The value of ultrasound (US)-based radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 stage breast invasive ductal carcinoma with negative axillary US results.

Hai-Fei Lan, Yi-Dong Gu, Xiu-Feng Song, Yong-Jie Wang
{"title":"The value of ultrasound (US)-based radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with T1 stage breast invasive ductal carcinoma with negative axillary US results.","authors":"Hai-Fei Lan, Yi-Dong Gu, Xiu-Feng Song, Yong-Jie Wang","doi":"10.3233/CH-242413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the potential application value of qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer, with special emphasis on area ratio.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>146 patients with 146 T1 stage breast cancers were subjected to conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS before surgeries. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the associated risk factors and a prediction model was created to predict T1 stage breast IDCs with positive of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM). The diagnostic performance of the prediction model was assessed by the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The value of area ratio, a quantitative CEUS feature, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression analysis indicated that taller than wide shape on conventional US, coarse or twist penetrating vessels, and area ratio > 1.93 on CEUS were independent risk factors for IDCs with ALNM-positive (all P < 0.05). Among all risk factors, the area ratio > 1.93 showed the highest AUC (i.e. 0.818). The prediction equation was established as follows: P = 1/1 + Exp∑ [-2.665 + 1.750×(if taller than wide shape) + 1.791×(if coarse or twist penetrating vessels) + 4.372×(if area ratio > 1.93)]. In comparison with US BI-RADS alone, the AUCs of the prediction model for both readers increased significantly (AUC: 0. 919 vs. 0.677 in reader 1, 0.919 vs. 0.707 in reader 2, both P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Conventional US and CEUS features, especially the area ratio > 1.93 on CEUS, may be useful in the noninvasive prediction of ALNM-positive in breast IDCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93943,"journal":{"name":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","volume":"89 1","pages":"137-148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/CH-242413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the potential application value of qualitative and quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features for predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in early-stage breast cancer, with special emphasis on area ratio.

Methods: 146 patients with 146 T1 stage breast cancers were subjected to conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS before surgeries. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the associated risk factors and a prediction model was created to predict T1 stage breast IDCs with positive of axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM). The diagnostic performance of the prediction model was assessed by the analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. The value of area ratio, a quantitative CEUS feature, was evaluated.

Results: Logistic regression analysis indicated that taller than wide shape on conventional US, coarse or twist penetrating vessels, and area ratio > 1.93 on CEUS were independent risk factors for IDCs with ALNM-positive (all P < 0.05). Among all risk factors, the area ratio > 1.93 showed the highest AUC (i.e. 0.818). The prediction equation was established as follows: P = 1/1 + Exp∑ [-2.665 + 1.750×(if taller than wide shape) + 1.791×(if coarse or twist penetrating vessels) + 4.372×(if area ratio > 1.93)]. In comparison with US BI-RADS alone, the AUCs of the prediction model for both readers increased significantly (AUC: 0. 919 vs. 0.677 in reader 1, 0.919 vs. 0.707 in reader 2, both P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Conventional US and CEUS features, especially the area ratio > 1.93 on CEUS, may be useful in the noninvasive prediction of ALNM-positive in breast IDCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于超声(US)的放射组学对T1期乳腺浸润性导管癌腋窝淋巴结转移的预测价值
目的:探讨定性和定量超声造影(CEUS)特征在早期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移预测中的潜在应用价值,重点探讨面积比。方法:对146例T1期乳腺癌患者术前行常规超声及超声造影检查。采用Logistic回归分析确定相关危险因素,建立T1期乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移(ALNM)阳性的预测模型。通过分析受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)、敏感性、特异性和准确性来评估预测模型的诊断性能。对定量超声造影特征面积比的价值进行了评价。结果:Logistic回归分析显示,常规超声显示比宽形高、粗或扭转穿入血管、超声显示面积比bbb1.93是alnm阳性IDCs的独立危险因素(P均为1.93,AUC最高,为0.818)。建立预测方程:P = 1/1 + Exp∑[-2.665 + 1.750×(高于宽形)+ 1.791×(粗或扭穿血管)+ 4.372×(面积比> 1.93)]。与单独使用美国BI-RADS相比,该预测模型对两种读者的AUC均显著增加(AUC: 0。结论:常规US和CEUS的特征,尤其是CEUS的面积比> 1.93,可能有助于对乳腺IDCs中alnm阳性的无创预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Retraction notice. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion quantification of solid liver lesions: First intraoperative characterization of tumor microvascularization. Storage temperature and anticoagulant choice determine the short-term stability of blood rheological parameters. Ultrasound derived fat fraction indicates reduction of liver fat content after lifestyle modification in obese patients. Preoperative prediction of Glypican-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma by two-dimensional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microflow imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1