LoA之外,在Deming回归中Pearson的r = 0.91。本地护士与专家的测试一致性无显著差异(4.23% vs . 5.13%) [CI0.95 = -0.0331;0.0511])。结论:TSB POC分析HbA1c是可接受的替代监测糖尿病患者在这些条件下。这种方法可以直接在医疗机构通过定期和具有成本效益的HbA1c监测提供高质量的诊断决策,从而提供更好的基本卫生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Harnessing health economic evaluation for policy and practice. Interpretable predictions from whole-body FDG-PET/CT using parameters associated with clinical outcome. Stratification of Alzheimer's disease patients using knowledge-guided unsupervised latent factor clustering with electronic health record data. Prenatal and postnatal droughts interact in shaping cognitive development. Interactive multimodal disease risk evaluation using a self-service non-invasive device.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1